9/11 Fourteen Years Later

[TESLAMotors]

The above youtube geek, actually, he worked for Bush as well as the Criminal Justice System.
Youtube is his gas money job since he has a channel and more views than PewDeePie.............(sarcasm, feel it?)

 

[TESLAMotors]

Did Tesla ever explain how they got the debris to only hit certain buildings (while also falling straight down)?

Well, let me catch you up.

Btw, nice to see you say "falling straight down" about the two big towers.
Ironically, I've been asking you, GP and fuji if these side by side comparisons of the buildings collapsing look similar, NO SIMPLE answer and all it requires is a YES/NO.

So yes or no, do the above buildings look similar in how they collapse?
Can you man up to a simple question and answer or will you deflect, ignore, etc the question?
GP/fuji can't seem to answer something so simple.

 

[Titalian]

Stop asking him things he will not answer in contradiction to his belief.
Is only motive is to be right. And when he is shot down in certain threads
He never has the balls to say, your right I was wrong. He just disappears.
And starts up some other controversial bias on a different thread. He might be
Somewhat intellectual, but in reality he's a very small man.

 

[fuji]

You guys have added nothing since you lost the debate:

Twin towers collapsed from the impact sites destroying your bullshit claims about controlled demolition.

Everybody and their dog knew WTC7 was so badly damaged it was going to collapse, so no mystery there.

Throwing up sand in the form of a never ending stream of crackpots spouting nonsense on YouTube does not save you from these two facts definitively refuting your idiot conspiracy theory.

 

[GPIDEAL]

And you might be carrying a suitcase with six pounds of cocaine and a severed head.

I love how you take innocuous things, then use the word "might" to start spewing ludicrous bullshit.

Fuji,

It's six Kilos of cocaine (or 6 kees lol).

 

[twizz]

 

[GPIDEAL]

On the morning of September 13, 2001 Fox News began reporting searchers found a cockpit with a body inside two blocks
south of the World Trade complex outside the pile. No pictures or video ever shown or seen of the claim.
The cockpit and hijacker body are never mentioned in any official investigation. Somebody was telling fat plane lies.

T, don't rely on initial, UNCONFIRMED, news reports.

I can tell you from my years of studying the Kennedy Assassination, that there were many initial news reports that were incorrect too.

Probably the same with 9/11, but if you want to believe this one (I can't see how a body would be recovered after crashing nose first into a building), it at least confirms that the person in the cockpit was NOT an airline pilot but a hijacker, probably from Al Qaeda and against the theory of a controlled-demolition.

 

[GPIDEAL]

So this video, has a youtube geek, no one important really, but for a youtube geek, he makes some great points
A few at 9:10
but more eye opening at 10:03 until 11:00 (just a minute to watch)

No plane like cut-out at Pentagon. Just a few broken windows and some soot on the outside. lol
http://i.imgur.com/z9aPnVv.jpg

TESLA, the Pentagon was a reinforced concrete structure if not huge blocks of stone and concrete. Only the fuselage core bore a hole through the wall.

The WTC was designed with structural steel-frame, the interior comprising 95% air as they say. It's curtain wall was not solid. Therefore, the planes created a hole of their silhouette for the impact point.

 

[GPIDEAL]

Well, let me catch you up.

Btw, nice to see you say "falling straight down" about the two big towers.
Ironically, I've been asking you, GP and fuji if these side by side comparisons of the buildings collapsing look similar, NO SIMPLE answer and all it requires is a YES/NO.

So yes or no, do the above buildings look similar in how they collapse?
Can you man up to a simple question and answer or will you deflect, ignore, etc the question?
GP/fuji can't seem to answer something so simple.

It can't be honestly answered because you don't show the full picture and conveniently leave out the sound.

All those buildings on the right side have explosive detonations which you probably can hear if the sound was on and see if you show the original, complete videos.

Why do you keep on repeating this misleading video snippet?

You are not in search of the truth if you omit crucial information in your analysis. This shows your bias.

 

[GPIDEAL]

Titalian, stop watching nonsense on YouTube. You make a fool of yourself. You criticising mainstream media and then mindlessly believing absolute garbage on YouTube is fucking priceless.

Fox news, the least credible of the mainstream media outlets, is about a billion times more credible than this utter shit you post.

