Won't be published in a magazine that relies on peer pressure to insure the article tows the line.Let me know when you find an article published in a top journal like Nature or Science. Until then, stop wasting my time.
Won't be published in a magazine that relies on peer pressure to insure the article tows the line.Let me know when you find an article published in a top journal like Nature or Science. Until then, stop wasting my time.
Which has nothing whatsoever to do with peer review. At the good journals like Nature or Science the peer reviewers identities are not revealed to the authors entirely eliminating any possibility of peer pressure or other under influence.Won't be published in a magazine that relies on peer pressure to insure the article tows the line.
I see so the water level is rising, but there will be a drought.I stand by the prediction. The areas that are farmable will change. In Canada the prairies will experience drought and while the Canadian shield will grow more trees, it isn't farmable.
I realize that you are a confused person. I gave you specific reasons you haven't answered so here they are again:I see so the water level is rising, but there will be a drought.
Its a bit confusing, I always thought water didnt leave our atmosphere but rather just came back down after it evaporated.
My god fuji,...get some sleep,...who gives a shit who the reviewers identities are,...the magazines are the peer pressure,...follow the party line,...or don't get published,...its really not that complicated,...well for some anyway.Which has nothing whatsoever to do with peer review. At the good journals like Nature or Science the peer reviewers identities are not revealed to the authors entirely eliminating any possibility of peer pressure or other under influence..
Oh you mean like in the dirty 30's,...when climate change or is it global warming now,...was something the west could only dream of,....I realize that you are a confused person. I gave you specific reasons you haven't answered so here they are again:
The areas that are farmable will change. In Canada the prairies will experience drought and while the Canadian shield will grow more trees, it isn't farmable.
Understood, Canada will turn into a desert.I realize that you are a confused person. I gave you specific reasons you haven't answered so here they are again:
The areas that are farmable will change. In Canada the prairies will experience drought and while the Canadian shield will grow more trees, it isn't farmable.
The prairies may. Are you illiterate??? What's your problem with simple English. You really have trouble understanding anything, which certainly explains a lot about why you believe so many dumb things.Understood, Canada will turn into a desert.
Notice how the more I try to piece together what you are saying the more idiotic I sound? Ok so im with you fuji, rising water levels, prarie deserts, what else? Any religious events or does that come much later?The prairies may. Are you illiterate??? What's your problem with simple English. You really have trouble understanding anything, which certainly explains a lot about why you believe so many dumb things.
Rising SEA levels, drought in the Prairies (look at a map: FAR from the sea).Notice how the more I try to piece together what you are saying the more idiotic I sound? Ok so im with you fuji, rising water levels, prarie deserts, what else? Any religious events or does that come much later?
So nothing new then,...Rising SEA levels, drought in the Prairies (look at a map: FAR from the sea).
Nobody knows what nonsense you are babbling about. The dust bowl in the thirties exactly highlights what drought does to the prairies.So nothing new then,...
But keeps nature magazines in business,... though not informed enough to have heard of the dirty 30's.
Nobody knows what nonsense you are babbling about. The dust bowl in the thirties exactly highlights what drought does to the prairies.
Your are staking your credibility versus Nature's.Let me try to decifer your Engwish.
1st,..."Nobody knows",...can only mean that you are nobody,...and you don't know,...
WOW,...didn't know what the consequences of a drought was,...thanks for that fuji,...
But as far as the dirty 30's,...that actually highlights the incompetence of nature magazines,...and anybody who is deemed incompetent enough,...and/or willing to toe the company line,... to be allowed to publish in them.
Might as well stake your credibility versus Uniforum,...the Unifor magazine,...just another biased magazine.Your are staking your credibility versus Nature's.
You lose.
Climate change isn't a scam, its real always has been always will be. The scam is when people start blaming it on C02 emission.If climate change is a scam, why is the City of Miami spending so much money on seawalls?
http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170403-miamis-fight-against-sea-level-rise
Not one of them is credible enough to get published in a respectable journal.
Look up the word respectable. Show me something in a top journal like Nature or Science.