Toronto Escorts

Trudeau's coverup of Vance allegations matches his own coverup

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
23,030
46,145
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau walks to a news conference in the Parliamentary precinct on a rainy day in Ottawa, Friday, April 30, 2021. PHOTO BY ADRIAN WYLD /THE
Over the weekend, Maj.-Gen. Peter Dawe was relieved of his post at the top of Canada’s Special Forces over his handling of a sexual assault case.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan and all of their top officials remain in their jobs despite turning a blind eye to sexual misconduct complaints in the military.





Dawe’s offence is that he wrote a letter of reference for a subordinate convicted of sexual assault against another member of the Forces. The current command is taking a dim view of his actions and has put the general on paid leave while they consider the situation.

It is a sign the military brass is taking the issue of sexual misconduct of any type much more seriously.

Too bad that isn’t happening with the political bosses the military reports to.

Trudeau and Sajjan continue to say that they did nothing wrong in handling sexual misconduct allegations against Jonathan Vance in 2018. The truth is, they not only looked the other way, they extended the general’s contract and gave him a significant raise.


Trudeau said he knew there was a complaint against Vance at the time but didn’t know it was a “MeToo complaint.” Shockingly odd, given Trudeau’s chief of staff and his top political advisers were discussing the matter with top bureaucrats and using the term sexual harassment in emails about the matter.

Did Trudeau not know or did they not want him to know?

We know that at the time of the Vance issue being discussed in the PMO there was already concern that someone would break the story of Trudeau’s Kokanee grope. As the CBC acknowledged in 2018, they knew of the story and had contacted the woman Trudeau manhandled but she declined to comment and didn’t want anything more to do with the story.




Trudeau had gone on the record, in a television interview with the CBC’s Chris Hall, in late January 2018 to say he was sure his past actions were all above board.

“There is no context in which someone doesn’t have responsibility for things they’ve done in the past,” Trudeau told Hall while saying that standard must apply to all, including him as PM.

“As you look back at your own career, is there a chance at some point that your actions might not have been construed as they were intended?” Hall asked.

“I don’t think so. I’ve been very, very careful all my life,” Trudeau said.

Months later, he would be apologizing again for the Kokanee grope while also saying the woman had experienced things differently.

“I don’t remember any negative interactions that day at all,” Trudeau said in July 2018.


Either he's a out and out liar or he's just incompetent.......

I'm sure the TruAnon crowd will chime in with the requisite Orange man diatribe though.
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,804
2,264
113
Trudeau will keep using the coverup strategy until it doesn't work. With our bought and paid for media, that may never happen.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,716
17,562
113
I love that nobody can actually say what they think he's done wrong this time.
Only that he really did something really, really bad this time.
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
69,896
68,400
113
It's the usual Sun mud slinging against Justin and the Grits. It doesn't have to make sense and usually doesn't.

But from what I can make out....... (and I'm guessing)...... A general gave a reference to a subordinate who had been convicted - according to the Sun - of a sexual assault. And Justin was supposed to have done something or other, but didn't. And then the military suspended the general for being a dick. And Justin was supposed to have done something or other, but didn't. And also something-something-something.

Result of all this - ANOTHER LIBERAL MAJORITY GOVERNMENT WHEN THE NEXT ELECTION HAPPENS.

1204fa.jpg
 

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
6,804
2,264
113
Looks like Unsure is giving Justin a run for his money! Prime Minister Unsure!
 

contact

Well-known member
Aug 1, 2012
3,629
988
113
polls are not a measure of innocence, understanding of and obeying ethics or honesty. this government repeatedly shuts down committees that are investigating it why? what are they hiding? so much for the most open and transparent government (Trudeau is the ONLY PM to have been found guilty of ethics violations not once but TWICE)

I'm sure the liberal supporters will make some excuse for that
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,331
5,556
113
polls are not a measure of innocence, understanding of and obeying ethics or honesty. this government repeatedly shuts down committees that are investigating it why? what are they hiding? so much for the most open and transparent government (Trudeau is the ONLY PM to have been found guilty of ethics violations not once but TWICE)

I'm sure the liberal supporters will make some excuse for that
The Conflict of Interest Act came into effect in 2006. It has applied only to Trudeau and his Conservative predecessor, Stephen Harper.

However, there are other examples of prime ministers being sanctioned for impropriety, facing serious accusations of wrongdoing or, at the very least, being called to explain their actions.

"We have had prime ministers whose dealings with private interests have proven exceedingly costly to their reputations and to the parties they led," Atkinson said.

Here's a look at some of those cases, in chronological order:

The Pacific Scandal -- John A. Macdonald's Conservative government was rocked by allegations that wealthy Montrealer Hugh Allan had been promised a contract to build a cross-country railway in exchange for more than $350,000 in political donations. Macdonald professed innocence, but he resigned as prime minister in 1873.

Schreiber Affair -- A federal inquiry led by Justice Jeffrey Oliphant found in 2010 that it was inappropriate for former prime minister Brian Mulroney, after leaving office, to accept cash-stuffed envelopes from German-Canadian businessman Karlheinz Schreiber. Oliphant said Mulroney "failed to live up to the standard of conduct that he himself adopted in the 1985 ethics code" for ministers, parliamentary secretaries and other senior public office holders.

Shawinigate -- Jean Chretien was dogged by accusations in the 1990s of inappropriately using his influence to seek financing from the Federal Business Development Bank on behalf of Yvon Duhaime, owner of the Auberge Grand Mere hotel. At the time, Chretien was part-owner of an adjacent golf course, despite an attempt to sell his shares.

Contempt case -- In March 2011, the Speaker of the House of Commons chastised Stephen Harper's Conservative government for withholding the full costs of anti-crime measures, corporate tax cuts and a planned fighter jet purchase. It led to the government's defeat on a non-confidence motion declaring the government in contempt of Parliament.

So in other words what occurred under previous administrations were equally bad or worse!!
 

contact

Well-known member
Aug 1, 2012
3,629
988
113

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,331
5,556
113
What the fact that Justin Trudeau and the liberals shut down every single committee investigating them
What do you think that harper did with the Mulroney bribery investigation?

Also:

 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,716
17,562
113
What do you think that harper did with the Mulroney bribery investigation?

Also:

Its going to be hard to match Mulroney and his hotel room meetings with paper bags filled with cash.
Very Trumpian.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gcostanza

gcostanza

Well-known member
Jul 24, 2010
7,818
527
113
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts