update - USSC invalidates Trump's tariffs 6:3

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
DOJ wants to know if ICE agents lied after judge drops assault case


The Department of Justice is opening a criminal investigation into whether federal immigration agents lied under oath after prosecutors dropped charges against two Venezuelan men accused of assaulting an officer in Minnesota.

A federal judge in Minneapolis agreed to dismiss the case Friday after evidence emerged showing the government’s version of events was “materially inconsistent with the allegations” against Alfredo Alejandro Aljorna and Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis, according to Minnesota’s top federal prosecutor.




The abrupt reversal follows an aggressive effort to prosecute the two men, who were accused of attacking an officer with a snow shovel and a broom handle, which Homeland Security secretary Kristi Noem called “attempted murder.” The officer, who was not named in court documents, fired his handgun and hit Sosa-Ceclis in the leg.

The one-page motion from Donald Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney Daniel Rosen said the government was backing off that case entirely, and dismissed the charges with prejudice, meaning they can’t be refiled.

In a statement Friday, Immigration and Customs Enforcement acting director Todd Lyons said sworn testimony about the incident from two officers appears to include “untruthful statements.”

“Both officers have been immediately placed on administrative leave pending the completion of a thorough internal investigation,” he added.


“Lying under oath is a serious federal offense. The U.S. Attorney’s Office is actively investigating these false statements. Upon conclusion of the investigation, the officers may face termination of employment, as well as potential criminal prosecution,” according to Lyons.

After the shooting, Noem accused Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey of “encouraging impeding and assault against our law enforcement which is a federal crime, a felony.”

“What we saw last night in Minneapolis was an attempted murder of federal law enforcement,” Noem said January 15, the day after the incident. “Our officer was ambushed and attacked by three individuals who beat him with snow shovels and the handles of brooms. Fearing for his life, the officer fired a defensive shot.”

In court hearings, the ICE officer’s account of the moments leading up to him firing his weapons appeared to be significantly different from testimony from the two defendants and three eyewitnesses.


His account that he was assaulted with a broom and snow shovel was also not backed up by video evidence or testimony from eyewitnesses.

In the FBI affidavit in support of the criminal complaint against the men, an ICE officer accused Sosa-Celis of using a broom to hit him “in his face” while he saw another man “approach him with a snow shovel” and “began striking” him.

After “tussling” with Aljorna, the officer said he was “alone, in the dark, facing the males” by himself, according to the affidavit. After breaking free, Aljorna looked back at the officer “with a scowl on his face,” Sosa-Celis handed him the broom, Aljorna “repeatedly struck” the officer, according to his testimony in the affidavit.

After the officer drew a pistol and fired one round, the men ran into a nearby apartment complex.

Officers then fired tear gas towards the building to draw them out, and the men surrendered over feared that young children inside would be hurt.



Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said the men committed ‘attempted murder’ in a case that has now been dismissed based on the government’s faulty evidence (AP)
A third Venezuelan man, Gabriel Alejandro Hernandez Ledezma, who lived in the apartment downstairs, was also arrested, though he was never charged.

He filed a petition seeking his release from ICE custody, arguing that he was unlawfully detained without a warrant and flown to an immigration detention center in Texas to prevent him from serving as a material eyewitness who could contradict the government’s claims.


A judge in Texas ordered his immediate return to Minnesota February 9.

The 19-year-old partner of one of the two men was also detained by immigration agents and transferred from Minnesota to El Paso and then New Mexico, where a judge ordered her release.

District Judge Paul Magnuson in Minneapolis had previously ordered Aljorna and Sosa released from pretrial detention and ordered ICE not to deport any witnesses before they could testify.

It remains unclear whether ICE will still seek to deport the two men.

The collapse of the case is the latest in a streak of losses for ICE and the Justice Department as the Trump administration seeks to rapidly deport thousands of people while failing to account for due process protections, according to federal judges across the country.

Dozens of felony cases against protesters accused of assaulting or impeding federal officers have also fallen apart in recent weeks, after Attorney General Pam Bondi promised “severe consequences.”


But an Associated Press review of 100 felony assault cases brought against demonstrators in Democratic-led cities over the last year found that 55 people had their cases reduced or dismissed altogether. At least 23 pleaded guilty to avoid trial, and most of them had charges reduced in plea deals that resulted in little or no jail time.

All five defendants whose cases went to trial so far have been acquitted.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
New video evidence deflates DOJ’s Don Lemon claims


The Trump administration's accusation against former CNN journalist Don Lemon appeared to be contradicted in a newly released piece of video, according to a Friday report from the Washington Post, casting significant doubt on the rationale given for his the charges brought against him.


Last month, Lemon, along with Twin Cities-based reporter Georgia Fort and several others, was arrested by federal officers in connection with his presence at a protest that took place at a St. Paul church weeks prior. Lemon and Fort asserted that they were present for the event as journalists covering it, but the federal indictment against them claims that they were "agitators" along with the rest of the protesters, who "entered the Church in a coordinated takeover-style attack."

The indictment did not characterize Lemon and Fort as reporters, aside from mentions of Lemon engaging in a livestream for his online show and Fort conducting an interview. They and the rest of the protesters are charged with conspiring to deprive congregants of their religious rights and of interfering with access to a place of worship. The DOJ alleged that they "oppressed, threatened, and intimidated" church attendees "by physically occupying most of the main aisle and rows of chairs near the front of the Church, engaging in menacing and threatening behavior."


