YouTube Bans White Supremacists Stefan Molyneux, Richard Spencer, David Duke
reddit additionally banned 2,000 subreddits on Monday.
www.forbes.com
David Duke gets third billing? Not according to "Who's who in the Bigot world" he doesn't!YouTube Bans White Supremacists Stefan Molyneux, Richard Spencer, David Duke
reddit additionally banned 2,000 subreddits on Monday.www.forbes.com
In terms you might understand:YouTube Bans White Supremacists Stefan Molyneux, Richard Spencer, David Duke
reddit additionally banned 2,000 subreddits on Monday.www.forbes.com
You think they're more like these two?In terms you might understand:
One of these things is not like the others....
Frank, as you are someone who has never won an argument on merit in his life, I knew you'd be fully in favour of cancel culture. No surprise there.You think they're more like these two?
The Problem With Shane Dawson and Jeffree Star: What Happened to These YouTube Stars? (Published 2020)
Beauty YouTube as we knew it may be over as two major influencers face the next generation.www.nytimes.com
Molyneux advocates discredited racial science. He's a white supremacist, not a nationalist.Frank, as you are someone who has never won an argument on merit in his life, I knew you'd be fully in favour of cancel culture. No surprise there.
But equating Molyneux with a white nationalist and a KKK leader is a distortion that even your muddled mind should be able to discern. Maybe the damage is much more extensive than I thought?
Try to get your distortions straight. To follow your "logic", he's an Asian supremacist.Molyneux advocates discredited racial science. He's a white supremacist, not a nationalist.
Life must be nice on whatever planet you live in, where you never lost an argument or backed racist killers James Fields or the McD's and you never lost an argument.Frank, as you are someone who has never won an argument on merit in his life, I knew you'd be fully in favour of cancel culture. No surprise there.
Too bad you can't fill out other voter's ballots for them, eh Frank? That's the one "social media" where everyone will always be able to post their views!Life must be nice on whatever planet you live in, where you never lost an argument or backed racist killers James Fields or the McD's and you never lost an argument.
You claiming that you can't hear dog whistles now as well?
Social media are under pressure to ban hate speech, voters are abandoning Trump because of his racism and soon you'll only be able to post your views on boards like this again.
Nah, all social media are private businesses and you are not free to post hate in their business.Too bad you can't fill out other voter's ballots for them, eh Frank? That's the one "social media" where everyone will always be able to post their views!
Well, unless the Democrats succeed in a transition to mail-in ballots where people like you can fill them out for "the unenlightened".
Not sure if there are any rules against plagiarism here on TERB, but your view of utopia is awfully similar to a book by George Orwell. Intentionally or unintentionally?
Frank,Nah, all social media are private businesses and you are not free to post hate in their business.
You'll have to move to the dark web soon, reddit, 8chan and 4chan are all looking less friendly for you and your 'very fine people'.
Oh, if you're rereading Orwell you should compare thoughtspeak to Fox and Trump first.
My bad, did a combo of thought police and newspeak, I haven't read that one in decades.Frank,
Make up your mind on your "private business autonomy" concept. Either these business owners can do whatever they want, or "they are under pressure to control hate speech". Which is it? Besides, there's plenty of hate speech left on these platforms, it's just all pointed at one group. You're fooling no one to suggest that these social media outlets are doing anything other than trying to influence elections through their (temporary) control over speech in what has become the public square.
Did you ever even read 1984? The term is "newspeak", not "thoughtspeak". Or is your term intentional newspeak? Maybe that's your mother tongue!
So, it's Facebook's advertisers that are attempting to control speach in the public square and influence elections? That doesn't sound very democratic.My bad, did a combo of thought police and newspeak, I haven't read that one in decades.
Businesses can do what they want and the advertisers that fund them can do what they want.
Social media like FB are losing advertisers, with about 1/3 about to leave if Zuckerberg doesn't stop the Orwellian fake news Trump is trying to flood the world with.
Facebook advertisers are responding to the pressures of their customers.So, it's Facebook's advertisers that are attempting to control speach in the public square and influence elections? That doesn't sound very democratic.
The thing is, I think you're lying. I don't believe these corporate advertisers have actually analyzed the commercial need to boycott media that opposes their politics. I think they've decided to support the Democrats because they think their companies will be more profitable under Democrat governance (whether or not they're right about that). No rational company would alienate half of its potential market unless they believed there were promises in the offing that more than offset that lost market share. In short, you should never trust political decisions being made by corporations - and that's exactly what you are doing.Facebook advertisers are responding to the pressures of their customers.
That's a combo of democratic and free market forces.
Don't you support the both of those?
Lying?The thing is, I think you're lying. I don't believe these corporate advertisers have actually analyzed the commercial need to boycott media that opposes their politics. I think they've decided to support the Democrats because they think their companies will be more profitable under Democrat governance (whether or not they're right about that). No rational company would alienate half of its potential market unless they believed there were promises in the offing that more than offset that lost market share. In short, you should never trust political decisions being made by corporations - and that's exactly what you are doing.
Absolutely true. This is what he has espoused for years:Molyneux advocates discredited racial science. He's a white supremacist, not a nationalist.