See once again you cannot even accept the study that compares LIKE with LIKE and proved that masking mandates were effective against the spread of the virus.Florida has a MUCH larger population of old people, of course they were gonna have a lot more infections and deaths.
And you are cherry-picking one State, and conveniently ignoring all the other US States that didnt have higher infection rates, even though they had no mask mandate
Again, you have to look at the entire country and not 72 school districts in the greater Boston area.
You guys have lost this debate. Why cant you just admit you are wrong??
This is the most recent study and of course instead you are cherry picking with States that have a rural population that would definitely have less of an infection rate as compared to the more congested states. You have definitely lost the debate like in the previous debates you will just go on and on!!
Tell us why Ontario and Quebec have higher infection numbers than the more rural provinces? We know that cities like Toronto and Montreal that are heavily populated will of course have higher infection rates, than Manitoba and Saskatchewan. But when Ontario and Quebec imposed the restrictions provinces like Alberta and Saskatchewan were the ones to start shipping their ICU needing patients to other provinces, as they did not impose the restrictions until very late in the game!!
By the way 19% of Canadians are over 65 whereas in Florida it is just around 22%. So not that huge a difference to justify having more than double the infection and death numbers as compared to the whole of Canada. Once again you have lost the debate!!