Some say that the internet is a beacon for the truth since it is not controlled by state-licensed main stream media corporations, however, it is also the wild, wild west of communication and ideas, which can be deceptive and wrong.

 

[fuji]

Some say that the internet is a beacon for the truth since it is not controlled by state-licensed main stream media corporations, however, it is also the wild, wild west of communication and ideas, which can be deceptive and wrong.

Believing anything posted by anybody with a YouTube account is just pathetic.

 

[GPIDEAL]

You guys have to listen to this !

Why? More idiotic yammering uploaded by trolls?

I only watched 10 minutes. Too busy now. But THIS I can believe - that perhaps the CIA knew about it but didn't do much about it.

It is also plausible because of past conduct. Eg., we now know for a fact, that both the CIA and the FBI were not honest with the Warren Commission, and the CIA continued to leave out much information from the House Select Committee on Assassinations.

 

[fuji]

I only watched 10 minutes. Too busy now. But THIS I can believe - that perhaps the CIA knew about it but didn't do much about it.

It is also plausible because of past conduct. Eg., we now know for a fact, that both the CIA and the FBI were not honest with the Warren Commission, and the CIA continued to leave out much information from the House Select Committee on Assassinations.

Let's be clear that uploading a screed to YouTube has no more credibility than posting it to terb.

The T-clowns seem to think that uploading to YouTube confers some credibility....

 

[GPIDEAL]

Believing anything posted by anybody with a YouTube account is just pathetic.

Correct.

You must vet it.

 

[GPIDEAL]

Let's be clear that uploading a screed to YouTube has no more credibility than posting it to terb.

The T-clowns seem to think that uploading to YouTube confers some credibility....

Not instant credibility but the interviews seem plausible by whistle blowers. This doesn't deal with controlled demolition.

You Tube also includes excellent or first rate documentaries, etc. that have appeared on TV.

 

[Titalian]

Keep in mind that Saudi Royalty and the Bush family are locked at the hip.

After walking out of closed doors for three hours with the 911 commission, he seemed to be less cocky than normal and little uneasy just my perspective.

Keep in mind that my only mission on this thread is to get to the bottom of this, whether it was controlled demolition or nukes
or planes really doesn't matter to me, I feel the country was betrayed and many died because of it. Even Canadians. In other
words I smell a rat. This is why the administration censored 28 pages from the original 911 report. As I said these documents
are the key.

Not instant credibility but the interviews seem plausible by whistle blowers. This doesn't deal with controlled demolition.

Keep in mind what I stated on the post above you.

 

[GPIDEAL]

Keep in mind what I stated on the post above you.

Okay but it sounds like you're shifting your view away from it being a false flag operation.

Now, what part is censored? I bought a copy of the report years ago but it's tucked in my library. Is it redacted or 'censored' with missing pages? I don't remember seeing that.

Or are the files supporting it locked away?

 

[Titalian]

Okay but it sounds like you're shifting your view away from it being a false flag operation.

Now, what part is censored? I bought a copy of the report years ago but it's tucked in my library. Is it redacted or 'censored' with missing pages? I don't remember seeing that.

Or are the files supporting it locked away?

This part http://28pages.org/ and their locked away. I still say it was a false flag operation, to corner us into the state we are in today, where our rights have been stripped from us.

 

[Titalian]

Okay but it sounds like you're shifting your view away from it being a false flag operation.

Now, what part is censored? I bought a copy of the report years ago but it's tucked in my library. Is it redacted or 'censored' with missing pages? I don't remember seeing that.

Or are the files supporting it locked away?

http://28pages.org/2015/09/11/former-fbi-agent-mark-rossini-driven-to-expose-cias-911-secret/

 

[fuji]

Not instant credibility but the interviews seem plausible by whistle blowers. This doesn't deal with controlled demolition.

You Tube also includes excellent or first rate documentaries, etc. that have appeared on TV.

They don't seem plausible to me. A lot of total bullshit gets uploaded. People claiming to be whistleblowers who actually have no real knowledge, etc.

One of the videos on this thread had a guy who is billed as a demolitions expert when he was only the uneducated blue collar construction worker who was hired to place explosives where he was told, not an expert at all.

That is the sort of tripe the the gullibleT-clowns are lapping up and passing of as information.