CupidS Escorts

1,000 architects want to know how WTC buildings could possibly collapse on 9/11

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,490
11
38
Good for them for asking. But a question is proof of nothing but the questioner's uncertainty. Not worth any bandwidth until there are actual facts not already known to post.

That there are questioners is not news.
 

tboy

resident smartass
Aug 18, 2001
15,972
2
0
63
way out in left field
Here we go again....
LOL I hear ya. When the architect who designed the things, and the engineers who stamped the drawings say "this is why they went down" you can pretty much bet that that's why they went down.
 

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,741
6,012
113
Niagara
Because thousands of gallons of burning jet fuel couldn't possibly melt steal..... and fuck... the 2 biggest buildings in the world collapsing would in no way cause any meaningful structural damage to the 40 story building next to it...


Perhaps these 1000 architects are more qualified to collect tolls on the NJ Turnpike....


cheers!
 

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,964
6,107
113

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,499
4,904
113

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,043
6,053
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Perhaps these 1000 architects are more qualified to collect tolls on the NJ Turnpike....
The overwhelming majority of New Jersey state employees are courteous, hard-working individuals eager to aid the public for whom they work. And then there is the small number of toll collectors employed by the New Jersey Turnpike Authority who regularly go rogue on motorists.
Going Rogue is a Republican thingy down here in the States.
Ditzy Sarah Palin just wrote a book on it.
Perhaps they were teabagging Republicans.
Most of them are a bit 'touched in the head'....
 

lenharper

Active member
Jan 15, 2004
1,106
0
36
Hey Stinky, perhaps there was some kind of conspiracy involved, has anyone considered that?
 

5hummer

Active member
Sep 6, 2008
3,788
5
38
Hey, there is some validity to this. Think about it.
The amount of time, resource and dedication to be an Architect is comparable to being in the medical field.

These are professionals that have real world extensive experience in producing "complicated" buildings that we live, play and work in.

If an architect questions the integrity of your home -- wouldn't you listen?
 

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,741
6,012
113
Niagara
Absolutely ridiculous! You have a list of Conspiracy theorists, congrats!

Have you ever seen controlled demolition? It is sync'ed from the bottom up, not the top down. How did the window's blow out, the same way a paper bag explodes when you crush it after its been filled with air.

You might as well post something on Pearl Harbor, The Great depression, Roswell, and The Kennedy Assassination while you are at it, to name a few!


Everyone knows Pearl Harbor never happened... It was a clever way to draw attention to a group of small Islands, draw tourists for economic prosperity, and make a future president. Yes, it was a historic day when we (and by we, I mean you's) elected the first Hawaiian to the White House....... (Poker pauses a moment for dramatic effect.... and sighs)

Yes my friends.... It was a necessary evil when we (and again, by we, I mean you's) falsely, and calculatedly accused Japan of attacking Pearl Harbor. If only Al Gore had already invented the internet, the Jap's could have gotten there message out, that they did not attack the US fleet at all.... It was the CIA and Bin Laden (as they were still friends at that point in history). But sadly, before they could get there story out, we dropped and A-Bomb or 2 on them, to shut them up.....

It's true.... i saw a documentary my friend made on this in his basement.

cheers!
 

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,741
6,012
113
Niagara
Ya... Everyone knows he dragged his ass and didn't get around to that until 1988!
Does that make Al Gore a terrorist.... because you can disable the whole country, and blow things up with an internet....


Cheers!
 

fuji

Banned
Jan 31, 2005
80,011
7
0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
is.gd
I read some of the "personal statements" and they revealed a great deal of ignorance. A common theme was that only in a controlled demolition does a building collapse symmetrically. That is true for low rise buildings, houses, and most office towers. Presumably that is the area of expertise (if any) of these people. In such buildings there are more than one support, and so if one support fails the building tends to topple in the direction of the failed support.

The WTC however had no such structure. The floors were hung from a superstructure, not supported from underneath by columns. As a result when they began falling from the structure they fell straight down.

Presumably only architects and engineers with experience working on super skyscrapers like the WTC would have expertise about that sort of thing and so what you have on that petition is a parade of ignorance.
 

bammab007

Banned
Jan 23, 2010
374
0
0

oldjones

CanBarelyRe Member
Aug 18, 2001
24,490
11
38
Hey, there is some validity to this. Think about it.
The amount of time, resource and dedication to be an Architect is comparable to being in the medical field.

These are professionals that have real world extensive experience in producing "complicated" buildings that we live, play and work in.

If an architect questions the integrity of your home -- wouldn't you listen?
And four outta five doctors smoked Chesterfields™.

I've spent thirty years gettindg stuff built and I too can sign a petition I've barely read—if that—without doing any research or investigation of the topic.

All stinky's list proves is that there is a list. This particular list is names of folks who want more info. Proves nothing about anything.

When there's more info, then there might be something to talk about. Buit talking about the list is like talking about the phone book.
 

Yoga Face

New member
Jun 30, 2009
6,328
19
0
Occam's razor

is the principle that the simplest explanation or strategy tends to be the best one.

To quote Isaac Newton, "We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. Therefore, to the same natural effects we must, so far as possible, assign the same causes."

In science, Occam’s razor is used as to guide scientists in the development of theoretical models

In my own words, the least far fetched idea, and the one closest to the known, should be accepted until evidence persuades otherwise


Now which is least far fetched ???

1 There is a conspiracy to cover up that the government destroyed the Towers
2 there is a conspiracy to make it look like the government is conspiring to cover up




1 The government is covering up little green men

2 There is a conspiracy to make it look like the government is covering up LGM
 
Last edited:
Toronto Escorts