Lol.Yes booboo. We will. Sorry that makes you so upset. You may not take it, which is fine but we will see one in the future at some point.
k
Lol.Yes booboo. We will. Sorry that makes you so upset. You may not take it, which is fine but we will see one in the future at some point.
Well have fun in the intervention group then. I'll stay in the control thank you.There are no absolute facts in science. This is what your type do not get. Every medication has it's drawbacks.
If you get cancer will you get on a chemotherapy treatment? You will because you want to live. But the medication might kill you before it can cure you.
Same fucking thing with covid. Except covid vaccine might very well prevent from getting sick. So fuck yeah I will take it.
Never going to happen.Yes with a yearly shot.
Now your dissing a Paleo diet?.......LOL.....How's your impossible burger taste?I feel like I only ever heard it presented as a ‘hopefully,”’ statement by Tam and Trudeau. I don’t think Ford and his cronies were any more or less clear that herd immunity is conceptual.
Trudeau certainly dangled “75%” as a possible threshold for lifting restrictions in the 2nd quarter of last year. That was dismissed as it became clear that places like Israel and UK weren’t seeing evidence of herd immunity being achieved at those levels.
The only people that seem really miffed by this are people whose brains are so brittle that they can’t process “evolving science” and the likes.
They probably also have MySpace accounts, flip phones and are on a Palio diet.
I know for a fack the vaccine protected millions from getting seriously sick or dying. So yeah I will continue to trust science to protect myself.Well have fun in the intervention group then. I'll stay in the control thank you.
And we will see how this experiment of a mRNA vaccine ( gene therapy) works out.......
mRNA is not gene therapy Crazy to think some still believe that.
1)Based on your expertise/ advanced knowledge regarding viruses and epidemiology in general including herd immunity? (Please provide your educational qualifications)Herd immunity is impossible with this virus.
That's not how "herd immunity" works.These covid injection shots do absolutely nothing to contribute to herd immunity, THEY DO NOT BLOCK TRANSMISSION.
Doubt it will ever happen for Covid, it keeps changing it's colourThat's not how "herd immunity" works.
Not designed to alter your genes... https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid-mrna-gene-idUSL1N2PH16NmRNA therapy: A new form of gene medicine
It has been several weeks since I came back from Berlin. I was visiting the international mRNA health conference, where I presented our…medium.com
Hmmm........
Yup, 1-1/R nought is the "rule of thumb" level of non-susceptible people.Doubt it will ever happen for Covid, it keeps changing it's colour
The percentage of people who need to be immune in order to achieve herd immunity varies with each disease. For example, herd immunity against measles requires about 95% of a population to be vaccinated. The remaining 5% will be protected by the fact that measles will not spread among those who are vaccinated.
For polio, the threshold is about 80%. The proportion of the population that must be vaccinated against COVID-19 to begin inducing herd immunity is not known.
So the third dose is pretty good except some populations might need the forth which would not be picked up in studies of general populations.However, the vaccine did prove to provide moderate protection against symptomatic infection among young and healthy individuals in comparison to those inoculated three times.
“Among the approximate 600 participants, 270 of whom received either a fourth dose of the Pfizer vaccine or Moderna vaccine, we found no differences, both in terms of IgG antibody levels and in terms of neutralizing antibody levels, which reached a level similar to that measured a month after the third dose was administered,” said Prof. Gili Regev-Yochay, director of the Infection Prevention and Control Unit at Sheba Medical Center and head researcher of the study.
She also noted that in terms of the effectiveness of the fourth vaccine against infection – both of Pfizer and Moderna – they found that the infection rates among vaccinated individuals were only slightly lower than those in the control group.
“However, it should be emphasized that the third dose is extremely important for anyone who has not yet contracted COVID-19, and the fourth dose is most likely important for populations with risk factors for which a fourth vaccine would protect from serious illness.
The charade is over.Following up, here's a study that says the fourth vaccine doesn't do much. The Pfizer boss can't be happy with this study.
Fourth vaccine offers little protection against COVID-19 - study
Interim results released show that the vaccine offers little to no protection against the virus when compared to three doses.
The fourth coronavirus vaccine has shown to offer little protection against the coronavirus, a new study released by Sheba Medical Center has shown.
The study, published by The New England Journal of Medicine, examines the efficacy of the fourth coronavirus vaccine from Pfizer and Moderna. The interim results released show that the vaccine offers little to no protection against contracting the virus when compared to young and healthy individuals vaccinated with three doses.
However, the vaccine did prove to provide moderate protection against symptomatic infection among young and healthy individuals in comparison to those inoculated three times.
“Among the approximate 600 participants, 270 of whom received either a fourth dose of the Pfizer vaccine or Moderna vaccine, we found no differences, both in terms of IgG antibody levels and in terms of neutralizing antibody levels, which reached a level similar to that measured a month after the third dose was administered,” said Prof. Gili Regev-Yochay, director of the Infection Prevention and Control Unit at Sheba Medical Center and head researcher of the study.
She also noted that in terms of the effectiveness of the fourth vaccine against infection – both of Pfizer and Moderna – they found that the infection rates among vaccinated individuals were only slightly lower than those in the control group.
“However, it should be emphasized that the third dose is extremely important for anyone who has not yet contracted COVID-19, and the fourth dose is most likely important for populations with risk factors for which a fourth vaccine would protect from serious illness.
“This study is added to a series of studies led by Sheba with the aim of providing a scientific basis for managing a pandemic that has wreaked havoc around the globe,” concluded Regev-Yochay.
“Thanks to the cohort at Sheba and the plethora of data we have accumulated since the beginning of the pandemic, we continue to lead international studies which shed light on the behavior of the virus and the effectiveness of vaccines and serve decision makers in determining health policy in Israel and around the world.”
Fourth vaccine offers little protection against COVID-19 - study
Interim results released show that the vaccine offers little to no protection against the virus when compared to three doses.www.jpost.com
Not designed to alter your genes... https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-covid-mrna-gene-idUSL1N2PH16N
The smart people buy shares in profitable companies. I guess that that doesn't include you...They need to please their shareholders with billions more in profits.
So we need a booster once a year. Combo shots have been around for many years. MMR and Tdap immediately come to mind.They are going to come out with a COVID/flu shot combo. Watch. I have been saying this from the beginning. It will be a couple years but it will happen. We will need a booster every winter like the flu so may as well make it a combo shot. LOL
It will be interesting to see, but I believe that faced with cancer, the anti-mRNA crowd will gladly seek the treatment if it's effective. Or will they refuse it? Telling the doctor it's gene therapy and they have numerous Facebook and YouTube videos to prove it!I know for a fact the vaccine protected millions from getting seriously sick or dying. So yeah I will continue to trust science to protect myself.
mRNA is not gene therapy Crazy to think some still believe that. By the way mRNA is a few years away to a vaccine against oncology based cancer. This is huge. No chemo! Affected by cancer there will be no more anti-vax believe me.
2 vaccines are currently being research of upmost importance.The smart people buy shares in profitable companies. I guess that that doesn't include you...
So we need a booster once a year. Combo shots have been around for many years. MMR and Tdap immediately come to mind.
It will be interesting to see, but I believe that faced with cancer, the anti-mRNA crowd will gladly seek the treatment if it's effective. Or will they refuse it?
Some have said if asked if they would take a cancer vaccine would say no.- mRNA cancer vaccine
If they succeed it will change cancer treatment for many type of cancer. Big breakthrough. Imagine beating cancer without chemo!