Related video: Former CNN host Don Lemon arrives in court for hearing (The Canadian Press)


View on WatchView on Watch


"Don has been a journalist for 30 years, and his constitutionally protected work in Minneapolis was no different than what he has always done," Lemon's attorney, Abbe Lowell, said following his arrest.

On Friday, the Washington Post reported on footage of the protest from a Black Lives Matter livestream and a livestream conducted by Fort. At no point in the footage, the outlet explained, did Lemon appear to behave in a manner consistent with the allegations against him.

"Alive stream from Black Lives Matter Minnesota captures Lemon standing at the back of the sanctuary when the protest begins about two minutes later," the report detailed. "He soon moves forward to where the demonstrators are gathered and can be heard on his feed narrating the events for his audience. Fort’s live stream shows protesters chanting anti-ICE slogans and in some cases confronting parishioners... Lemon remains toward the front of the church — sometimes off to the side and sometimes near the main aisle — for roughly 16 minutes. "


The report continued: "For less than half of that time, he is off-camera but his feed remains live with audio from his microphone. His feed drops out entirely on several occasions for a few seconds at a time. The videos and audio reviewed by The Post contain no indication Lemon threatened church congregants or chanted or yelled."

At one point in the footage reviewed, Lemon can be heard saying, "I’m not part of the group; I’m just here photographing. I’m a journalist." Later on, he holds the door for people leaving the church, asking some for interviews. When one man declines the request, Lemon said, "Okay, thank you, I appreciate it." The two continue a heated back-and-forth after the man claimed to support the deportation operation in the Twin Cities area, with Lemon accusing him of not listening to facts and the man countering that Lemon was posing as a journalist. While tense, the Post noted that Lemon at no point prevented the man from exiting the building, as the indictment said.


“There is clearly no physical obstruction of that exit,” Judy Appelbaum, who worked as a lead congressional staffer involved in drafting the 1994 law that Lemon was charged under, explained to the Post. “And I don’t see any use of force, nor any threat of force.”
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
Goldman Sachs' top lawyer Kathy Ruemmler to resign after emails show close ties to Jeffrey Epstein


NEW YORK (AP) — Kathy Ruemmler, the top lawyer at storied investment bank Goldman Sachs and former White House counsel to President Barack Obama, announced her resignation Thursday, after emails between her and Jeffrey Epstein showed a close relationship where she described him as an “older brother” and downplayed his sex crimes.

Ruemmler said in a statement that she would "step down as Chief Legal Officer and General Counsel of Goldman Sachs as of June 30, 2026.”

Up until her resignation, Ruemmler repeatedly tried to distance herself from the emails and other correspondence and had been defiant that she would not resign from Goldman’s top legal post, which she had held since 2020.

While Ruemmler has called Epstein a “monster” in recent statements, she had a much different relationship with Epstein before he was arrested a second time for sex crimes in 2019 and later killed himself in a Manhattan jail. Ruemmler called Epstein “Uncle Jeffrey” in emails and said she adored him.

In a statement before her resignation, a Goldman Sachs spokesperson said Ruemmler “regrets ever knowing him.”

In her statement Thursday, Ruemmler said: “Since I joined Goldman Sachs six years ago, it has been my privilege to help oversee the firm’s legal, reputational, and regulatory matters; to enhance our strong risk management processes; and to ensure that we live by our core value of integrity in everything we do. My responsibility is to put Goldman Sachs’ interests first."


A document that was included in the U.S. Department of Justice release of the Jeffrey Epstein files, photographed Tuesday, Feb. 10, 2026, shows a photo of Epstein on a inmate report from the Federal Bureau of Prisons . (AP Photo/Jon Elswick)

A document that was included in the U.S. Department of Justice release of the Jeffrey Epstein files, photographed Tuesday, Feb. 10, 2026, shows a photo of Epstein on a inmate report from the Federal Bureau of Prisons . (AP Photo/Jon Elswick)© The Associated Press
Goldman CEO David Solomon said in a separate statement: "As one of the most accomplished professionals in her field, Kathy has also been a mentor and friend to many of our people, and she will be missed. I accepted her resignation, and I respect her decision.”

During her time in private practice after she left the White House in 2014, Ruemmler received several expensive gifts from Epstein, including luxury handbags and a fur coat. The gifts were given after Epstein had already been convicted of sex crimes in 2008 and was registered as a sex offender.


Related video: Goldman Sachs' top lawyer Kathy Ruemmler to resign after emails show close ties to Jeffrey Epstein (The Canadian Press)


View on WatchView on Watch


“So lovely and thoughtful! Thank you to Uncle Jeffrey!!!” Ruemmler wrote to Epstein in 2018.

Historically, Wall Street frowns on gift-giving between clients and bankers or Wall Street lawyers, particularly high-end gifts that could pose a conflict of interest. Goldman Sachs requires its employees to get preapproval before receiving gifts from or giving them to clients, according to the company’s code of conduct, partly in order to not run afoul of anti-bribery laws.

As late as December, Goldman CEO David Solomon described Ruemmler as an “excellent lawyer” and said she had his full faith and backing.

Ken Sweet, The Associated Press
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
Trump aims for 200 cases a month on revoking naturalized citizenship


The Trump administration is moving ahead with plans to strip some foreign-born Americans of their citizenship, with a target of 200 cases a month, according to a report.

In December 2025, guidance was provided to offices of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the agency within the Department of Homeland Security, requesting that they “supply the Office of Immigration Litigation with 100-200 denaturalization cases per month” in 2026.


The plans are now in motion, according to NBC News. Experts with the immigration agency have reportedly been carrying out visits to offices around the country and reassigning staff to review whether some citizens processed there could be denaturalized, people familiar with the plans told the outlet.

It is rare to strip someone of their citizenship. Between 1990 and 2017, there were only 11 denaturalization cases on average each year, according to the Brennan Center for Justice.

Individuals may only be legally stripped of their U.S. citizenship for a few specific reasons, such as if they committed fraud during the citizenship application process.

Matthew Tragesser, a spokesperson for the immigration agency, said the administration was focusing on cases where there was credible evidence that citizenship was obtained through fraud or misrepresentation.


“We maintain a zero-tolerance policy towards fraud in the naturalization process and will pursue denaturalization proceedings for any individual who lied or misrepresented themselves,” Tragesser told the outlet. “We will continue to relentlessly pursue those undermining the integrity of America’s immigration system and work alongside the Department of Justice to ensure that only those who meet citizenship standards retain the privilege of U.S. citizenship.”

When the plans were first reported last year, Tragesser said it was “no secret” that the agency was pursuing a “war on fraud.”

In 2024, there were approximately 26 million naturalized U.S. citizens residing in the U.S., and the immigration agency’s website said it has “welcomed more than 7.9 million naturalized citizens” to the United States in the last decade.



Experts with the immigration agency have reportedly been carrying out visits to offices around the country and reassigning staff to review whether some citizens processed there could be denaturalized (Getty Images)
In a Department of Justice memorandum issued in June 2025, President Donald Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi made clear the administration would “prioritize and maximally pursue denaturalization proceedings in all cases permitted by law and supported by the evidence.”

The agency said it intended to take action against citizens that it believes “pose a potential danger to national security,” or who officials claim have acquired their citizenship through “material misrepresentations.”


At the time, advocacy groups and immigration attorneys warned that such expansive guidelines could result in a broad swath of U.S. citizens being targeted.

Trump has deployed a number of tactics to achieve what he called “the largest deportation program” in U.S. history, supported by a $170 billion spending package passed by Congress for immigration enforcement and detention.

The crackdown has been wide-ranging. Federal agents have been sent to carry out raids in cities across the country, including in Minnesota, where two American citizens were killed in protests, and people who are attending mandated check-ins with Immigration and Customs Enforcement and hearings at courthouses are being targeted for arrest.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
Murky Trump DHS case falls apart as new evidence undermines case


The Trump administration claimed in a new court filing that it discovered "new evidence" in a case where it charged migrants with attacking immigration officers, which made the initial lawsuit even murkier, according to a new report.

In early February, the Trump administration filed charges against two immigrant men who were accused of attacking Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers with a shovel and a broom, an incident that left one individual with a gunshot wound in his leg. Officers also nabbed a 19-year-old witness to the event, who happened to be a romantic partner of one of the two other men involved.




On Thursday, the Trump administration moved to dismiss the charges, citing "newly discovered evidence" that called the initial charges into question, Politico's Kyle Cheney reported.

"Newly discovered evidence in this matter is materially inconsistent with the allegations in the Complaint Affidavit, filed on January 16, 2026 ... as well as the preliminary-hearing testimony ... that was based on information presented to the Affiant," U.S. Attorney Daniel Rosen in Minnesota wrote in his court filing. "Accordingly, dismissal with prejudice will serve the interests of justice."
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
Judge shuts down Trump's attempt to defund blue states


The New York Times reports a federal judge in Illinois blocked the Trump administration’s plot to snatch $600 million in public health funds from four states led by Democrats.

“Judge Manish S. Shah of the Federal District Court in Northern Illinois wrote in a two-page order that the plaintiff states — California, Colorado, Illinois and Minnesota — had provided enough evidence that the cuts were ‘based on arbitrary, capricious or unconstitutional rationales’ to halt what would have been deep cuts in federal public health funding that had already been allocated while legal arguments continue in the case,” reports the Times.


Some of the $600 million in grants was intended to help specific populations, often communities of color or gay and bisexual men, which scratches against the Trump administration’s campaign against federal funding for underprivileged racial and socioeconomic groups.

This order, said the Times, is the latest ruling squashing President Donald Trump’s broader effort to impose politically motivated federal cuts to Democratic-led states. Just last week, another federal judge extended an unrelated order blocking the Trump administration from withholding $10 billion in child care and social services funding in the same four states, as well as New York — despite New York paying, on average, $20 billion more in taxes%202018%20than%20it%20got%20back%20in%20federal%20spending) to the federal government than it gets back in federal spending.

The Times reports a court also blocked Trump’s plan to suspend funding of food stamps and other hunger relief programs in Minnesota.

Judge Shah did not specify the $600 million in grants in his decision, but applied his ruling broadly to block the Trump administration from terminating all public health grants “based on undisclosed agency priorities.”

While judges are heartily attacking Trump’s attempts to defund blue targets others are dismantling Trump’s other endeavors. On Thursday, GOP-appointed Judge Richard Leon issued a scathing ruling in Sen. Mark Kelly's (D-Ariz.) lawsuit against the Pentagon, which sought to demote him for appearing in a video reminding soldiers that they do not have to carry out unconstitutional orders.

A Manhattan federal judge, meanwhile, put an end to Trump’s attempted extortion of New York and New Jersey residents by ordering the administration to “unfreeze funding for a sprawling project paving the way for work to resume on a new set of Hudson River tunnels.”
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
Judge slams Trump officials after bungled deportation


A Boston federal judge has handed down a stern rebuke to the Trump administration, ordering officials to bring back a 20-year-old Honduran college student who was deported in flagrant violation of a court order.

U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns gave the administration just two weeks to facilitate the return of Any Lucia Lopez Belloza, a Babson College freshman who was yanked from Boston's Logan Airport and flown to Honduras in November despite her lawyer securing a protection order the day before, Reuters reported.


The dramatic ruling came after the administration repeatedly refused to cooperate. The State Department called issuing Lopez Belloza a new student visa "unfeasible," while Immigration and Customs Enforcement flatly declined to help bring her back.

"Wisdom counsels that redemption may be found by acknowledging and fixing our own errors," Stearns wrote in his decision. "In this unfortunate case, the government commendably admits that it did wrong. Now it is time for the government to make amends.



Lopez Belloza, who arrived in America at age 8 with her mother seeking asylum, said she had no idea she faced a deportation order. An ICE officer's failure to properly flag her protection order led to the bungled deportation, which government lawyers admitted was a "mistake."

She's now waiting in Honduras with her grandparents, hoping to return to her studies.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
Trump facing bleak future as GOP 'retirement caucus' defections grow beyond his control


Following a pair of losses in the House where a smattering of Republican lawmakers joined with Democrats to push back against Donald Trump initiatives that are near and dear to his heart, the president can expect more blows to his agenda according to GOP House members.

According to Politico reporter Meredith Lee Hill, Republicans' razor-thin House majority leaves them vulnerable to coordinated opposition. Rep. Don Bacon (R-NE) and Rep. Tom Massie (R-KY) both highlighted how the narrow GOP margin magnifies the impact of defections.



Hill noted, "Thanks to the thin margins in both chambers—especially the House—a few steel-spined lawmakers can have an outsized impact. That's a change from the dynamics in Trump's first term, when many House Republicans weren't fully on board with the president's MAGA agenda, but the GOP had a much larger majority to work with."

Massie, a frequent Trump critic, contended he needs to persuade only one or two Republican colleagues to constrain the president's initiatives. This dynamic frustrates GOP leadership committed to supporting Trump.



Bacon acknowledged that some colleagues "live in fear" of Trump retaliation, but they are increasingly grumbling behind the scenes. Massie predicted further defections as members complete their primary campaigns: "The retirement caucus is growing. Once we get past March, April, and May, which contain a large portion of their Republican primaries, I think you're going to see more defections."


Speaker Mike Johnson faces constant pressure maintaining party unity. He can currently afford to lose only a single GOP member on party-line votes. While upcoming special elections may slightly improve his position, the House Republican majority will likely remain extremely narrow.

You can read more here.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
Another case of Trump officials distorting a shooting incident emerges


Two US immigration enforcement officers are now under federal investigation after it was revealed that they seem to have lied about the circumstances that led up to the shooting of a Venezuelan immigrant last month.

As reported by Politico on Friday, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Acting Director Todd Lyons acknowledged that two federal officers appear “to have made untruthful statements” about a confrontation in Minneapolis in January that culminated in one of the officers shooting Venezuelan national Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis in the leg.


The officers claimed that Sosa-Celis and another Venezuelan immigrant, Alfredo Aljorna, assaulted them with a broom and a shovel, which forced one of the officers to open fire in self-defense.

While the two men had been charged with assaulting the officers in the wake of the shooting, charges against them were abruptly dismissed on Thursday when prosecutors revealed that “newly discovered evidence in this matter is materially inconsistent with the allegations” made under oath by the officers.

Lyons said that the US Department of Justice (DOJ) is now investigating the two officers, who have been placed on administrative leave until the probe concludes.

US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem last month defended the officers and parroted their claims about the shooting.

“What we saw last night in Minneapolis was an attempted murder of federal law enforcement,” Noem claimed. “Our officer was ambushed and attacked by three individuals who beat him with snow shovels and the handles of brooms. Fearing for his life, the officer fired a defensive shot.”

Noem has come under fire in recent weeks for lying about shootings involving federal immigration officials, such as when she falsely claimed that slain Minneapolis intensive care nurse Alex Pretti was aiming “to inflict maximum damage on individuals and to kill law enforcement” while filming officers’ activities.

In reality, video footage showed Pretti never drew his handgun during his deadly confrontation with federal immigration officers, while also clearly showing that officers disarmed him before they opened fire.

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, said that the newly uncovered evidence in Sosa-Celis’ case showed that the officer not only didn’t discharge his weapon in self-defense, but he “fired his gun through a closed door, striking the people inside.”

The Minnesota House of Representatives Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) Caucus accused federal immigration agents of systematically lying to cover up unjustified shootings.


“They’re hiding evidence, stifling investigations, and fabricating information,” wrote the Minnesota House DFL on social media. “They’re lying to your face. We won’t let them get away with it—Minnesotans deserve justice.”

US Rep. Rob Menedez (D-NJ) said that lying appears to be endemic in the entire Trump administration.

“The Trump administration has consistently lied about ICE’s violent acts toward Americans and the abuses that this agency perpetuates every day,” he wrote. “They aren’t afraid to lie about members of Congress, and they certainly aren’t afraid to lie about any American they have killed, shot, or assaulted. This agency cannot continue to exist.”
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
How one bullet destroyed DHS claim agents were afraid for their lives


The battle over the truth behind Renee Nicole Good's shooting persists after the federal government refused to cooperate with state and local authorities to investigate its own shooting by a federal agent. She's not the only one. The feds also tried to take over the shooting death of Alex Jeffrey Pretti.


What has unfolded in the weeks after is drawing attention to the false narratives coming out of the Department of Homeland Security. It's still unknown whether Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or Customs and Border Protection (CPB) officers on the ground lied to DHS or if DHS spun its own tale about what happened without speaking with the shooters. Over and over, DHS claims that officers were afraid for their lives.

The Daily Beast's Michael Daly pointed to a non-fatal shooting that is drawing further attention to officials who gave public statements after the incident.

Venezuelan Julio Cesar Sosa-Celis survived his ICE encounter, receiving only a shot to his leg. The story Noem concocted was that an incident with a food delivery driver constituted “an attempted murder of federal law enforcement.”

“Our officer was ambushed and attacked by three individuals who beat him with snow shovels and the handles of brooms,” she claimed.


But there was another bullet hole found in the front door of Sosa-Celis' home that points to two very different accounts. Two eyewitnesses said that they witnessed the federal agent fire his gun into the door.

It means "Sosa-Celis was struck after he entered the house, so he could not have constituted a threat. The bullet was later found to have torn through the door and into the apartment," the report said.

Attorney Frederick Goetz, who is representing Sosa-Celis' friend Alfredo Alejandro Aljorna, told the Beast that they found the bullet embedded “between a child’s bed and a crib."

Both children, ages 1 and 3, were in the home at the time the officer fired into the door.

A 911 call records Sosa-Celis and his wife, Indriany Mendoza Camacho, saying in Spanish, “They shot through the door."

She later gave a statement that Sosa-Celis wasn't even the person ICE had been chasing after for fleeing a car stop. Indeed, they were following Aljorna. Still, ICE drove her and the two children out with tear gas as they hid in an upstairs bedroom. All were arrested and taken out of state the following morning.


ICE then fired tear gas at the crowd that was gathering outside of the home.

While the cases to get the men back from a Texas detention facility were sealed by the court, The Minneapolis Star Tribune has seen them and the eyewitness accounts. They allege they saw "an unnamed ICE agent punch and choke Aljorna. Sosa-Celis sought to help his friend."

“Seeing Alfredo in danger, Julio intervened and attempted to separate Alfredo from the man beating him and choking him — pulling on Alfredo towards the house to get him away from his attacker,” a petition says. “At no time did either Alfredo or Julio use or threaten to use a weapon, nor wield any object that could be deployed as a weapon, against the man assaulting Alfredo.”

While they accused the two men of attacking them with a broom handle and shovel, those objects were never recovered by the agents to prove their case.


It was the same incident in which a family was driving home when ICE attacked their vehicle, throwing tear gas canisters under their car, flooding it with toxic chemicals, and deploying their airbags. It was at that point that their 6-month-old baby stopped breathing.

Since the incident, that family has been flooded with "threats and hateful messages," the AP said in a report at the time.

Another incident in Illinois involves Marimar Martinez, who was shot five times by agents and still managed to survive. In that case, her lawyer is still fighting against DHS for narratives he said are false and he can prove it.

Appearing on CNN, her lawyer, Christopher Parente, said that they are both clear-eyed that nothing they do or say will change President Donald Trump or his administration. What they do hope is that telling her story will expose the misinformation coming from DHS.


In her case, DHS claimed, again, that agents were afraid for their lives. The department alleged that their vehicle was boxed in by cars that were trying to attack them. The video Parente has shows a completely different story. There were construction cones to their right, no one in front of them, and Martinez was driving around them when they shot into her car as she drove away.

"Tricia McLaughlin [assistant secretary for public affairs] from DHS is still, to this day, putting out this testimony that these agents, these statements that these agents were boxed in, that they couldn't move," said Parente.

The story is repeated over and over. In Good's case, she ran into an officer with her car and he fired, afraid for his life. In Pretti's case, as the man lay on the ground, detained by several men, they were still afraid for their lives. A family was boxed in between protesters on their street, and somehow, officers were afraid for their lives and needed to deploy tear gas at them.


