Tuesday Toronto Sun pg 4-Polic Cr4ack down

Ummmmmmmm

Link?????

durexguy said:

No link....read the last line... in the paper....not sure "on-line" status...

Coffee.....paper....way to start the day

Click to expand...

I live in Buffalo...........How do you propose I do this???

papasmerf said:

Ummmmmmmm

Link?????

Click to expand...

Try this:

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Crime/2008/02/26/4877198-sun.html

papasmerf said:

I live in Buffalo...........How do you propose I do this???

Click to expand...

That explains it.

papasmerf said:

I live in Buffalo...........How do you propose I do this???

Click to expand...

The article is on line, but it does mention the real name of the woman deported to Russia, so I don't know if a link is okay on Terb.

Don't you love how the lying idiot cop duped the writer into attempting to describe the entire business as pimps manipulating teenage girls, but the only two examples of the "crackdown" involve women running their own incall, one of them 38 years old and the other's age not listed?

HaywoodJabloemy said:

The article is on line, but it does mention the real name of the woman deported to Russia, so I don't know if a link is okay on Terb.

Click to expand...

It's public record.

HaywoodJabloemy said:

Don't you love how the lying idiot cop duped the writer into attempting to describe the entire business as pimps manipulating teenage girls, but the only two examples of the "crackdown" involve women running their own incall, one of them 38 years old and the other's age not listed?

Click to expand...

The article is indeed deceptive but look at the charges and some of the descriptions and what is really going on emerges. It really has nothing at all to do with "Cops crack down on e-hookers" at least as the The Toronto Sun wants to give the impression it does.

The foreign national who is to be deported "pleaded guilty February 14 to keeping a common bawdy house and possession of proceeds of crime. . .[and] There were calls from tenants about the amount of men going up to her apartment." Ok, it was incall not outcall and hopefully everyone here knows the difference between the two in law.

Then the article cites the example of a women who "last week [was] evicted from her downtown apartment, after tenants complained about the amount of men going to her unit." Once again incall and in both cases, the police apparently had prior complaints from the neighbors.

Then as HaywoodJabloemy wrote, the article tries to somehow link this to the sexual exploitation of minors and finishes up by quoting a police officer from Dallas, Texas which must mark some new insight from The Toronto Star, since I was previously unaware that Canadian Law and the law in Texas were the same on these points.*

What's the object leason here for all of us - "keep on the deep-water side of the buoy." There are a good many threads here on TERB about the law and there are websites as well.



* outcall and incall I'm not refering to illegal and inmoral activity with minors

here is the link from Toronto Sun

http://www.torontosun.com/News/TorontoAndGTA/2008/02/26/4876924-sun.html

My favourite line:

"Our officers are going through the Internet and newspapers on a daily basis searching for illegal activity."

Yeah right. Just not all for the same reason though.

Hopefully examples like this one will strike a chord with you guys as to why ladies ask a lot of questions of you when you're calling for an appointment. Ladies have to protect themselves so the ladies, especially the experienced independents, ask pertinent questions so they can be satisfied they're safe.

So please, don't give these ladies a hard time, they are only asking so they can continue to offer good times for us guys. Be more empathetic, they take all the risk, not us.