You can rent one for 3CUC per day from the Etecsa office on Obispo in Havana.Can I get a SIM card for Cuba local calls?
Sweet camera but it's $2500. for body alone. Another what? $600+ for a decent lens so well over $3000.Just get the Sony A7S (the S model)
The 7000 image seems the best - far more color and contrast picked up. Canons not bad, more muted not sure of its dynamic range. The phone meh dark and low contrast.Was curious to see there is any noticeable difference between the web images for 3 camera types. Day was overcast with some light drizzle, pictures cropped and sized only, no adjustments made.
In order, all pictures taken in Auto mode.
Taking the pictures with the DSLR Nikon D7000 with an ED gold lens in auto mode was a bit of a problem as the flash popped up. I looked at all the buttons on the camera trying to figure out how to turn the flash off, and finally just held the flash down and took the picture, checked the picture, and took a couple more.
Taking the picture with the Canon SX130 point and shoot camera was effortless and I felt comfortable the picture taken was good even though I hardly ever touch this camera.
Taking the picture with the Nexux 5 smart phone was effortless and the picture looked ok when checked.
Was curious to see there is any noticeable difference between the web images for 3 camera types. Day was overcast with some light drizzle, pictures cropped and sized only, no adjustments made.
![]()
![]()
![]()
In order, all pictures taken in Auto mode.
Taking the pictures with the DSLR Nikon D7000 with an ED gold lens in auto mode was a bit of a problem as the flash popped up. I looked at all the buttons on the camera trying to figure out how to turn the flash off, and finally just held the flash down and took the picture, checked the picture, and took a couple more.
Taking the picture with the Canon SX130 point and shoot camera was effortless and I felt comfortable the picture taken was good even though I hardly ever touch this camera.
Taking the picture with the Nexux 5 smart phone was effortless and the picture looked ok when checked.
The mega pixel count is sufficient in your camera. You really don't need more than 8mp if you are not printing large photos. There are two types of zoom, digital and optical. Digital just enlarges the photo, taking away the sharpness, optical zoom brings the subject closer. It is better to have a higher optical zoom number than going crazy over mega pixels.I'll mention again, I do have a small canon, 10 mega pixels with a 3.3 optical zoom, I have no idea what these numbers mean. I usually take a 3 month yearly vaca, this year I thought I might take a lot of pictures and see if a travel website is an option. Will this camera do as I want the pictures to be fairly high quality.
I post on a couple travel websites with pictures from my Sony DSC-RX100. I seriously love this camera, a lot because it's true that the best camera is the one you have on you. I put it in one pocket of my motorcyle jacket when I ride or clip it on my belt loop when I hike. So easy, solid results.I'll mention again, I do have a small canon, 10 mega pixels with a 3.3 optical zoom, I have no idea what these numbers mean. I usually take a 3 month yearly vaca, this year I thought I might take a lot of pictures and see if a travel website is an option. Will this camera do as I want the pictures to be fairly high quality.
If you have some money to spend you could get a higher end point and shoot camera that will still fit in your pocket. The newer cameras will be faster, better. Think the camera you have now is the bottom end for Canon. If you are going to buy a new camera, might want to have a lower focal length for taking pictures indoors and outdoor landscapes. The lower the number the wider the angle you can see through the lens. Your camera's focal length starts are 37, something closer to 20 would be better. http://www.dpreview.com/products/canon/compacts/canon_a800 Go to Henry's or Downtown camera and tell the guy what you are doing, and he will be able to help.I'll mention again, I do have a small canon, 10 mega pixels with a 3.3 optical zoom, I have no idea what these numbers mean. I usually take a 3 month yearly vaca, this year I thought I might take a lot of pictures and see if a travel website is an option. Will this camera do as I want the pictures to be fairly high quality.
I'll mention again, I do have a small canon, 10 mega pixels with a 3.3 optical zoom, I have no idea what these numbers mean. I usually take a 3 month yearly vaca, this year I thought I might take a lot of pictures and see if a travel website is an option. Will this camera do as I want the pictures to be fairly high quality.
You might want to consider a water and shock proof camera though you won't get a zoom lens and the picture quality can suffer a bit.I may try starting a travel type website with lots of pics so I want them to be of a good quality. I am leaning towards a phone as I can use it for many uses. I want to be able to carry it easily in a pocket, I usually wear shorts with fairly roomy side thigh pockets. If I get drunk it's not hanging around my neck but tucked in my pocket.
I may try starting a travel type website with lots of pics so I want them to be of a good quality. I am leaning towards a phone as I can use it for many uses. I want to be able to carry it easily in a pocket, I usually wear shorts with fairly roomy side thigh pockets. If I get drunk it's not hanging around my neck but tucked in my pocket.
How do you get billed? Will it work on a newer phones (standard SIM card)? The only reason I'd get one is to stay in touch with the local novia at a rate that's cheaper than what my Cdn provider will charge.You can rent one for 3CUC per day from the Etecsa office on Obispo in Havana.
1st photo - heavy vignette at the corners. Good saturation and color reproduction. Good dynamic range and sharpness.
2nd photo
Good dynamic range. Not sure about your settings but color reproduction could be better. It is not that sharp...although it is acceptable for point and shoot.
3rd photo
Contrasty, appears sharper then 2nd photo, dynamic range in not there, but appears to have more detail in clouds maybe becuase of constrast vs. 2nd photo. Appears overly saturated and colors do not look right.
In conclusion the point and shoot looks ok. Nexus looks too harsh. 1st photo is nice.






