More bullshit.I suggest you re-read my posting history and try to learn something, rather than looking for ways to score cheap political (not scientific) points. I didn't say the IPCC shouldn't advocate. I don't care what the IPCC does. What I said is that scientists shouldn't be engaged in political advocacy. True scientists must do everything they can to try to eliminate biases from their work. They most definitely shouldn't be focused exclusively on trying to find "evidence" to support a political position. They should be looking at all the evidence to learn the truth about how the natural world works. If the IPCC wanted to be taken seriously as a body that speaks for science, then it shouldn't be involved in political/activist advocacy.
The IPCC is only a handful of people who work entirely with peer assessed work that they have no hand in. All they do is compile the work of thousands of scientists from over a hundred countries. There is absolutely no way they could control either the research they are handed or twist it to report anything more then the peer assessed, evidenced based papers say.
Your conspiracy theories come from lobbyists whose only goal is to seed dissent so their funders don't lose a shitful of money should we do something about climate change. These theories are unfounded and totally ridiculous.
All legit science backs these findings.
All.
This is the findings of all evidence based research.
It has been shown to be spectacularly correct.