Claiming fear of death is a legal standard set by the U.S. Supreme Court case in 1989, in which officers must claim there was an “objectively reasonable” belief that, without their actions, there would be danger or harm to themselves or others. So, each example of federal officers' use of force will come with a similar defense from DHS.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
Only 2 percent of Epstein files have been released by DOJ: analysis


The UK's Channel 4 News reported this week that the Justice Department isn't being honest about what they have on trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, his accomplices and the years of investigation done by the federal government.
According to its analysis of emails in the latest batch of 3.5 million pages, the Epstein files suggest that what has been released is only a small fraction of what there is. "Potentially only 2 percent of the information the FBI retrieved from Epstein’s homes," is what has been shared with the public.

Survivors of Epstein have told members of Congress and the media that the Justice Department has consistently refused to follow the law passed by Congress mandating the release.
Speaking to the House Judiciary Committee last week, Attorney General Pam Bondi refused to meet with survivors. In fact, she wouldn't even turn around to look at them when they were acknowledged. Instead, she demanded that Congress spend its time praising Dow Jones stock numbers rather than asking about the Epstein files.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
Former federal judge stunned at DOJ’s unprecedented string of grand jury defeats


Donald Trump and his administration are increasingly being held back from their broader goals by everyday citizens in court, and according to one former federal judge speaking with Salon, these rebukes are an "unprecedented" change in legal norms.

In the modern American legal system, grand juries are a special sort of jury convened to either approve or deny a prosecutor's request to bring significant criminal charges against certain parties. Grand juries notably voted to indict Trump on criminal charges in the four legal cases he faced prior to his reelection.


In general, legal experts have said that it is extremely common for grand juries to approve indictments, as they are merely determining whether there is "probable cause" for charges, not whether or not the accused parties are guilty or innocent. Despite that, the Trump administration has faced a striking trend of grand juries refusing to sign off on criminal charges it has attempted to bring against its perceived enemies.

Grand juries in Washington D.C., last year refused to indict the man who threw a Subway sandwich at law enforcement officers taking part in Trump's mobilization in the city. More recently, grand juries also refused to bring charges against a group of six Democratic lawmakers who stoked the ire of the administration by appearing in a video reminding military members of their obligation to disobey illegal orders.

On Monday, Salon published an interview with John E. Jones III, a former federal judge and president of Dickinson College, in which he explained just how "unprecedented" this string of grand jury defeats is, calling even one failed indictment almost unheard of during his own legal career and breaking down what it takes for such a decision to be reached.


"It’s unprecedented, although we now see a wave of grand juries pushing back against the government," Jones said. "I don’t recall a single instance, during the almost 20 years I served as a U.S. District judge, when a grand jury refused to return a true bill, an indictment. It just is completely aberrational."

He continued: "The grand jury would have to totally reject the whole premise of the case that’s being presented to them by the United States attorney because, remember, there are typically no witnesses appearing before the grand jury to dispute the facts. The grand jury is clearly saying, 'Even accepting the facts you’re putting before us as true, we don’t think under these circumstances this case is worthy of a federal indictment.'"

Jones further explained that, in addition to grand jury indictments being common due to the lower "probable cause" threshold, they are also common because they are more "one-sided" arguments, with only prosecutors present.


"There are no defense attorneys present. There’s a court reporter, the grand jury, the United States attorney, and such witnesses as the United States attorney decides to call," Jones explained. "While the target of a grand jury can endeavor to present witnesses, including themselves, that generally never happens because of the danger of self-incrimination."
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
Trump admin gets sharp rebuke as judge outright terminates high-profile deportation case


An immigration judge has axed the Trump administration's deportation case against Mohsen Mahdawi, a Columbia University graduate student and pro-Palestinian activist, marking another major legal blow to the government's crackdown on college campus demonstrators in recent weeks.


The judge terminated the case after determining the government failed to properly authenticate a crucial document, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing Mahdawi's legal team. The 35-year-old Palestinian green-card holder faced charges of posing a "foreign-policy threat" to the U.S. following his detention in April at a citizenship interview in Vermont.



"I am grateful to the court for honoring the rule of law and holding the line against the government’s attempts to trample on due process," Mahdawi said.

Mahdawi arrived in the U.S. in 2014 after growing up in a West Bank refugee camp. He organized demonstrations at the Ivy League institution during the administration's spring campus crackdown targeting what it characterized as antisemitism and extremist ideology. He was among several high-profile activists detained and accused of threatening national security through their activism.



Though the dismissal prevents immediate deportation, the administration retains options to appeal or refile charges. Mahdawi's case follows the recent dismissal of charges against Tufts student Rumeysa Ozturk, who spent weeks in detention after police arrested her on a street, claiming she posed a deportation risk for co-writing a pro-Palestinian opinion piece.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
Supreme Court's dubious attempt to address major ethics issue leaves expert in awe


Legal expert Chris Geidner tore into the Supreme Court on his Law Dork blog for making an "embarrassing" roundabout ethics rule change that is meant to look like they're preventing conflicts of interest with individual stock ownership — while in fact allowing the two justices who trade individual stocks to keep doing so.


"Did the justices agree to divest from individual stock ownership — which would be the cleanest, most ethical, and easiest step, especially given that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Sam Alito are the only two justices who currently own individual stocks? Of course not," chided Geidner. "The Chief Justice of the United States will literally change the rules of the Supreme Court of the United States instead of divesting in individual stocks. Really."


This is a ludicrous move, wrote Geidner, and it's designed to work with a new piece of software for the court to make "automated recusal checks."

"The Supreme Court of the United States spent time and money to create new software to run conflicts checks, and part of that includes checks relating to individual stocks owned by justices," wrote Geidner. "Because two justices own stocks — Roberts refuses to divest and Alito is apparently eagerly day-trading — the Supreme Court had to spend time and money in the development of this new system to integrate stock ownership conflict checks. And now, starting in March, every party going to the Supreme Court is going to need to go along with this CNBC-style ticker-tape rule because of their intransigence."



These issues have popped up before, Geidner noted, as Alito had to recuse from a case that involved an oil and gas company he owned stock in.

Gabe Roth, founder of Fix the Court, said in response to the change, “Public service also demands public input, and it’s a bit ridiculous that the Court can simply release new rules without a notice-and-comment period or opportunity for public views. It’s yet another example of the Court acting exceptionally in all the wrong ways.“

All of this comes as Congress has wrestled for years with a debate about banning senators and representatives from trading individual stocks, a common practice that has led to numerous appearances of corruption — like a Pennsylvania Republican who bought stock in AI companies while pushing data center construction in his district.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
FBI, St. Paul police probing ICE arrest that resulted in skull fractures


MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — Minnesota and federal authorities are investigating the alleged beating of a Mexican citizen by immigration officers last month, seeking to identify what caused the eight skull fractures that landed the man in the intensive care unit of a Minneapolis hospital.


Investigators from the St. Paul Police Department and FBI last week canvassed the shopping center parking lot where Alberto Castañeda Mondragón says Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents wrested him from a vehicle, threw him to the ground and repeatedly struck him in the head with a steel baton.

ICE has blamed Castañeda Mondragón for his own injuries, saying he attempted to flee while handcuffed and “fell and hit his head against a concrete wall.”

But hospital staff who treated the man told The Associated Press such a fall could not plausibly account for the man's brain hemorrhaging and fragmented memory. A CT scan showed fractures to the front, back and both sides of his skull — injuries a doctor told the AP were inconsistent with a fall.

Earlier this month, the AP published an interview with Castañeda Mondragón in which he said the arresting officers had been “racist” and “ started beating me right away when they arrested me.” His lawyers have contended ICE racially profiled him.


In separate visits to the shopping center last week, local and federal investigators requested surveillance footage from at least two businesses, whose employees told the AP their cameras either did not capture the Jan. 8 arrest or the images had been overwritten because more than a month passed before law enforcement asked for the video.

Johnny Ratana, who owns Teepwo Market, an Asian grocery store that faces the parking lot where the arrest occurred, said St. Paul police twice sent investigators to the business in recent days. The second time, he said, a data technician sought to recover images automatically overwritten after 30 days.

Ratana said he also was visited by FBI agents interested in the same footage.

The St. Paul Police Department did not respond to requests for comment. The FBI declined to comment.

The investigations come amid another federal probe into whether two ICE officers lied under oath about a shooting in Minneapolis. Federal prosecutors dropped charges against two Venezuelan men — who had been accused of attacking one of the officers with a snow shovel and broom handle — after video evidence contradicted the officers' sworn testimony.


The FBI, meanwhile, notified Minnesota authorities last week it would not share any information or evidence it collected in the Jan. 24 fatal shooting of Alex Pretti by federal immigration officers. That killing is the subject of a Justice Department civil rights investigation.

For weeks, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security refused to discuss any aspect of Castañeda Mondragón's injuries. It has not answered detailed questions from the AP, including whether its officers recorded body-worn camera footage of the arrest.

Agency insists man injured himself

But the agency last week doubled down on its claim that Castañeda Mondragón injured himself.

“On January 8, 2026, ICE conducted a targeted enforcement operation to arrest Alberto Castaneda Mondragon, a 31-year-old illegal alien from Mexico who overstayed his visa,” said Tricia McLaughlin, the department’s assistant secretary for public affairs “While in handcuffs, Castaneda attempted to escape custody and ran toward a main highway. While running, Castaneda fell and hit his head against a concrete wall.”


McLaughlin’s assertion that Castañeda Mondragón had been targeted for removal was contradicted by a Jan. 20 court filing in which ICE said officers only determined the man overstayed his work visa after he was in custody. McLaughlin did not respond to questions about which account was correct.

Castañeda Mondragón's lawyers declined to comment on ICE's statement.

Delay could affect investigations

The criminal investigations could be complicated by the amount of time it took law enforcement to look into the arrest, even as several elected officials called for answers.

St. Paul police told the AP on Feb. 5 that it was aware of "the serious allegations” surrounding the arrest but that it could not begin investigating Castañeda Mondragón’s injuries until he filed a police report — a step that was delayed weeks because of the man’s hospitalization and uncertainty over his immigration status. Police finally took his statement a week ago at the Mexican consulate.


By that point, at least one nearby business had overwritten its surveillance footage.

“It is my expectation that we will investigate past and future allegations of criminal conduct by federal agents to seek the truth and hold accountable anyone who has violated Minnesota law,” John Choi, the chief prosecutor of Ramsey County, said in a statement.

Castañeda Mondragón has been summoned to meet with ICE on Feb. 23 at its main detention facility in Minneapolis, raising the potential he could be taken back into custody and deported.

___ Biesecker reported from Washington and Brook from New Orleans. AP reporter Cedar Attanasio contributed from Seattle.

Jim Mustian, Michael Biesecker And Jack Brook, The Associated Press
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
ICE ignored increase in use of force reports involving agents: report


Internal communications between Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials show that they were aware, just two months into President Donald Trump’s second administration, that reports of ICE officers using force had risen 353 percent compared to the previous year.

Long before the administration launched deadly immigration enforcement operations in Minnesota, ICE officials had reported 67 use-of-force incidents between January 19, 2025, and March 20, 2025, according to emails obtained in a Freedom of Information Act request by American Oversight.


Some of those reports included incidents of ICE officers using tasers, pepper spray and physical force to detain targeted individuals who were trying to evade or resist arrest. In some of those instances, detainees needed medical attention, including one where a man repeatedly vomited after being tased.

But rather than acknowledge the uptick in use-of-force incidents, ICE officials chose to highlight the 28 reported assaults on ICE officers – a 460 percent increase from the same period in 2024.

“Of note is the huge increase in [law enforcement officer] assaults,” a Firearms & Tactical Programs unit chief wrote in response to the numbers. The unit chief suggested finding a way to present some instances for prosecution.

“I know Charleston incorporated 18 USC 111 into prosecutions training a couple of years ago, they may be able to package up a summary of the needed elements of the crime, definitions of what constitutes assualt, etc with the intent of broadcasting to the workforce in an effort to drive more prosecutions for prosecution,” the unit chief wrote.


A DHS spokesperson defended the agency’s record when asked about it by The Independent.

“DHS law enforcement officers are trained to use the minimum amount of force necessary to deescalate dangerous situations to prioritize the safety of the public and our officers. Officers are highly trained in de-escalation tactics and regularly receive ongoing use of force training. The agency’s current use of force policy is the same as it was in 2023 under President Biden’s administration,” they said.

DHS officials, including Secretary Kristi Noem and outgoing spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin, have repeatedly emphasized the more than 1,000 percent increase in attacks on federal agents and officers when asked about the use of excessive force.

After federal agents fatally shot 37-year-old Renee Good in Minnesota, officials were quick to defend the agent who fired three shots into her vehicle, claiming it was done in an act of self-defense because Good was trying to run him over with her car. Videos of the incident painted a different picture.


Similarly, White House officials defended federal agents after they fatally shot 37-year-old Alex Pretti in Minnesota, asserting that he was a “domestic terrorist” trying to murder immigration enforcement. Again, videos of the encounter contradicted the narrative from administration officials.


Department of Homeland Security’s Inspector General is reviewing whether the agency has addressed allegations of execessive force during immigration enforcement (Getty Images)

Department of Homeland Security’s Inspector General is reviewing whether the agency has addressed allegations of execessive force during immigration enforcement (Getty Images)
Recently, a federal judge dropped charges against a Venezuelan man accused of assaulting ICE officers during an arrest after it was revealed that the federal immigration agents may have lied under oath about the events leading up to the incident.

The Department of Homeland Security’s Inspector General, the independent watchdog within the department, is investigating whether the agency has been addressing allegations of excessive force and holding personnel accountable.


ICE officers are trained to use “necessary and reasonable” force against protesters, even while being disruptive, by first trying to defuse the situation, according to documents obtained by American Oversight.

They are also taught to determine how much force to apply during an arrest based on the level of threat a suspect poses and how a reasonable person would interpret that use of force.

“An officer should use only the minimum amount of force necessary and reasonable to overcome resistance,” the Fourth Amendment training package states.
and across the world, pluralism, reason, a progressive and humanitarian agenda, and internationalism – Independent values – are under threat. Yet we, The Independent, continue to grow.
 

mandrill

monkey
Aug 23, 2001
89,173
141,138
113
Donald Trump makes late-night Truth Social post about elections


Donald Trump has added fuel to the fire of his election fraud claim with a late-night Truth Social post.

The president shared quotes from former co-director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Dan Bongino's latest podcast episode, where he and John Solomon spoke of Trump's claim of election fraud in 2020. Trump has shared this unverified claim of election fraud several times since the results of the 2020 election, and has since made further comment.



A post sharing quotes from Bongino and Solomon has been screenshot and shared to the president's Truth Social timeline.

The post reads, "He is going to start revealing some of the intelligence that was kept from the American people. And we're going to see that our foreign adversaries have monkeyed around with our (election) system more than we knew...



"And I think when Senators realize their state could have been targeted... There is going to be a different debate in America..." Trump commented on the quotes in the screenshot.

He wrote, "Crooked Elections cannot be allowed in the U.S.A. President DJT." During his second term in office, Trump's administration searched an election hub in Fulton County, Georgia.


The location is one of Trump's primary targets with his election fraud claims. Agents were seen going into the Fulton County Election Hub and Operation Center, with Fox News reporting that the outlet had been searched as part of a probe into the 2020 election.

The hub facility was opened in 2023 by state officials to streamline the county's election process.

Trump was indicted by a Fulton County grand jury along with 18 co-defendants in 2023 on charges related to his efforts to overturn his election loss to Joe Biden, but that case was ultimately dismissed after district attorney Fani Willis was removed over an improper relationship with a special prosecutor.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts