Screening - are you okay with providing real info to providers?
- Thread starter JohnnyFever
- Start date
And what if that known provider happened to be in the industry a long time and had zero negative reviews posted anywhere but had always applied a real information policy?
Ok you have shown that you are nothing but a troll and an idiot. Sometimes I have to shake my head at the stupidity of some people. Don't worry I won't react to any further brilliance you might add to this thread.
I was hoping this thread wouldn't degenerate, but I guess that's life. I don't even understand the asuran/bobbiz thing, but go_jets_go just seems hostile for some reason. It is possible to choose not to provide real information while respecting why some are asking for it, you know. Complex issues, shades of grey, etc.
To those who provided good info here, thank you. The last time I was in Toronto, I stuck to asian agencies which asked for no references.
Hopefully it stays that way. It has gotten quite bad in the US to the point bookers want photo ID or your work info.
Hopefully it stays that way. It has gotten quite bad in the US to the point bookers want photo ID or your work info.
You were trying to start a conversation, the fact that it keeps coming up must mean people are opinioned on it.
There is a constant suggestion that if you don't like that an SP uses real iD or work phone confirmation, just move on and don't comment. Why? Especially if there are some comments here supporting it from some? You might want to ask guitarman if my scenario is far fetched. The risk of providing read id under current legislation should be known and not left to muting dissending comments on it.
Who is this guitarman that you speak of? Is he as wonderful and lovely as you?
Isn't it wonderful that you have a friend too? Yes, I think so.
I saw your reference to guitarman, but I'm not familiar with the story behind it. I do think it's a bit far-fetched to think the providers would deliberately use the information provided. Ethics aside, I can't think of an easier way to lose all your clients than to out one of them. It'd be very bad for business. I'm more concerned about accidental scenarios, given how poor even major corporations are at securing personal data.
Sure buddy, lets all leave our personal data to the shady prostitution business. I'm sure they can handle it better than major companies such like Facebook. Get real buddy. All it takes is one bad argument and there goes your info leaked. Client and escorts should both remain anonymous to each other.
Your username is pretty much the main reason I worry more about incompetence than malicious intent. But to each their own.
It should go without saying that giving any personal information to unknown Backpage/Leolist providers is asking for trouble. That guy’s experience is another cautionary tale.
How about don't give your personal info to any providers, period! The same applies to providers. Do not give your personal information to any clients, period!
Just to be clear. This is the standard way. That I was taught. It is not my unusual way. It is the just "the way".
