9/11 Fourteen Years Later

TESLAMotors

Banned
Apr 23, 2014
2,404
1
0
Babble on mindlessly as long as you like. Anyone with eyes can go look at the videos and see that the top half of the building above the impact site falls onto the motionless bottom half below.

So much for your "YouTube expert ".
lol angry? Name calling "youtube expert"? Didn't we clarify that YouTube is just a platform/medium?

Yes the top half collapses, sure, a few sticks and stones, debris from WTC 1/2 miraculously fall onto this particular building which happens to be WTC7 and which just happens to implode onto its own footprint, EXACTLY like a demolition building would.
Almost PERFECTLY in a symmetrical fashion, straight down.
No other buildings are compromised in such a way, hmmmm.....

It's AMAZING.

Again, thanks for showing the blatant dishonesty on your part. :D
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
Because people who build buildings know exactly how they are supposed to collapse.
Precisely. It is their job to plan for every conceivable situation of stresses on the building and determine what effect each of those stresses will have. They also would have calculated to the Newton how much force at certain points would cause failure. That is their job and why you have to be certified as an engineer before you can work in the field.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
Building at 1:36 looks a LOT like WTC 7, EXCEPT that debris and fires cuased WTC 7's collapse. lol...
Interesting. A video with superficial similarities to WTC 7 is supposed to prove that the two towers (with completely different designs) were demolished?

And wonder why people accuse conspiracy theorists of jumping to a new topic every time their arguments are imploded?
 

TESLAMotors

Banned
Apr 23, 2014
2,404
1
0
It would also mean that the people on those floors would have to have seen the massive prep work and that there were invisible explosives on the exterior structural members.

Incorrect, you gun create a work order in the guise of "asbestos removal, elevator repair, electrical work" etc, etc and nobody would be the wiser in questioning the people in work outfits and hard hats.
Or they could have done this at night and voila it's all done.
Wiring can be hidden, it doesn't have to be in your face, smack across the middle of every hallway and/or corridor.
False ceilings, you know what those are right?

Do you see cables for the power/utilities anywhere in the majority of this video? No.....
How about support structures? Any blatant concrete and rebar protruding in the video? No....
Amazing what dry wall and false ceilings can do eh?
 

Titalian

No Regrets
Nov 27, 2012
8,490
9
0
Everywhere
Hey Tes, I'm keeping the best for last Lol
 

TESLAMotors

Banned
Apr 23, 2014
2,404
1
0
Interesting. A video with superficial similarities to WTC 7 is supposed to prove that the two towers (with completely different designs) were demolished?

And wonder why people accuse conspiracy theorists of jumping to a new topic every time their arguments are imploded?
AMAZING IS EXACTLY the word I was thinking.


AMAZING how debris and fire from WTC 1/2 fell on WTC 7 and created SUCH destruction that it fell PERFECTLY straight down.
From CHAOS you get a symmetrical freefall "+40%" LOL implosion of a building.

AMAZING! ;)
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
...

The building falls picture perfectly onto its own footprint,...
Actual demolitions fall in their footprint because they are designed that way to prevent damage to other buildings. If tens of thousands of Americans were in on a conspiracy to kill thousands more Americans do you think they would care if the tower fell sideways?

More scientifically though, it fell roughly in its footprint because of the way the building was designed. As soon as the elements holding the floor in place failed, it had nowhere to go but straight down.

Also worth noting is that controlled demolitions start at the bottom but for the towers it is quite obvious that the failure occurred where the planes hit.
 

Titalian

No Regrets
Nov 27, 2012
8,490
9
0
Everywhere
Incorrect, you gun create a work order in the guise of "asbestos removal, elevator repair, electrical work" etc, etc and nobody would be the wiser in questioning the people in work outfits and hard hats.
Or they could have done this at night and voila it's all done.
Wiring can be hidden, it doesn't have to be in your face, smack across the middle of every hallway and/or corridor.
False ceilings, you know what those are right?

Do you see cables for the power/utilities anywhere in the majority of this video? No.....
How about support structures? Any blatant concrete and rebar protruding in the video? No....
Amazing what dry wall and false ceilings can do eh?
Plus there was a 30hr power outage 6 days prior.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
Incorrect, you gun create a work order in the guise of "asbestos removal, elevator repair, electrical work" etc, etc and nobody would be the wiser in questioning the people in work outfits and hard hats....
Interior structural members could be doable with enough time and enough skilled technicians but the exterior of the towers were significant load bearing members. That means they would have to be wrapped in explosives and taken out. Pretty clear that there are no explosives evident on the exterior so either they were invisible or not there.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
AMAZING IS EXACTLY the word I was thinking.


AMAZING how debris and fire from WTC 1/2 fell on WTC 7 and created SUCH destruction that it fell PERFECTLY straight down.
From CHAOS you get a symmetrical freefall "+40%" LOL implosion of a building.

AMAZING! ;)
Again your change of topic....

