'Mini Ice Age' Looms As NASA Scientist Warns Lack Of Sunspots Could Bring Record Cold

[basketcase]

Also of interest is the chart at the bottom of that page that shows that those who do the more work people in the field do, the more likely they are to conclude human CO2 is a big part of the problem.

If you have any background in stats then page 9 is also very enlightening.

 

[PornAddict]

Did you read those results?

17.1% think CO2 is responsible more than 100%
32.2% think it's 76-100%
16.6% between 51 and 75%
=======

Add the above total gives you only=65.9% that climate scientists that believe in > 50% confidence level in the main role co2 play in AGW.

*********************

5.2% say 26-50%
6.5% say 0-25%
========

Add this two above give you only 11.7% that believe that there are < 50% confidence that cO2 is responsible

==========


***********************
9.9% say unknown
8.8% don't know.
==========

Add this two up give you =17.7% show you that the role that none of co2 are not in play

The rest of those confident in their answer are only arguing how much of a role it plays.

I fixed the quote for you so you can understand it better.

Bullshit .. Look at the figure it clearly point out only 66% of climate scientists support hypothesis. Which also moviefan pointed out to you on his previous post way back. Therefore there were no 97% consensus on AGW.



Bottom line there are no 97% or 95% consensus on support on AGW based on page 8 . just look at the table / graph. See figure 1a.1 in all the respondent that show 30.4% don't support the hypothesis.
added up all the blue colour in the figure of all respondents will only give you 66.6% support AGW.
The purple colour and the grey and the white colour in the chart in figure 1a.1 proves that they don't support the hypothesis. That give you 34.4%.
Only 66.6% support the hypothesis.

 

[Frankfooter]

Therefore your 95% consensus is garbage...97 % consesus is garbage too..

Here a peer review studies that debunk 97% consensus and link to original studies and data from moviefan which made you look like a fool and basketcase/ frankyfooter & you ( shack) look like a fool too.
See below quote by moviefan

Here's what the AAAS says about the consensus. Oh, they represent 120,000 scientists, so that's 120,000 scientists backing this statement.

1. Climate scientists agree: climate change is happening here and now. Based on well-established evidence, about 97% of climate scientists have concluded that human-caused climate change is happening. This agreement is documented not just by a single study, but by a converging stream of evidence over the past two decades from surveys of scientists, content analyses of peer-reviewed studies, and public statements issued by virtually every membership organization of experts in this field. Average global temperature has increased by about 1.4˚ F over the last 100 years. Sea level is rising, and some types of extreme events – such as heat waves and heavy precipitation events – are happening more frequently. Recent scientific findings indicate that climate change is likely responsible for the increase in the intensity of many of these events in recent years.

http://whatweknow.aaas.org/get-the-facts/

You lose!

 

[K Douglas]

Here's what the AAAS says about the consensus. Oh, they represent 120,000 scientists, so that's 120,000 scientists backing this statement.

http://whatweknow.aaas.org/get-the-facts/

You lose!

The AAAS has not done any climate research they are only trumpeting what the IPCC states. Most of the membership are not climate scientists and have likely never been scientifically polled as to whether they support the so called consensus. The AAAS does this mostly for one thing - funding.

 

[Frankfooter]

The AAAS has not done any climate research they are only trumpeting what the IPCC states. Most of the membership are not climate scientists and have likely never been scientifically polled as to whether they support the so called consensus. The AAAS does this mostly for one thing - funding.

Bullshit called!

The IPCC represents the work of climatology on the subject of climate change.
The AAAS represents the largest group of scientists in North America.

The AAAS supports the findings of the IPCC, which means that there are 120,000 scientists plus all of climatology on my side of the argument.
And on yours all you've got is larue, pornaddict and phil.

You lose!

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

I hearby state that Phil McNasty is not holding to the terms of the bet as we agreed to.
I have honoured the terms, admitted I've lost and posted the picture he chose according to the terms of the bet.
Since Phil has welched on his side of the bet, I hearby am entitled to stop honouring this bet.

Phil McNasty - You are a welcher and have broken the terms of our bet!

There were no terms that we agreed upon, you filthy welcher!!!

 

[Frankfooter]

There were no terms that we agreed upon, you filthy welcher!!!

You are the welcher, Phil.
Which is pretty frigging sad, if you ask me.
You won the bet and still welched!

All you had to do was admit that I was holding to the terms of the bet, but you refused and instead called me a welcher.
That means that you are the side that didn't hold to the terms, so you are the welcher here, not me.

Phil McNasty is a welcher!

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

You are the welcher, Phil.
Which is pretty frigging sad, if you ask me.
You won the bet and still welched!

All you had to do was admit that I was holding to the terms of the bet, but you refused and instead called me a welcher.
That means that you are the side that didn't hold to the terms, so you are the welcher here, not me.

Phil McNasty is a welcher!

Liar!!!

 

[Frankfooter]

Liar!!!

Its all there in my sig, welcher.

You mad, sweetpie?

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

Its all there in my sig, welcher.

You mad, sweetpie?

Everyone knew you'd try look for a way to welch on the bet. Thanks for proving us right

 

[Frankfooter]

Everyone knew you'd try look for a way to welch on the bet. Thanks for proving us right

Sorry, Phil, but you are the one who welched on the bet.
All you had to do was confirm that I was holding to the terms of the bet, as I clearly was, and apologize for calling me a welcher.
Instead, you refused to admit that I was honouring the bet, which meant you were welching on the terms we agreed to.
It takes a certain kind of loser to welch on a bet that they won.
Congrats in your new level of loserness!

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

It takes a certain kind of loser to welch on a bet that they won

Thanks for admitting that you are one

 

[Frankfooter]

Thanks for admitting that you are one

You think I won the bet, or are you admitting that you are that certain kind of welcher who welches on bets they won?
You're sounding a bit angry, sweetpie.

:flypig:

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

You think I won the bet, or are you admitting that you are that certain kind of welcher who welches on bets they won?
You're sounding a bit angry, sweetpie

Not angry at all. In fact I'm very happy you welched because it proves my judge of character is still very accurate.

So thanks Frankie :thumb:

 

[Frankfooter]

Not angry at all. In fact I'm very happy

Good for you, welcher.
I'm also glad you welched, as now I don't have to post any more of your racist crap.

 

[Phil C. McNasty]

 

[K Douglas]

Bullshit called!

The IPCC represents the work of climatology on the subject of climate change.
The AAAS represents the largest group of scientists in North America.

The AAAS supports the findings of the IPCC, which means that there are 120,000 scientists plus all of climatology on my side of the argument.
And on yours all you've got is larue, pornaddict and phil.

You lose!

You couldn't be more wrong. But I'd expect nothing less from an irrational left wing extremist snowflake.

 

[Frankfooter]

You couldn't be more wrong. But I'd expect nothing less from an irrational left wing extremist snowflake.

Hilarious.
Calling the AAAS, NASA and the IPCC 'irrational left wing extremists'.

The climate change denial conspiracies make the anti-vaxxers look intelligent.

 

[basketcase]

I fixed the quote for you so you can understand it better.....

Maybe you should fix your reading skills because I quoted the actual study data.


Only 0.6% of scientists deny human produced CO2 is playing a role in climate change.

 

[K Douglas]

Hilarious.
Calling the AAAS, NASA and the IPCC 'irrational left wing extremists'.

The climate change denial conspiracies make the anti-vaxxers look intelligent.

No I called you that. However, I can make the argument the IPCC exhibits some of those traits. They pose as a scientific organization but in reality are a political bureaucracy. NASA should stick to space travel. The AAAS is just playing ignorant.