Bullshit.
Here's the thread from May 2015 where I made my bet with Frankfooter about the IPCC's predictions: https://terb.cc/vbulletin/showthrea...ing-Point%92&p=5243530&viewfull=1#post5243530. Anyone who wants to go through that thread will clearly see that I never said the temperature would stop rising. Unlike the global warming alarmists, I don't pretend to be able to predict the future.
I did correctly predict that the IPCC's predictions would remain spectacularly wrong. That was easy to predict, given that the predictions have been so far off the mark.
The reality is the IPCC has no idea how man-made emissions might affect the Earth's temperature, if at all. Its predictions have been completely wrong. There is no evidence that man-made emissions affect the Earth's temperature in any meaningful way, which is what the Nature article actually confirmed.
Fuji loses.
MF-2, you keep on repeating your favourite adjective "spectacularly" in terms of the predictions for climate change being wrong.
Articles have been posted here which do not deny AGW, although some say the predictions may not be as worse as previously predicted, but none give the impression that they are "spectacularly wrong".
The only people that I've heard that say CC does not exist are types like Ted Cruz (during his campaign).
Even NASA says man-made CO2 is an important contributor to CC.
Look at the climactic disasters happening around this planet (and many in the USA). Look at the poles. Look at the receding ice-capped peaks and glaciers. You mean to tell me that there's no scientist who has attributed this phenomenon to something else other than man-made CO2 emissions and deforestation?
Don't you think that if there was another factor or factors that contributed to it in a "meaningful" way, that it would be apparent to a few reputable, independent scientists?