Viewers' satellite, cable cost going up

bornonaug9

Member
Jan 21, 2003
374
0
16
Toronto
Will you cancel you cable or satellite package? Is it time to dump bundle and pay for individual channel?

http://www.thestar.com/business/article/679158

Cable and satellite bills are set to rise this fall as those TV service providers begin collecting a mandatory new fee to subsidize local television stations in small markets across Canada.

Cable giant Rogers Communications Inc. is sending a strongly worded letter to customers warning them to expect a new charge worth 1.5 per cent of their recurring TV monthly service fee, starting in September. The cost relates to the Local Programming Improvement Fund (LPIF), created by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, to subsidize stations in markets of less than one million people.

Rogers will dub it the "CRTC LPIF fee" on its invoices. That not-so-subtle political tactic comes as the industry prepares for upcoming CRTC hearings on the contentious fee-for-carriage issue, which could inflate bills further by about $6.50 a month in the Toronto market.
 

Mia.Colpa

Persian Lover
Dec 6, 2005
4,497
0
0
What else is new, there are 3 things in life you can always count on,

1. Death
2. Taxes
3. Bills

:(

Why would you cancel, look at the options, not much.
 

Brill

Well-known member
Jun 29, 2008
8,681
1,199
113
Toronto
Owning a TV station or a newspaper used to be a license to print money.

No longer the case!

It will get worse for them when more people are able to skip the ads.
 

needinit

New member
Jan 19, 2004
1,193
1
0
Sammy the Bull said:
Fuck cable TV, I simply hook up my PC to TV and watch here for free: www.justin.tv

Or here: http://www.ustream.tv/

I don't think of these as TV, they are online braodcasting. What's the difference? TV is the one where you see real shows, not stuff put online by whoever feels like it...www.hulu.com is much more like real TV (and you can see it form canada if you mask your IP address to become a US one).
 

oldnwrinkled

Member
Mar 19, 2002
379
0
16
needinit said:
I don't think of these as TV, they are online braodcasting. What's the difference? TV is the one where you see real shows, not stuff put online by whoever feels like it...www.hulu.com is much more like real TV (and you can see it form canada if you mask your IP address to become a US one).
is there a site I can learn how to mask my IP to become a US 1?

thanks
 

my2cents

Just Horny
Aug 22, 2001
809
0
16
between the sheets
So the broadcasters want fees for "local" programming sorry but all they did locally was the news in most cases and the news used to be a requirement of having a license. Broadcasters pushed to have that requirement removed so they didn't have to do local news. So they now want a fund for local programming, wonder who will oversee that every dollar is spent on local programming and not buying american programs. Ya right....
Also cable allows broadcasters to cover an area without having to put up a transmitter. Now with digital signals the clarity of over the air signals is better than cable so if they want the fee make them have to put up transmitters to cover their area so people have a choice. Frankly I get all my HD programming over the air free with a simple UHF antenna and an ATSC tuner. Better picture than cable.
 

tboy

resident smartass
Aug 18, 2001
15,972
2
0
63
way out in left field
Yup, I soooo hate having to watch commericals on stations that I have to pay extra for (tlc, history, discovery etc) so if the rates go up?

I'm cancelling my cable and go FTA.

Anything else I want I'll download it for free.......

Frankly I don't think we should subsidize shit.....now I know BET APTN and Punjabi TV are important to some, so THEY should pay for it not me......
 

Brookstone

Active member
Sep 11, 2004
1,600
2
38
These type of hikes are the reason why people are switching over to FTAs. Just look out any street, in the backyards, or even in the front and count how many dishes are out there for FTA use in one street alone. Hard to say no when there are constantly increases
 

wetnose

Gamahucher
Nov 14, 2006
2,444
0
36
milhouse said:
These type of hikes are the reason why people are switching over to FTAs. Just look out any street, in the backyards, or even in the front and count how many dishes are out there for FTA use in one street alone. Hard to say no when there are constantly increases
Isn't FTA down though?
 
Riley.Royal said:
ninjavideo.net for me and vip.tv-video.net
Sammy the Bull said:
Fuck cable TV, I simply hook up my PC to TV and watch here for free: www.justin.tv

Or here: http://www.ustream.tv/

I hate to say burst your bubble. :)

Technically it is not free for you both to either view those site and shows, you still have to download the media stream = data usage. So in fact you are using your internet bandwidth to view the site and it all depends on how much t.v you are watching online, your data usage plan on your internet package get eaten up pretty quickly. So you are still paying a fee no matter which way you look at it. Rogers is also set to raise their rates for internet users also.
 

elmufdvr

quen es tu papi???
Feb 21, 2002
1,109
0
0
toronto
who to contact..and which sat system to buy??/ pm info please ...
 

Liber Pater

New member
Feb 27, 2007
498
0
0
tboy said:
Frankly I don't think we should subsidize shit.....now I know BET APTN and Punjabi TV are important to some, so THEY should pay for it not me......
That is exactly the reason I cancelled my cable 8 years ago....
 

BoringBob

New member
Feb 13, 2009
574
0
0
Rogers is fast to mark a "tax" as a tax, but they should be so quick to mark the "Rogers needs to make 30% profit on this" line somewhere on the bill.

I would LOVE to see a bill where Rogers had to detail the actual breakdown of costs on the bill. There would be a huge drop in prices when they figured out they can't charge $8 for a package that only costs them $1.40 to acquire.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts