In fact, NASA's data showed 2014 was no warmer than 2005 or 2010 (the differences reported by NASA were significantly less than the margin of error). Temperatures went up in 2015 due to the super El Nino weather phenomenon.
Apart from the super El Nino (and we won't really know where things currently stand until the El Nino and possible La Nina trends have ended), temperatures in the 21st century have been stagnant.
The temperature is going to go up in a two steps forward, one step back fashion. You will always be blaming super El Ninos that will always be getting hotter than the previous one.
The 5 year running average in 2005 and 2010 was .63, the most recent one was .7, clearly refuting the denier prediction in the video that there would be cooling. And yes we should be looking at running averages, and those have been going up under year with the exception of 2008, 2005, 2000, 1993, 1990, and prior to 1984.
In fact the definition of climate is weather averaged over 30 years so we should be looking at nothing less than 30 year running averages, otherwise we are talking about weather, not climate.
AGW predicts warming over centuries. When you look at the prehistoric events where there was greenhouse warming triggered by CO2 the temperatures rose dramatically, and led to mass extinctions, but not in a straight line. There were long stretches of deviation from the overall warming trend.
This is why anybody sane regresses the numbers or at least uses a running average. The NASA data included a5 year running average but it should actually by a 30 year running average to fit the definition that anything less than 30 years is weather, rather than climate.
Your analysis of years in isolation not averaged over 30+ years is stupid to begin with.
