Sugar Baby without sex? Are they serious?

[jackjackjohnson]

I notice an increase in sugar babies, asking 5-8K a month, who want to be "eye candy" or "friends" but no sex.
Are there men stupid enough to actually pay some, who most likely is dumb as nails, to spend just normal time with?

I figure they are trolls or just dreamers but I see a lot of them

 

[rhuarc29]

Um, yes, there are plenty such arrangements already in existence.

I've never been interested in a Sugar Baby relationship, whether sex is involved or not. Such an arrangement just feels wrong to me.
Yes, I'll pay for some great sex and excellent companionship, but it's a transaction that covers a very short period of time. In the rare cases it moves beyond that, I no longer offer financial compensation.
A Sugar Daddy/Baby relationship is something more involving; something that just feels soiled IMO. It moves beyond a short-term want into a shallow fulfillment of a long-term desire.

 

[Celticman]

I figure they are trolls or just dreamers but I see a lot of them

For 5-8K per month and no sex? They must think that when they fart that fairy dust emanates from their anus

 

[HobbyHorse]

No, they probably are not serious JJJ.

I believe when an obvious escort advertses stipulates she accepts payment for companionship "only" it is an obvious fiction to all.. done tongue in cheek (my cheek preferably).

Perhaps they believe there is some legal advantage in positioning their business as non-sexual... Though with the advent of the new legal approach to prostitution that advantage would presumably go not to the SP but to her client ("Honest officer... Sure I was strupping her, but that's because she likes me... I was only paying for companionship, see, like it says right here in her ad!")

Also with a "sugar baby" perhaps its as much what she is telling herself... I'm not really a whore... Yeah I'll take his money but I won't sleep with him unless I like him. But if he's not an asshole she'll decide in the end that liking his money = liking him enough for sex.

 

[oral.com]

I notice an increase in sugar babies, asking 5-8K a month, who want to be "eye candy" or "friends" but no sex.
Are there men stupid enough to actually pay some, who most likely is dumb as nails, to spend just normal time with?

I figure they are trolls or just dreamers but I see a lot of them

That's an absurd demand, usually put out by very immature young women with unrealistic expectations. I've been in a number of SD/SB relationships, they are not cheap but the rewards have more substance. The connection is more genuine, and the sex does not involve a clock. It takes time to find the right girl, like real dating.

 

[alan9080]

In addition to "no sex," they expect the daddy to mentor them and take them on a shopping spree.
Also, they expect the daddy to look like George Clooney or Keanu Reeves. This is what happens when mothers read too many fairytales to these girls and call the princess.

 

[oil&gas]

Sex may not be absolutely essential to a sugar daddy
in his 70's or 80's.

 

[jackjackjohnson]

bitter much, lol?

there was a girl in new york with an arrangement like this. it's rare, but it definitely happens. some rich men who have ED or whatever seek this kind of stuff and when they find the right girl to hit it off with, then it's a win-win for both parties.

and then all the other broke and bitter lonely old men whine about it.

You sound 10x more bitter than he is. No rich man I know is an idiot and no rich man I know would pay anyone including Princess kate that money to talk about Gossip Girls.
Personally I think it's all bullshit. I also personally think all these "I know a girl in NY" stories are complete bullshit also.

There is a reason why 75% of Sugar babies quit the site and bitch about all "the flakes' who won't pay them 5k to talk to some dumb 19 year old. The reason is you don't have to. I got some dime pieces for less than 3k per month, unlimited sex and was very happy to watch them leave. It was all sex when I wanted and how I wanted.
For me to give anyone more than 3k per month she would have to shit out golden eggs and then maybe I pay.

I wold like to meet ONE verified "daddy/idiot" who does the no sex thing. I don't think he really exist.

 

[ElCapitain]

I'm not sure what is surprising about this beyond the cost. I wouldn't pay $5k a month for this, but for the right person $1k would be fine for this type of relationship. I mean, therapists in this city charge $175+/hr. As long as you're getting a couple hours a week with someone you click with and genuine, non-judgmental conversation, seems fair.

 

[GPIDEAL]

Sex may not be absolutely essential to a sugar daddy
in his 70's or 80's.

Exactly. Or someone older who isn't an octogenarian but who has trouble having sex.

 

[GPIDEAL]

You sound 10x more bitter than he is. No rich man I know is an idiot and no rich man I know would pay anyone including Princess kate that money to talk about Gossip Girls.
Personally I think it's all bullshit. I also personally think all these "I know a girl in NY" stories are complete bullshit also.

There is a reason why 75% of Sugar babies quit the site and bitch about all "the flakes' who won't pay them 5k to talk to some dumb 19 year old. The reason is you don't have to. I got some dime pieces for less than 3k per month, unlimited sex and was very happy to watch them leave. It was all sex when I wanted and how I wanted.
For me to give anyone more than 3k per month she would have to shit out golden eggs and then maybe I pay.

I wold like to meet ONE verified "daddy/idiot" who does the no sex thing. I don't think he really exist.

I think those situations do exist. But I also think that a lot of SB wannabees have high expectations too.

 

[jackjackjohnson]

ok, mr-ranty-rant. if you can get such good pussy for so little money, why do you have your panties caught up in a bunch over this then? clearly it works for some people, otherwise there wouldn't be women advertising it.

getting pissed off to the extent that you're whining to a whole forum about a woman putting out an ad that is clearly not targeting you is the definition of bitterness.

You seem obnoxiously bitter. Never caught your "fish/fool", huh?

Anyways you have ZERO clue what my finances are. I can be dirt poor or very wealthy. It means jack. Smart people with big money have big money for a reason. They buy low, sell high. There are literally 100o's of Sugarbabies competing for a 3k sugar daddy and you think some 5/10 who does Yoga 1x a week is some kind of "catch"? LOL,

I just want to meet the Bigfoot. That's all. Don't think he exists but I keep trying.

 

[tmasters]

Seems very plausible to me. There are a lot of people who would give money and fulfill Amazon wishlists to webcam model just to get a chance to interact with an attractive woman. A lot of people don't get these chances to this and so pay for it. If one is of a wealthier status, it wouldn't be a stretch to say that they would have a companion ship with somebody for $5k+ per month. Having said that, I wouldn't do it, but I could see other people do it.

 

[asuran]

Seems very plausible to me. There are a lot of people who would give money and fulfill Amazon wishlists to webcam model just to get a chance to interact with an attractive woman. A lot of people don't get these chances to this and so pay for it. If one is of a wealthier status, it wouldn't be a stretch to say that they would have a companion ship with somebody for $5k+ per month. Having said that, I wouldn't do it, but I could see other people do it.

True, it does happen. We just don't know who is doing it.
It's just naive to think this doesn't happen.
Unlike the majority of us, $5k to some people are just lose change.

We just have it good with the rates we pay for SPs here in Toronto and Canada in general.

 

[Peterpeckerer]

There are guys who just pay for the companionship during a session. Sometimes it is just sitting talking with the lady; sometimes cuddling, sometimes ED just gets in the way.
My guesstimate is that a lot of the experienced ladies here could tell you about a non-sexual session.

 

[oldjones]

I notice an increase in sugar babies, asking 5-8K a month, who want to be "eye candy" or "friends" but no sex.
Are there men stupid enough to actually pay some, who most likely is dumb as nails, to spend just normal time with?

I figure they are trolls or just dreamers but I see a lot of them

I understand there are men stupid enough to pay over a hundred thousand — about 8K amonth plus insurance, taxes and incidentals — to drive around in a car that they think of as "eye candy" when a mere five thou would purchase good reliable transportation. Your values are yours; who made you judge of someone with different values?

Besides, not only do some guys like the challenge of seduction, and have the money to set up the game any way they want. And I'm sure you remember story of Bernard Shaw and the society lady at the dinner party, who said she'd be honoured to sleep with the Great Man if he offered a thousand pounds for the pleasure, but took offence when he said, 'What about for two shilling?"

Haggling over price has it's attractions too.

 

[Peterpeckerer]

t. And I'm sure you remember story of Bernard Shaw and the society lady at the dinner party, who said she'd be honoured to sleep with the Great Man if he offered a thousand pounds for the pleasure, but took offence when he said, 'What about for two shilling?"

Haggling over price has it's attractions too.

Often used as a Churchill quote, which it is not. I cannot find the Shaw reference though.

https://richardlangworth.com/non-churchill-quotes-a-porny-issue

“Churchill: "Madam, would you sleep with me for five million pounds?" Socialite: "My goodness, Mr. Churchill... Well, I suppose... we would have to discuss terms, of course... "
Churchill: "Would you sleep with me for five pounds?"
Socialite: "Mr. Churchill, what kind of woman do you think I am?!" Churchill: "Madam, we've already established that. Now we are haggling about the price”

 

[wangbang]

I have a few pornstars on one of my Twitter accounts. You would be amazed by how many guys buy them things on their "wishlist" for which the lady will send them a few private pics. Some of the ladies will post pics of the weekly deliveries and it looks like a department store. And the price some guys pay just to face chat with them!!!

Face it, as proven in the review sections here, there are a lot of men who will pay a lot of money just to suck up and/or get some attention from a hot lady.

 

[Butler1000]

Often used as a Churchill quote, which it is not. I cannot find the Shaw reference though.

https://richardlangworth.com/non-churchill-quotes-a-porny-issue

“Churchill: "Madam, would you sleep with me for five million pounds?" Socialite: "My goodness, Mr. Churchill... Well, I suppose... we would have to discuss terms, of course... "
Churchill: "Would you sleep with me for five pounds?"
Socialite: "Mr. Churchill, what kind of woman do you think I am?!" Churchill: "Madam, we've already established that. Now we are haggling about the price”

Also attributed to Oscar Wilde. Commonality seems to be a large mixed British dinner party for higher society types.

Thinking not Churchill as I can't see a politician doing that. Wilde absolutely.

 

[jackjackjohnson]

I have a few pornstars on one of my Twitter accounts. You would be amazed by how many guys buy them things on their "wishlist" for which the lady will send them a few private pics. Some of the ladies will post pics of the weekly deliveries and it looks like a department store. And the price some guys pay just to face chat with them!!!

Face it, as proven in the review sections here, there are a lot of men who will pay a lot of money just to suck up and/or get some attention from a hot lady.

Yes and that's why all of them retire wealthy and secure....just like Asia Carrera and her millionaire fan boys huh?

People lie dude.