I've been surfing a few Sugar Daddy/baby sites lately and I find it odd that so many babes are looking for rather high monthly allowances yet insist on NSA. So in other words, I cough up a monthly allowance for what ? No strings attached ?. That's Front money. That's like getting paid in advance and then deciding not to show up for work. When I was 15, I fronted a guy $20 for an ounce of weed and the next thing I knew he was gone. ( Got him back about 6 months later but that's another story) It's good for her if some dumb dork actually throws down the cash - but Fat fucking chance that's going to happen with this boy. So fellow Daddies - what's your story on this ?
Sugar Baby wants a monthly allowance but NSA ?
- Thread starter rogerdodger
- Start date
Some of these gals are "arm candy" only, so you pay her to show her but nothing more, the same kind of idea of buying a sports car.
not my thing of course, but we live in freedom, so if these ladies find a daddy, good for them, not my problem... and some people have a lot of money in this city
At the end of the day, if you have the money, you have a lot of power to negociate an arrangement that works for you,
not my thing of course, but we live in freedom, so if these ladies find a daddy, good for them, not my problem... and some people have a lot of money in this city
At the end of the day, if you have the money, you have a lot of power to negociate an arrangement that works for you,
I think SBing should be treated as work, except meals/gifts if any. So, work first, then pay. Be it per meet or otherwise.
(I personally don't do monthly because, among other things, I aim to have maximum SBs at any given time, and as a result I cannot see any one of them more than 2, maximum 3 times a month.)
PS - maybe NSA simply means that you cannot demand exclusivity or demand always being on stand by waiting for your call, or exchanging 200 messages a day?
That's what I was going to say. In the context of a SB, it only means you or she can't freak out if someone is sleeping with other people.
This is the fun of free choice/markets (whatever they may be). You can cut your own deal with whomever under whatever terms you like. Other peoples' opinions or what they might want are irrelevant. This would not be my cup of tea, but who cares? As long as there is no deception.
Sugar babies are for the guys/ladies who don't want to admit that it is escorting. For guys on there, they don't want feel like they are paying for it and they want to think its a "real relationship" but the girls on there simply want the money and are escorts themselves. I gave it a whirl.. it's MESSY and guys never keep up their end of the bargain. I prefer escorting 100%.
0
Agreed, If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck..............................................
NSA is just another clause the needs to be discussed in "the contract"
all successful arrangements would "grow" from a few meetings a month, when there is probably not a lot of trust between the parties, into hopefully some kind of money driven but still respectful and fun relationship. So of course don't get into a relationship with a crackhead/ airhead
And not all sugar daddies are looking for NSA. For what I understand it adds a $$$ premium.
I know a gal that used to be an extraordinary escort; I think she was with EyeCandy; long story short she got into a +$4.5K a month arrangement that required her to stop escorting... and as far as I know she didn't come back to escorting, so I hope she is doing well
all successful arrangements would "grow" from a few meetings a month, when there is probably not a lot of trust between the parties, into hopefully some kind of money driven but still respectful and fun relationship. So of course don't get into a relationship with a crackhead/ airhead
And not all sugar daddies are looking for NSA. For what I understand it adds a $$$ premium.
I know a gal that used to be an extraordinary escort; I think she was with EyeCandy; long story short she got into a +$4.5K a month arrangement that required her to stop escorting... and as far as I know she didn't come back to escorting, so I hope she is doing well
Only platonic = possibly trying to avoid problems with LE. Especially in God's cuntry/USA & N. Korea.
I dont see the point, about the last thing I would want from a 20yo airhead is conversation./QUOTE]
Lmfao. This has been my opinion of SC dancers for the past several years.
Like driving a sports car? No way. You drive that baby hard and can look under the hood too. :biggrin-new:
