How do you know they were telling the truth? Theoretically if it did happen to one of them, what would they gain by telling you the truth? I think they would deny it regardless to protect their business....Ok well then I guess when I spoke with them they were lying. The facts as I know them is that none of the established agencies are involved. Meanwhile let's just wait for the OP to clearthings up with some more details from his buddy.
You've got a point, he could mean hotel staff. Though I think that's unlikely. I suppose we are waiting for more details.Was he confronted by police? Or was it the hotel that busted up the situation, and did not allow him in as a guest?
as CK stated many of the "newer" agencies are just reincarnations of older ones that have reps for not being discreet, there for more likely to have issues with getting kicked out or having the cops called.It's also irresponsible to throw newer agencies under the bus when you don't even know if this really happened.
Why do you even need to put anyone to blame? Just to clear your own name?as CK stated many of the "newer" agencies are just reincarnations of older ones that have reps for not being discreet, there for more likely to have issues with getting kicked out or having the cops called.
Not throwing anyone under the bus Joey, but it wasn't us, and it wasnt EH so by process of elimination it is likely one of the newer ones. Again, it probably isn't a "bust" is is most likely a disturbance call.
Hopefully the OP will give us the info.
Agreed 100%. Could very well be an "established agency"It could also very well be one of the established agencies, where the cops bust the girl. She agrees to help the cops and continues working... Random client busted for being there so he will testify in court in exchange for dropped charges. Same arrangement for the girl, dropped charges for cooperation. All this happens without the agency knowing until the investigation is over and sufficient evidence gathered.
Cops now have testimony of an employee, a client, and details through the employee of business practices. Given there is more than three people involved. Along with the main purpose being to commit an offence, it constitutes as a criminal org.
Don't kid yourselves, there is always a possibility. Regardless of whatever comforts you feel are provided by the current rulings. This is a risky business for everyone involved until the laws change. Which I hope they do sooner than later.
Wow, half of those comments came from a new member joined few weeks ago.Wow, a couple of sentences by mpgvd and its met with 2 pages of comments! I didn't know the Ottawa forum was that busy!
Come on guy, spill the beans!
Customer could not get charged in such a scenario. That would be considered entrapment.It could also very well be one of the established agencies, where the cops bust the girl. She agrees to help the cops and continues working... Random client busted for being there so he will testify in court in exchange for dropped charges. Same arrangement for the girl, dropped charges for cooperation. All this happens without the agency knowing until the investigation is over and sufficient evidence gathered.
Cops now have testimony of an employee, a client, and details through the employee of business practices. Given there is more than three people involved. Along with the main purpose being to commit an offence, it constitutes as a criminal org.
Don't kid yourselves, there is always a possibility. Regardless of whatever comforts you feel are provided by the current rulings. This is a risky business for everyone involved until the laws change. Which I hope they do sooner than later.