Select Company Escorts

Bush's 'noble war' in Iraq: Distinguished Iraqi scholar

FOOTSNIFFER

New member
Jan 23, 2004
1,505
1
0
Maybe Bush was right all along....

Ajami is an astonishing rarity
Kevin Libin, National Post
Published: Monday, May 26, 2008

CALGARY -There are countless stories in Iraq that Fouad Ajami considers "heartbreaking." They are the product of the dozen years that preceded this war. It was then, not now, he reminds us, when people suffered most cruelly.

"Ask Iraqis what were their darkest years -- read Iraqi fiction, Iraqi memoirs -- [it was] the '90s, under the sanctions, after we left Saddam in place in 1991." He has no tolerance for those "great realists" who argue that more years of miserable sanctions was preferable to invasion: Bill Clinton, Madeleine Albright ... Barack Obama. "Liberal Americans opted for a sanctions regime which was nearly criminal in its cruelty toward Iraq," says Mr. Ajami. "The Iraqi middle class was destroyed and shattered during the sanctions regime. That's when people sold their books, that's when people sold their belongings, that's when women turned to prostitution, that's when the [Hussein] regime had the run of the country." From Saddam Hussein's era, "Iraq may have something like, for all we know, well over two million widows. There are several million orphans." Once the dust settles on this war, Mr. Ajami predicts, we will regain clarity on the genuine "monumental tragedy" that was Iraq, before. And why, he insists, "history will be kind" to this "noble war." Unlike those before him who preferred the convenience of their suffering, George W. Bush, he says, "gave the Iraqis a chance."

To read the full article and a full text of Mr. Ajami's address in Calgary, click on following links....

http://www.nationalpost.com/todays_paper/story.html?id=540095

Fouad Ajami's excellent address before the teatro club of Calgary, on why he feels that Bush and America's sacrifices to bring freedom to Arab lands will take root.....

http://www.nationalpost.com/todays_paper/story.html?id=540096
 

TQM

Guest
Feb 1, 2006
2,651
0
0
Sanctions

were certainly an option, but in Iraq Hussein used them to weaken the middle class and strengthen his own position.

The hope was that it would cause revolt. But those who wanted to revolt were in no position. Those who attempted revolt - or even dissent - were tortured and murdered.

Amazing that there are some here who wish that Hussein was around still to torture and murder.
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,090
6,181
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
FOOTSNIFFER said:
"history will be kind" to this "noble war." Unlike those before him who preferred the convenience of their suffering, George W. Bush, he says, "gave the Iraqis a chance."
Interesting revision of history.
Did K Rove 'ghost write' it?
It's almost Rovian in its attempts to 'blame it ALL ON CLINTON' while not daring to mention George H W Bush, you know Dad of Dubya who set all those years of suffering up in the first place when he decided to let Saddam, his one time ALLY, stay in power after OIL WAR I...:rolleyes:
 

*d*

Active member
Aug 17, 2001
1,621
12
38
FOOTSNIFFER said:
Maybe Bush was right all along....

Ajami is an astonishing rarity
Kevin Libin, National Post
Published: Monday, May 26, 2008

CALGARY -There are countless stories in Iraq that Fouad Ajami considers "heartbreaking." They are the product of the dozen years that preceded this war. It was then, not now, he reminds us, when people suffered most cruelly.

"Ask Iraqis what were their darkest years -- read Iraqi fiction, Iraqi memoirs -- [it was] the '90s, under the sanctions, after we left Saddam in place in 1991." He has no tolerance for those "great realists" who argue that more years of miserable sanctions was preferable to invasion: Bill Clinton, Madeleine Albright ... Barack Obama. "Liberal Americans opted for a sanctions regime which was nearly criminal in its cruelty toward Iraq," says Mr. Ajami. "The Iraqi middle class was destroyed and shattered during the sanctions regime. That's when people sold their books, that's when people sold their belongings, that's when women turned to prostitution, that's when the [Hussein] regime had the run of the country." From Saddam Hussein's era, "Iraq may have something like, for all we know, well over two million widows. There are several million orphans." Once the dust settles on this war, Mr. Ajami predicts, we will regain clarity on the genuine "monumental tragedy" that was Iraq, before. And why, he insists, "history will be kind" to this "noble war." Unlike those before him who preferred the convenience of their suffering, George W. Bush, he says, "gave the Iraqis a chance."

To read the full article and a full text of Mr. Ajami's address in Calgary, click on following links....

http://www.nationalpost.com/todays_paper/story.html?id=540095

Fouad Ajami's excellent address before the teatro club of Calgary, on why he feels that Bush and America's sacrifices to bring freedom to Arab lands will take root.....

http://www.nationalpost.com/todays_paper/story.html?id=540096
And what did Dick Cheney say back in 2002: "As for the reaction of the Arab 'street,' the Middle East expert Professor Fouad Ajami predicts that after liberation, the streets in Basra and Baghdad are 'sure to erupt in joy in the same way the throngs in Kabul greeted the Americans."

Yes that Fouad Ajami(advisor to Condi Rice and a SAIS colleague of Paul Wolfowitz) is really on the ball and free of political bias.:rolleyes:
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,090
6,181
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Maybe next they will be quoting their credible Ahmed Chalabi, one time oil minister in Iraq...:rolleyes:
 

maxweber

Active member
Oct 12, 2005
1,296
1
36
Citing this kind of bought-and-paid-for sleazebag as an expert on Iraq is like seeking marital advice from a Times Square hooker.

MW
 

Rockslinger

Banned
Apr 24, 2005
32,766
0
0
WoodPeckr said:
not daring to mention George H W Bush, you know Dad of Dubya who set all those years of suffering up in the first place when he decided to let Saddam, his one time ALLY, stay in power after OIL WAR I
Once again, it is white, Christian, English speaking nations (USA, U.K., Australia) that are to blame for the Iraqi mess. First, when they left Saddam in power in 1991 and then for removing Saddam from power in 2003.
 

TQM

Guest
Feb 1, 2006
2,651
0
0
so OW,

if someone now supports your position, it's interesting, but if someone doesn't, it's not?
 

WoodPeckr

Protuberant Member
May 29, 2002
47,090
6,181
113
North America
thewoodpecker.net
Other Wanderer said:
What I found more interesting was what Bush's ex-press secretary, Scott McClellan, has been saying ...
For sure!
Now we are getting info from a real insider who has seen the light.
It will be interesting to see how the loyal bushie apologists react to Scott ...;)
 

TQM

Guest
Feb 1, 2006
2,651
0
0
well ow,

To me, McLellan's position isn't interesting at all - but McLellan, the person, is what interests me.

He doesn't claim to have objected ever to the things he now complains about, and there is a certain lack of precision to his charges (at least those I've seen).

Bush supporters will explain this as a lone disgruntled book seller.

You seem to think that it somehow just took him literally years to "see the light" so to speak.

The truth is probably somewhere in between.
 
Toronto Escorts