spamming the same graphs over and over is annoying and does not prove your pointGreta just says give them the facts, but yes, the future for kids is a bit more serious.
I know you'd prefer to just lie to them.
How would you sugar coat this?
Only Three Months Left For Planet Earth( and other false doomsday predictions)
- Thread starter canada-man
- Start date
You're the one spamming old, irrelevant articles here, cm.
I'm posting these charts until you explain why you think that these changes are happening and how the aren't climate change.
But since you can't, you just ignore them.
So expect them to continue until you answer to them.
They come from a letter signed by 11,000 scientists.
pot meets kettle i post different articles in each post not my problem if you refuse to look at them but hypocritically want others to look at yours
i need the names of those 11,000 scientists and their qualifications
Sure, its right here.
Oh, and they did catch a few fakers who tried to sign on, including some mickey mouse guy.
https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/advance-article/doi/10.1093/biosci/biz088/5610806
https://oup.silverchair-cdn.com/oup...EEp3MzrwHQ__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA
Now, are you going to try to attack all 11,000 messengers or try to explain why you think those charts are wrong?
Or are you going to admit that you are wrong?
most of them are not climatologists nor experts in climate science and FYI science is not a democracy quit using the appeal to numbers logical fallacy
1) I fully expect you to never post anything that is not by a climatologist ever again after this post, since you think its not relevant.
2) 11,000 trained scientists are taking this letter's message and those charts seriously. But all you can do is 'appeal to numbers' attacks, you are totally unable to address the issues.
So the chart keeps getting posted until you answer to the numbers shown here.
I didn't think you'd ever be able to honestly reply to facts and real numbers.
You have to really know you've lost a debate to have to run to the mods rather than actually answer.
What's there to debate when it is proven you are scientific illiterate and know nothing about basic high school science in previous global.warming threads. You don't know the science behind lands heating up faster than bodies of water close to them. Spamming is against the forum rules
On the ctv news website there is proposal for people to carry carbon cards climate cultists are moving closer to control what people can or cannot buy.
This carbon rationing was proposed by anti capitalist george monbiot in 2006. He wants every body to have a personal carbon ration system. This is out of Glenn Beck's novel Agenda 21. Will post more info when I get home later tonight.
Hilarious, CM.
You totally have no clue at all about the science and post bullshit from lunarplanner.com and claim I don't know what I'm talking about?
And you discount the entire work of the IPCC and can quote zero scientists who have an actual theory to explain what is going on?
Call the mods, dude, you're hopeless.
dude you know nothing about science this is proven in previous global warming threads. You also know nothing about the difference in heating differences between land and bodies of water. You also know nothing about basic economics. Also you cannot debate all you is post propaganda outlets link to terrorists, holocaust deniers and funded by Ron unz an anti-semitic alt rightist and refuse to look at opposing sources. Most of my graphs are from official government sources that have historic temp and climate data
climate cultists calling for everybody to carry a carbon card or carbon rationing card
TORONTO -- Imagine if, tucked between your debit and credit cards, your wallet had a another piece of plastic: a points card designed to save the planet as you use it.
Loaded with a year’s worth of points, your carbon card would need to be presented to buy a pound of steak from the butcher, a flight to Mexico, a tank of gas – anything that adds emissions to the atmosphere and contributes to climate change.
Your annual points limit would be determined through a variety of factors, such as access to public transit or geography. A lobster fisherman in Nova Scotia who needs gas to power his boat would have more points than, say, a barista in downtown Toronto with access to public transit.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/shoul...oaded-with-a-year-s-worth-of-points-1.4733293
anticapitalist monbiot first propose a carbon ration system
https://www.monbiot.com/2006/10/31/heres-the-plan/
2. Use that target to set an annual carbon cap, which falls on the ski jump trajectory. Then use the cap to set a personal carbon ration. Every citizen is given a free annual quota of carbon dioxide. He spends it by buying gas and electricity, petrol and train and plane tickets. If he runs out, he must buy the rest from someone has has used less than his quota(2). This accounts for about 40% of the carbon dioxide we produce. The rest is auctioned off to companies. It’s a simpler and fairer approach than either green taxation or the Emissions Trading Scheme, and it also provides people with a powerful incentive to demand low-carbon technologies. Timescale: a full scheme in place by January 2009.
TORONTO -- Imagine if, tucked between your debit and credit cards, your wallet had a another piece of plastic: a points card designed to save the planet as you use it.
Loaded with a year’s worth of points, your carbon card would need to be presented to buy a pound of steak from the butcher, a flight to Mexico, a tank of gas – anything that adds emissions to the atmosphere and contributes to climate change.
Your annual points limit would be determined through a variety of factors, such as access to public transit or geography. A lobster fisherman in Nova Scotia who needs gas to power his boat would have more points than, say, a barista in downtown Toronto with access to public transit.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/shoul...oaded-with-a-year-s-worth-of-points-1.4733293
anticapitalist monbiot first propose a carbon ration system
https://www.monbiot.com/2006/10/31/heres-the-plan/
2. Use that target to set an annual carbon cap, which falls on the ski jump trajectory. Then use the cap to set a personal carbon ration. Every citizen is given a free annual quota of carbon dioxide. He spends it by buying gas and electricity, petrol and train and plane tickets. If he runs out, he must buy the rest from someone has has used less than his quota(2). This accounts for about 40% of the carbon dioxide we produce. The rest is auctioned off to companies. It’s a simpler and fairer approach than either green taxation or the Emissions Trading Scheme, and it also provides people with a powerful incentive to demand low-carbon technologies. Timescale: a full scheme in place by January 2009.
You posted a chart from fucking lunarplanner.com
And then you tell me I don't know science?
Get real
We need to wean ourselves off of fossil fuels through higher carbon taxes funding green alternatives, cutting oil subsidies would be a good start.
You need to understand the science.
High carbon taxes will make stuff more expensive . How do you think goods are transported to stores and supermarkets?
These idiots cant even get the weather right.
We were supposed to have some flurries this morning and then it would stop for a few hours.
As of right now downtown Toronto its more than just flurries, its snowing quite a bit
We were supposed to have some flurries this morning and then it would stop for a few hours.
As of right now downtown Toronto its more than just flurries, its snowing quite a bit
You're starting to get it.
High carbon tax will make things more expensive, things that use fossil fuels.
That's the point.
That only took 11 pages.
So how many more before you understand the basics of the science?
