SP's ads and photoshop

[GotGusto]

I like amateur porn, pics and videos. I like real women and I like the small imperfections in the skin. It gets me off. I like it when I find an attractive escort who has had pics taken that may have had some work on them but not professionally done. With pro photoshopped pics, you never have any idea what the girl is actually going to look like when she shows up.

I realize that it will never change. Most guys want to see pics like that just like they want the girl with the big fake tits. What turns most guys on is a complete turnoff for me.

 

[The Options Menu]

I'm fine with shopping identifying marks and temporary blemishes away, of adjusting focus and lighting, but I have a strong personal preference for 'raw images'. Oddly enough I like my porn to mirror my sex to a great degree. Just like I like dancers that (vaguely) mirror women I like / date in terms of age and aesthetics and personality.

The real problem is, IMHO, when digital modifications to an image stray into the realm of 'cosmetic surgery'. That's fine if you like those images, and you're never going to see the person in the flesh... But if you actually see the person in the flesh I could see that being bitterly disappointing. (Not unlike a badly dated photo.)

Over shopping an image and / or using older photos is just a kinder gentler version of B&S.

 

[Mia.Colpa]

Be aware of Santillo pics of ladies in this business. This guy is a master illusionist, he can make Phyllis Diller look like Raquel Welch in her prime. I hate to say it but I'm telling you my true opinion, I will not book any lady that has Santillo pics, it's been such a disappointment in general that I won't take the chance anymore.

On the other hand, I would hire Santillo to take portraits outside this business, he can really make me look like Robert Redford, and that's not easy when you look like Danny Devito. lol I also like the way he creatively uses his photoshop to make my manhood look 14" long.

 

[Hiding]

This goes the other way too. I hear this all the time and I bet Hannah/Jemma do as well.

Santillo takes beautiful fantasy photos.

 

[Molly Robinson]

Other then blemishes I try not to photoshop my pics, the last thing I want is someone showing up at my door and expecting something different. I do how ever tend to show off my best features, such as my smile....

 

[SecretRendezvous]

I find the photoshop removal of tattoos to be the most deceptive use of all.

Why? If it is posted in the ladies ads/website that the tattoos have been removed, why is it deceptive?

These ladies do have a right to protect their personal identy, do they not? Are you looking for ladies with certain tattoos? If she has a hello kitty tat, that is not okay, but if it is of a butterfly, then that is okay?

Most guys want to see tits and ass and the pics, even with tattoos removed show that.....

 

[Rockslinger]

I avoid all this photoshopped stuff by going to SC's and meeting the ladies in the flesh (plus they also talk as well). Impossible to "photoshop" a person in the flesh.

 

[wangbang]

Why? If it is posted in the ladies ads/website that the tattoos have been removed, why is it deceptive?

I am mixed on this myself. I understand hiding an identity however I have been shocked more than once by large tattoos that I wasn't expecting. Can't really say that too many indies have made a note that tattoos have been removed from their pics.

In the rare times that I have seen the comment that they have been removed I have simply assumed they are large and look elsewhere.

 

[nolabel]

No. Those more leftish than me are those with no grasp on material reality.

Depends on what species of leftist you are. If you get your jollies throwing around talk of respecting identities, that's pseudo-leftist. If economics are your thing, well that's something to talk about.

 

[SecretRendezvous]

I am mixed on this myself. I understand hiding an identity however I have been shocked more than once by large tattoos that I wasn't expecting. Can't really say that too many indies have made a note that tattoos have been removed from their pics.

In the rare times that I have seen the comment that they have been removed I have simply assumed they are large and look elsewhere.

and see I assume everyone states if tattoo's have been removed. I know I do for all our ladies on our site.

However for our ladies, they are not big tattoos either. Small ones onthe back, or hip, or lower calf on the leg type tattoo.

 

[blackrock13]

I avoid all this photoshopped stuff by going to SC's and meeting the ladies in the flesh (plus they also talk as well). Impossible to "photoshop" a person in the flesh.

I hear that some of those dancers are quite a shock in daylight though.

 

[Rockslinger]

I hear that some of those dancers are quite a shock in daylight though.

Yup, I hear you. SC's are so dark and the VIP's at CB are pitch black. I have seen some of these ladies in the outdoor smoking pads in broad daylight and some are a bit of a shock but most look fine.

 

[lenharper]

Other then blemishes I try not to photoshop my pics, the last thing I want is someone showing up at my door and expecting something different. I do how ever tend to show off my best features, such as my smile....

I dunno, I think your filthy flirty mind is your best feature...

 

[nolabel]

I have been shocked more than once by large tattoos that I wasn't expecting . . . In the rare times that I have seen the comment that they have been removed I have simply assumed they are large and look elsewhere.

Tatooism: prejudice against tatoo's

 

[wangbang]

Tatooism: prejudice against tatoo's

Hehe, I've got it bad too. Last night at an SC a dancer in her late 20's was pointing out to me that every new 19 year old in the club looks the same these days. Lots of tats all in the same places. So much for individualism.

 

[Rockslinger]

Last night at an SC a dancer in her late 20's was pointing out to me that every new 19 year old in the club looks the same these days. Lots of tats all in the same places.

Sad to say, some of those dancers have tatoos of the name of their "owner" (you know what I mean).

 

[genintoronto]

Depends on what species of leftist you are. If you get your jollies throwing around talk of respecting identities, that's pseudo-leftist. If economics are your thing, well that's something to talk about.

Dude, you're out of touch.

Identity talk is SO last year. We're talking about the affect and the body these days.

 

[genintoronto]

The real problem is, IMHO, when digital modifications to an image stray into the realm of 'cosmetic surgery'. That's fine if you like those images, and you're never going to see the person in the flesh... But if you actually see the person in the flesh I could see that being bitterly disappointing. (Not unlike a badly dated photo.)

That's my take on it as well.

The other thing to keep in mind when looking at escort pics (mostly the professional ones, but it stands as well for the amateur type) is that you are looking at a fixed representation of a breathing and moving person. In a similar way that a pic from a porn actress will usually make her look more perfect than she will ever look in a video or in person, the same holds true for escorts pics. And most of it has nothing to do with photoshopping, but rather with the pose, the lightning, and the fixed-ness of the image.

 

[nolabel]

Dude, you're out of touch.

Identity talk is SO last year. We're talking about the affect and the body these days.

Oh, I see. When I hear folks prattling on using the word 'affect' I cringe for the fate of leftist thought. I prefer not to be in touch with fads going nowhere; or, will have no effect.

Todays rant: check.

 

[Rockslinger]

a pic from a porn actress will usually make her look more perfect than she will ever look in a video or in person, the same holds true for escorts pics.

What are you saying woman? Are you saying you don't look as gorgeous in real life as your "size D" escort pics? Does that mean I shouldn't feel bad about losing the birthday freebie contest?