You are asking how is it possible that a building with significant exterior damage and a uncontrollable fire inside would collapse down?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
Plus there was a 30hr power outage 6 days prior.
Is 30 hours enough to cut away significant areas of drywall, plant explosives, remove all the dust and return everything to exactly where they came from in two 110 story buildings?
 

TESLAMotors

Banned
Apr 23, 2014
2,404
1
0
Actual demolitions fall in their footprint because they are designed that way to prevent damage to other buildings.
Thank you.

If tens of thousands of Americans were in on a conspiracy to kill thousands more Americans do you think they would care if the tower fell sideways?
IRONICALLY enough, it seems only the buildings that Silverstein had took out a new lease on, along with insurance AND (someone mentioned earlier) it included for the first time, terrorist attacks by "chance". LMAO
Silverstein’s insurance plan happened to cover terrorist attacks “by chance”.
http://realitieswatch.com/larry-sil...ths-911-got-4-55-billion-insurance-buildings/

More scientifically though, it fell roughly in its footprint because of the way the building was designed.
AMAZING. If you have a source, I'd enjoy reading it, please do.

As soon as the elements holding the floor in place failed, it had nowhere to go but straight down.
Right, I forgot, debris, and a tenth floor fire = equated to a COMPLETE building failure.
Btw that column was near the corner of the building, for the record.


Also worth noting is that controlled demolitions start at the bottom but for the towers it is quite obvious that the failure occurred where the planes hit.
No planes hit WTC 7, just noting your comment here.
 

TESLAMotors

Banned
Apr 23, 2014
2,404
1
0
Is 30 hours enough to cut away significant areas of drywall, plant explosives, remove all the dust and return everything to exactly where they came from in two 110 story buildings?
It's probably more than sufficient time to PLANT THEM in the prepped area YEARS before and as Sal79 mentioned, crews could work at night round the clock, no questions asked.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
It's probably more than sufficient time to PLANT THEM in the prepped area YEARS before and as Sal79 mentioned, crews could work at night round the clock, no questions asked.
110 floors? Two buildings?

And that whole exterior thing?

And of course your theory of prepping for an attack years in advance with no one speaking a word?
 

TESLAMotors

Banned
Apr 23, 2014
2,404
1
0
Again your change of topic....

You are asking how is it possible that a building with significant exterior damage and a uncontrollable fire inside would collapse down?
Yes, when you consider that the US Postal building was MUCH closer in proximity to the twin towers.
Yes, when you consider that one column (in the corner) of the structure was compromised in to a degree by debris and fire and again, collapsed symmetrically down, LIKE a building in a demolition would.

You can't leave out the symmetry, it's important here.


Another question, the debris that fell from the brother buildings WTC 1/2, did all that debris somehow just go through all the floors with such velocity that it went through to the bottom? half way?
Are we to honestly believe that? lol


Again, AMAZING, no other buildings were harmed in the making of 9/11...............JUST WTCs.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
...
AMAZING. If you have a source, I'd enjoy reading it, please do.

...
Really? In all your extensive research you don't understand the basics of the building construction?

To put it simple enough for you, floors were suspended between the core and the exterior so as soon as the fastenings failed, all that is left is gravity.
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
Yes, when you consider that the US Postal building was MUCH closer in proximity to the twin towers.
Yes, when you consider that one ...
Again, AMAZING, no other buildings were harmed in the making of 9/11...............JUST WTCs.
Wow. You might actually want to look into that.
 

TESLAMotors

Banned
Apr 23, 2014
2,404
1
0
110 floors? Two buildings?

And that whole exterior thing?
I never use memes but in this case.....


And of course your theory of prepping for an attack years in advance with no one speaking a word?
Everyone has a price, including governments, shady (that's redundant) politicians, military (industrial complex) $$$$$, oil/gas, etc, etc... Halliburton (ironically, Cheney's ol fav), blackwater...............

It's amazing what money and influence can do, it's just as amazing as .................debris and fire randomly falling down and hitting a building and causing it to collapse, symmetrically.
One column failed in the corner of the structure and debris took care of the rest. Other buildings were perfectly fine in the area.............that kind of amazing.
AMAZING.
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,996
5,600
113
Really? In all your extensive research you don't understand the basics of the building construction?

To put it simple enough for you, floors were suspended between the core and the exterior so as soon as the fastenings failed, all that is left is gravity.
You simply are unable to read what you write yourself. Try to read it carefully:

floors were suspended between the core and the exterior so as soon as the fastenings failed, all that is left is gravity



Test: what will be left standing?
 

basketcase

Well-known member
Dec 29, 2005
62,630
7,076
113
Free fall is not possible, if there's an obstruction in the way.
Free fall didn't happen except with chunks of the building from above. Thousands of pictures and videos show the pieces falling faster than the building.

Then again, thousands of pictures and videos clearly show the failure happening at the point where the planes crashed, not at the bottom like in a controlled demolition yet you guys still hold to that fantasy.
 
Toronto Escorts