CupidS Escorts
Toronto Escorts

YouTube Bans White Supremacists Stefan Molyneux, Richard Spencer, David Duke

canada-man

Well-known member
Jun 16, 2007
31,161
2,605
113
Toronto, Ontario
canadianmale.wordpress.com


Five years ago, a Mississauga therapist named Christina Papadopoulos took part in an online podcast with her husband and described how one day she cut off contact with her parents, whose company she found phony and stifling.


Ms. Papadopoulos also said she was worried her online musings about shunning her relatives might land her in trouble with "the psychology community."


Her fears came true this week when, in an unprecedented disciplinary case, the College of Psychologists of Ontario found her guilty of professional misconduct because she used the Internet to counsel people to emulate her and sever ties with their families.


A disciplinary panel of the college heard Tuesday that Ms. Papadopoulos, a psychological associate, gave improper advice on a number podcasts made with her husband, Stefan Molyneux.


A self-described Internet philosopher, Mr. Molyneux is behind hundreds of posts, podcasts and videos on his website, Freedomain Radio, that discuss a range of topics from a libertarian mindset. "Stef and I, we have the capacity to help the world," Ms. Papadopoulos says in one podcast.




The couple has garnered little attention in Canada, but several parents from Britain and the United States have told The Globe and Mail that their children consulted Freedomain Radio, then became estranged from their families.


The college began investigating after two formal complaints, one in 2009 and the other in 2011.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,820
2,280
113
You think they're more like these two?
Frank, as you are someone who has never won an argument on merit in his life, I knew you'd be fully in favour of cancel culture. No surprise there.

But equating Molyneux with a white nationalist and a KKK leader is a distortion that even your muddled mind should be able to discern. Maybe the damage is much more extensive than I thought?
 

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
Frank, as you are someone who has never won an argument on merit in his life, I knew you'd be fully in favour of cancel culture. No surprise there.

But equating Molyneux with a white nationalist and a KKK leader is a distortion that even your muddled mind should be able to discern. Maybe the damage is much more extensive than I thought?
Molyneux advocates discredited racial science. He's a white supremacist, not a nationalist.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,820
2,280
113
Molyneux advocates discredited racial science. He's a white supremacist, not a nationalist.
Try to get your distortions straight. To follow your "logic", he's an Asian supremacist.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,718
17,862
113
Frank, as you are someone who has never won an argument on merit in his life, I knew you'd be fully in favour of cancel culture. No surprise there.
Life must be nice on whatever planet you live in, where you never lost an argument or backed racist killers James Fields or the McD's and you never lost an argument.
You claiming that you can't hear dog whistles now as well?

Social media are under pressure to ban hate speech, voters are abandoning Trump because of his racism and soon you'll only be able to post your views on boards like this again.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,820
2,280
113
Life must be nice on whatever planet you live in, where you never lost an argument or backed racist killers James Fields or the McD's and you never lost an argument.
You claiming that you can't hear dog whistles now as well?

Social media are under pressure to ban hate speech, voters are abandoning Trump because of his racism and soon you'll only be able to post your views on boards like this again.
Too bad you can't fill out other voter's ballots for them, eh Frank? That's the one "social media" where everyone will always be able to post their views!

Well, unless the Democrats succeed in a transition to mail-in ballots where people like you can fill them out for "the unenlightened".

Not sure if there are any rules against plagiarism here on TERB, but your view of utopia is awfully similar to a book by George Orwell. Intentionally or unintentionally?
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,718
17,862
113
Too bad you can't fill out other voter's ballots for them, eh Frank? That's the one "social media" where everyone will always be able to post their views!

Well, unless the Democrats succeed in a transition to mail-in ballots where people like you can fill them out for "the unenlightened".

Not sure if there are any rules against plagiarism here on TERB, but your view of utopia is awfully similar to a book by George Orwell. Intentionally or unintentionally?
Nah, all social media are private businesses and you are not free to post hate in their business.
You'll have to move to the dark web soon, reddit, 8chan and 4chan are all looking less friendly for you and your 'very fine people'.

Oh, if you're rereading Orwell you should compare thoughtspeak to Fox and Trump first.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,820
2,280
113
Nah, all social media are private businesses and you are not free to post hate in their business.
You'll have to move to the dark web soon, reddit, 8chan and 4chan are all looking less friendly for you and your 'very fine people'.

Oh, if you're rereading Orwell you should compare thoughtspeak to Fox and Trump first.
Frank,

Make up your mind on your "private business autonomy" concept. Either these business owners can do whatever they want, or "they are under pressure to control hate speech". Which is it? Besides, there's plenty of hate speech left on these platforms, it's just all pointed at one group. You're fooling no one to suggest that these social media outlets are doing anything other than trying to influence elections through their (temporary) control over speech in what has become the public square.

Did you ever even read 1984? The term is "newspeak", not "thoughtspeak". Or is your term intentional newspeak? Maybe that's your mother tongue!
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,718
17,862
113
Frank,

Make up your mind on your "private business autonomy" concept. Either these business owners can do whatever they want, or "they are under pressure to control hate speech". Which is it? Besides, there's plenty of hate speech left on these platforms, it's just all pointed at one group. You're fooling no one to suggest that these social media outlets are doing anything other than trying to influence elections through their (temporary) control over speech in what has become the public square.

Did you ever even read 1984? The term is "newspeak", not "thoughtspeak". Or is your term intentional newspeak? Maybe that's your mother tongue!
My bad, did a combo of thought police and newspeak, I haven't read that one in decades.

Businesses can do what they want and the advertisers that fund them can do what they want.
Social media like FB are losing advertisers, with about 1/3 about to leave if Zuckerberg doesn't stop the Orwellian fake news Trump is trying to flood the world with.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,820
2,280
113
My bad, did a combo of thought police and newspeak, I haven't read that one in decades.

Businesses can do what they want and the advertisers that fund them can do what they want.
Social media like FB are losing advertisers, with about 1/3 about to leave if Zuckerberg doesn't stop the Orwellian fake news Trump is trying to flood the world with.
So, it's Facebook's advertisers that are attempting to control speach in the public square and influence elections? That doesn't sound very democratic.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,718
17,862
113
So, it's Facebook's advertisers that are attempting to control speach in the public square and influence elections? That doesn't sound very democratic.
Facebook advertisers are responding to the pressures of their customers.
That's a combo of democratic and free market forces.
Don't you support the both of those?
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,820
2,280
113
Facebook advertisers are responding to the pressures of their customers.
That's a combo of democratic and free market forces.
Don't you support the both of those?
The thing is, I think you're lying. I don't believe these corporate advertisers have actually analyzed the commercial need to boycott media that opposes their politics. I think they've decided to support the Democrats because they think their companies will be more profitable under Democrat governance (whether or not they're right about that). No rational company would alienate half of its potential market unless they believed there were promises in the offing that more than offset that lost market share. In short, you should never trust political decisions being made by corporations - and that's exactly what you are doing.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,718
17,862
113
The thing is, I think you're lying. I don't believe these corporate advertisers have actually analyzed the commercial need to boycott media that opposes their politics. I think they've decided to support the Democrats because they think their companies will be more profitable under Democrat governance (whether or not they're right about that). No rational company would alienate half of its potential market unless they believed there were promises in the offing that more than offset that lost market share. In short, you should never trust political decisions being made by corporations - and that's exactly what you are doing.
Lying?

Ridiculous.
If you had any morals, you'd apologize.

 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,469
5,660
113
Molyneux advocates discredited racial science. He's a white supremacist, not a nationalist.
Absolutely true. This is what he has espoused for years:

 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts