Okay, but then we have to drug-test all City councillors, not just Rob Ford.Yes...but he has not been charged with a crime. The constitution is irrelevant in this situation. In a court of law, this case would be thrown out immediately. However, in the realm of politics, it is the court of public opinion that one is dealing with. In this court, speculation, gossip, rumor, and innuendo are tools of the trade.
It may not be fair but that's just the way it is
Okay, but then we have to drug-test all City councillors, not just Rob Ford.
I mean, fair is fair right??!!!
And when I say drug-test them, I mean all hair.
Hair on top of the head, chest-hair, pubic hair....the works!!!! Nothing should be left off the table!!
If we're gonna test the mayor, we gotta test everyone!! If they got nothing to hide, they got nothing to worry aboot!!!! Right??!!!!
^^^^ LOL.........its too late, we already got your IP# and we're now testing your pubic hairs as we speak![]()
Dude...Stop freaking out! You're starting to scare me!
:wink:
Anyway...Freaking out changes nothing! YOU KNOW CONWAY IS RIGHT!!!
I'm sorry if you don't like the message, Phil. I really am. But Conway Stewart ONLY states facts. It's just how it is...accept the truth.
![]()
I thought you were all about small government?Okay, but then we have to drug-test all City councillors, not just Rob Ford.
I mean, fair is fair right??!!!
Drug testing everyone would just be too expensive, aren't you a small government kind of guy?So groggy, you wanna just drug-test Rob Ford then, but not all councillors??!
Hey, I'm fine with that!! But lets drug-test everyone on City council then, not just Rob Ford!If private companies can test staff for drugs randomly (ie - oil / mining companies), why would we not test those in public office??
Oh look...you failed to mention that he was paying full market rate for his suite in a mixed occupancy subsidized building! The smear campaign lives! And if Olivia knew about the parlour and approved, exactly what is the problem? Was a law broken? Was he smoking crack with gangsters??????Yes. But the police did find him in a massage parlour. Even Olivia acknowledged that. And he was living in a subsidised housing complex as well.
I haven't seen any competent evidence about the video.....competent evidence BEING the video.
If you think it would make it fair, then sure, test them all.Hey, I'm fine with that!! But lets drug-test everyone on City council then, not just Rob Ford!
Are you okay with that???!!
The deifference is credible proof of the occurances in Jack's case.Oh look...you failed to mention that he was paying full market rate for his suite in a mixed occupancy subsidized building! The smear campaign lives! And if Olivia knew about the parlour and approved, exactly what is the problem? Was a law broken? Was he smoking crack with gangsters?
LOL.....you would be left no government at allI think all government employees should be subject to random drug tests, seeing we are paying their salaries
What exactly has "all the stuff" Rob done to waver any support??!I don't really care if he's done crack. I'm just amazed that with all the stuff he's done prior to this that he could have any support
hopefully the police are investigating to find out what Ford did to the guy who had the videoThe deifference is credible proof of the occurances in Jack's case.
Nowwhere is that video again?
You can do that in the US but not in Canada.If private companies can test staff for drugs randomly (ie - oil / mining companies), why would we not test those in public office??
Of course you have proof of this accusation, proof that eliminates all reasonable doubt that maybe one or two folks read the Star skeptically..Hey, I totally agree with you.
All news is either slanted to the Left or to the Right. There is no in-between. Its just too bad Toronto Star readers dont realize this, they think the TorStar is completely neutral






