Allegra Escorts Collective

Young hot women 18-22, or MILFS 35+?

VinnyBuff

New member
Aug 30, 2006
285
0
0
What's your preference? Young hot University/College women, aged 18-22, or hot MILFS who are 35 and up?

For me it would have to be the young women...they don't have wrinkles, they're tighter, their skin is softer and smoother, they have less sun damage for the most part, their hair is silkier, and they're just hotter! :)
 

S.C. Joe

Client # 13
Nov 2, 2007
7,138
2
0
Detroit, USA
And the young chicks are happy, upbeat-full of life.

I would not turn down a 35 year old in good shape but I just can not see paying the same $$ when I could have had a Y-18 :D
 

raydeon

I hate Pantyhoses
Aug 5, 2003
448
0
0
Ontario
You guys are too concerned with external looks, which in most cases are artificial.

You seem to miss the real value of the person inside that envelope. My best memories are not from barbie dolls type, but from more mature ladies who deliver a much more satisfying encounter.

If I may quote the old cliché, beauty is only skin deep.
 

VinnyBuff

New member
Aug 30, 2006
285
0
0
It's in men's genes to want younger youthful females. It goes against evolution for a guy to prefer an older woman, since younger females are more fertile. Most men would therefore prefer to mate with a young female 18-22 over a woman who is over 35.
 

Sir Alex

Banned
Jun 5, 2007
372
1
0
Both age brackets are good, but you must always have a mutual chemistry then only both can enjoy and make most of it.
Young or 35 yrs does not make any difference, the lady should be good, kind, loving, & should love what she does, and should not be a scam artist
 

smuddan

Well-known member
Mar 7, 2007
2,393
387
83
For this hobby I would definitely prefer younger sps.

I would think that the majority of terbites who have been married for a little while, would probably prefer someone who is younger than their other halves.

To me, "LOOKS' is always a deciding factor and I prefer the younger, slimmer and tighter body types.

If I were to look for a true girlfriend/mistress, or a soul-mate whom I could relate or talk to than just having sex, then I would probably want someone more mature, someone whom I can commuicate with on the same intellectual level.

But if I were seeing her just for 30-60 minutes to have a quick release, why would I care how smart or how educated she is ?
 

Garrett

Hail to the king, baby.
Dec 18, 2001
2,103
28
48
35+

Hands down 35+... 18-22 just does not do it for me.

I am watching Anne Mroczkowski on Citytv right now... I do not know how an 18 yr old could touch her looks :)
 

S.C. Joe

Client # 13
Nov 2, 2007
7,138
2
0
Detroit, USA
KWI said:
I think each guy likes his own and will have pros and cons for both. I just think that some of the ideas for an older lady or younger lady are a bit skewed. Not all mature women give a more in-depth encounter and not all 20 somethings are wrinkle free and tight.

It really all boils down to the individual person.

How true--I have seen 16-17 year old girls who are so fat or ugly its mind blowing-not many but they are out there.

The older ladies can look good but most of the time-and this goes for some young chicks as well-its thanks to plastic surgery. That stuff is not cheap but it can make all the difference sometimes.

PS...in Vegas its almost a given that any escort you would get to see, had some work done.
 

eenthusiast

New member
Dec 11, 2007
38
0
0
S.C. Joe said:
And the young chicks are happy, upbeat-full of life.

I would not turn down a 35 year old in good shape but I just can not see paying the same $$ when I could have had a Y-18 :D
Me too, outward hotness is awesome, but I'd rather someone who wants to provide great service and looks merely 'good'.

I've only had one escort who really enjoyed her work I think (ironically she has an NRP).
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,710
3
0
What do you write of: Escorts or suitable marriage partners? It also depends on whether one is 35+ oneself.
 

Bear669

New member
Apr 9, 2006
2,301
3
0
Wilds of the GTA
Cant believe you are for real...

VinnyBuff said:
What's your preference? Young hot University/College women, aged 18-22, or hot MILFS who are 35 and up?

For me it would have to be the young women...they don't have wrinkles, they're tighter, their skin is softer and smoother, they have less sun damage for the most part, their hair is silkier, and they're just hotter!
.. excellent points made by others, but to reiterate:

"wrinkles, soft, smooth"- great complexion can bless women of all ages. Certainly the best skin I have touched has been the "older" SPs. And my 55 year old fuck buddy when I was in my 20s!
"Sun Damage" is caused by the farkin' SUN! Nothing to do with age!
"Silkier"- Its about proper care, and the SUN!
"Hotter"- meaning what? "hot" meaning horny, lusty, orgasmic? Young doesnt have a chance.

There are hordes of unfortunate (dumb) young kids with sun burn, wrinkles, coarse skin, acne and frazzled hair. I'd do Sophia Loren or Tina Turner any day over scrawny, drug frazzled Lindsay Lohan.
 

S.C. Joe

Client # 13
Nov 2, 2007
7,138
2
0
Detroit, USA
Best reason I hear from guys saying they like a date closer to their own age is a 20 something looks too much like their own daughter or her friends. That they just do not feel right to be with them and out in public-walking her to her ride, going out to eat, everybody stares at them.

I am told I "look" around 35 maybe less, so I get away-I think-with it and don't have any kids.
 

S.C. Joe

Client # 13
Nov 2, 2007
7,138
2
0
Detroit, USA
superman said:
i cant decide, both are perect

I hear mother and daughter duos are the "best" :p but I never found a pair.
 

buttercup

Active member
Feb 28, 2005
2,564
11
38
VinnyBuff said:
It's in men's genes to want younger youthful females. It goes against evolution for a guy to prefer an older woman, since younger females are more fertile. Most men would therefore prefer to mate with a young female 18-22 over a woman who is over 35.
Can't go along with your reasoning, VB.

In all other species, the males have evolved to screw any female (in heat), irrespective of age. Only in humans do males prefer young, just-become-fertile, females. Why the difference?

Human males have evolved to prefer smooth skin and firm breasts and large hip to waist ratio, in females. (You may have noticed this). Why those things? - It's not because they are the markers of being fertile -- it's because they are the hard-to-fake markers of being young.

The evolutionary reasoning goes like this.

In humans, two parents together have a much better chance of raising children to maturity than the mother on her own, mainly because of the enormous time it takes to raise a human, compared with other species. So, the men whose genes make them want to make long-term relationships with women leave the most offspring.

But if your genes make you prefer older women, your long-term relationships won't be so long! So you won't leave so many offsring.

So, it's because the raising-offspring time, in humans, is so long, and so demanding of two committed long-term parents, compared with other species, that human males have evolved to prefer "high-quality" young women.

It's because men are primarily interested in making long term relationships that our hearts beat faster when we perceive the aforesaid markers of female youth.
 

Bear669

New member
Apr 9, 2006
2,301
3
0
Wilds of the GTA
Lol!!

S.C. Joe said:
Best reason I hear from guys saying they like a date closer to their own age is a 20 something looks too much like their own daughter or her friends. That they just do not feel right to be with them and out in public-walking her to her ride, going out to eat, everybody stares at them.

I am told I "look" around 35 maybe less, so I get away-I think-with it and don't have any kids.
Hell, I am their Daddy Bear, and love being out with the mature or youngest gals (well, they are ALL young enough to be my daughters).

Sometimes the gals have concern, if they get spotted by family/friends its harder to explain the old guy.:rolleyes:
 
Toronto Escorts