The one small silver lining in this is that piece of shit Nancy Grace cannot spend the next couple of years making money off of the appeals.She's almost as bad as that baby killer
The facts very clearly, IMO, show that she murdered her daughter. Her actions and LIES (and the jury WAS satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that she lied, and lied, and lied..) were completely inconsistent with an accidental death.Now, how do you know that? Were you there? Did she tell you so? Did you gaze into a crystal ball?
Don't you get it? Guilt, innocence, etc. are questions of both fact and law, not a question of "Well, I think so!"
Perry
Not to pick on your post solely, but to reinstate the definition of reasonable doubt, you can't say IMO. IMO="I think so"The facts very clearly, IMO, show that she murdered her daughter. Her actions and LIES (and the jury WAS satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that she lied, and lied, and lied..) were completely inconsistent with an accidental death.
Thanks for sharing. Remind me not to introduce you to any women I might know. Or any women in my neighborhood. Or in my city. Or in my....well you get the idea.I want to tap her 25 year old murdering ass. I'd pay a premium to do so.
I'd ream the shit out of her and choke her while saying "You fucking little sick slutty daughter killer" between my gritted teeth.
Good hard sex.
uhhh....what's the diffrence between OJ and Casey?....OJ's blackMeaning what? If they let a black man walk, they must be able to let a ....
Oh, never mind OJ, how's Robert Blake doing these days?
No. She is protected under the double-jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment. Once acquitted, she can't be charged again for the same crime.I'm not familiar with the US Justice system, but is it possible that the decision could be appealed by the State?
Basically, every time she opened her mouth.Does anyone know what lies she told the peace officer's ?
Many people have "lynch mob" mentality. Which is sad.12 presumably honest and fair people have heard all the evidence, and they are not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that she did it. Some on this board are convinced based on little bits and pieces they have heard on the news and on TV shows. I think that is very very arrogant and stupid.
Maybe she assumes the average American jurist thinks like her.Anybody notice a common thread through this trial,the OJ murder trial,and the Michael Jackson molestation trial?
Nancy Grace,shooting her mouth off for weeks/months on end,during each trial,and assuring the viewers that a guilty conviction was so obviously proven,that the jury would have no choice but to send the defendant to the slammer!
She's now 0-3!
Maybe she'll finally learn to keep her mouth shut!
What was her motive to lie? I find that quite suspicious. Is she protecting someone else who killed her infant? Is she partially to blame but didn't do it (iow, she allowed it)?Basically, every time she opened her mouth.
Casey Anthony has been described as the kind of person that will lie to you about the time of day, even if you're wearing a watch.
I followed this trial (blame my morbid curiosity) and Casey is a compulsive and astonishingly skilled liar. She made up the most elaborate stories with details and made up characters when it suited her. They seemed plausible but when they were proven wrong, she'd just switch gears and make up another plausible story.
How she can create so much detail on the fly and keep the stories straight is an impressive talent.
She may have gotten away with murder but this isn’t over. Like OJ, in the end, she’ll get what she deserves.
One such made up character, Zanny the nanny, turns out to be a real person, Zania Gonzales and she’ll be suing Casey for defamation of character. Stay tuned.
She can't be charged by the state. However if they can find the law, the Federal government can still charge her.No. She is protected under the double-jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment. Once acquitted, she can't be charged again for the same crime.
An appeal of a jury's finding of not guilty is not the equivalent of being re-charged. The double-jeopardy provisions of the US Constitution do not come into play in an appeal - it is not double jeopardy because it is merely a continuation of the original proceeding. In truth, the DA's office could appeal the verdict if they want to. However in order to appeal successfully they would have to show the Appeals court an error in law (e.g., the judge's instructions to the jury were flawed, a piece of evidence was admitted that should not have been, a piece of evidence was excluded that should have been admitted).No. She is protected under the double-jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment. Once acquitted, she can't be charged again for the same crime.
I belive the since the civil court was not subject to the same standards as the criminal court you should not say they found that he caused the death. The find was that they thought he could have caused the death and since they thought no one else had reason to kill them - they decided he was mostly to have done it.LOL. Perhaps not a lie sufficient to support the charge and conviction of lying to a peace officer. You will recall that OJ was acquitted and then a subsequent civil jury found that he had caused the death of Denise Brown and Ron Goldman. But you are right and I was being facetious.