Dream Spa

Municipal Speed Cameras Now Banned in Ontario

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
30,327
8,334
113
Makes sense why Dougie Boy banned these speed cameras:

Vehicles registered to Ford cabinet ministers caught by speed cameras more than 20 times

On May 1 last year, a vehicle registered to one of Doug Ford’s cabinet ministers blew past an automated speed camera, going 70 km/h in a 40 zone and netting a $450 fine.

Less than three weeks later, another vehicle registered to a cabinet minister was snapped going 65 km/h in a 40 zone and given a $227.50 ticket. Two months after that, another ticket, this time $110 for driving at 57 in a 40.

Those three offences in 2024 weren’t the only examples.

In fact, documents obtained by Global News using freedom of information laws reveal that, over three years, vehicles registered to Ford’s cabinet minister received more than $3,300 in fines for speeding.

The figure represents the cost of 23 tickets handed out by speed cameras, which the province said ministers or staff have since repaid.

The fastest speed the vehicles were recorded going was 30 km/h over the limit, and the lowest speed was 11 km/h over the limit. On average, the government vehicles were snapped 17 km/h above the limit, with the average cost of the tickets $144.

The data comes from a request Global News made earlier this year for all automated speed enforcement tickets issued to vehicles registered to any of Ford’s 36 cabinet ministers.

The resulting documents, released by freedom of information officials, redact the first name, last name and ministry of the vehicles that received speeding tickets. That means the 23 tickets were given to the vehicles of cabinet ministers, though it is not clear which ministries or who was driving at the time.

Many senior politicians are driven by staff, and their vehicles are sometimes used by staff without them being inside.

The premier’s office declined to release the names of the ministers or ministries which received the tickets. They did not address questions asking when they became aware of the tickets or whether they had taken any steps to work out who was driving at the time.

“Any ticket or fine issued to a Minister’s vehicle has been paid personally out of pocket by the Minister or staff member directly,” a spokesperson said.

“We expect all government vehicles, operated by staff and/or Ministers, to be driven in a manner that respects traffic laws and road safety.”

STORY CONTINUES BELOW ADVERTISEMENT

Two of the speeding tickets were issued in 2023, 11 in 2024 and 10 between January and May 2025.

Ford to remove speed cameras
Revelations about the number of speed camera tickets issued to government vehicles come as Ford rolls out his plan to end the use of automated speed enforcement in Ontario.

The premier and his transportation minister said last month they would table legislation to ban municipalities from operating speed cameras, a system Ford repeatedly referred to as a “tax grab.”

When the legislation is tabled, it will complete a policy walkback from the premier who introduced the regulations in 2019 that govern speed cameras in the first place, bringing into force a law written by the previous Liberal government.

A 2022 regulation also introduced by Ford’s government created the penalty structure for vehicles caught speeding. It decreed drivers would pay $5 per kilometre over the limit up to 19 km/h over, with higher penalties for going 20, 30 or 50 kilometres over.

The majority of the 23 tickets issued to minister vehicles fell into the lower category of $5 for each kilometre over the limit. Six of the 23 offences, however, were for driving more than 20 kilometres over the limit, which carries a fine of $7.5 per km/h, according to the rules Ford’s government tabled.

One vehicle travelling 30 km/h over the limit reached a fee of $12 per kilometre.

Ford has complained that the speed cameras are too sensitive, issuing tickets for minor infractions.

“I’ll use the stats just in Toronto because I know 32,000 tickets for going two kilometres over, four kilometres over, sometimes 10, 15 kilometres over — in three months,” the premier previously said.

None of the tickets given to minister vehicles were going less than 11 kilometres over the limit, and the average speed of 17 was also above Ford’s example.

Critics say Ford is creating speeding culture

Ontario Liberal MPP Rob Cerjanec, who has been advocating to keep the speed cameras in place, asked whether cabinet support to remove speed cameras was born from experience.

“It makes you wonder, who’s advocating to the premier to take speed cameras out of school zones,” he said.

“Could it be ministers? Could it be staff? Could it be his family? At the end of the day, school zones keep kids safe and they help bring down the speed in neighbourhoods.”

Cerjanec said whether it was cabinet ministers who were driving at the time the tickets were issued was immaterial, adding the “buck stops” with the minister.

“Accountability matters, transparency matters,” he said.

“Whether it is them driving or someone else, they’re (likely) in the vehicle. We’ve got to make sure that folks aren’t speeding all over the place, left, right and centre. Going 20, 30 over, that’s not OK.”


Dougie Boy HAS TO PROTECT HIS CRONIES from breaking the law!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter

Lenny59

Well-known member
May 25, 2023
794
896
93
Overburdened Ontario taxpayers escaping what is essentially another tax will be thankful. One thing Ford has done right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dvous11

Anbarandy

Bitter House****
Apr 27, 2006
11,308
3,983
113
Overburdened Ontario taxpayers escaping what is essentially another tax will be thankful. One thing Ford has done right.
Quite sure more than 90% of overburdened Ontario taxpayers were already "escaping what is essentially" not a tax, but a fine/penalty for breaking HTA laws.

How did these 90%'ers manage to evade the "cash grab", you may be puzzled into inquiring?

Pssst, it's a secret.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bver_hunter

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
30,327
8,334
113
Its unfair that people speeding in front of schools get taxed higher.
Obviously, Ford has just rushed through this bill without consideration for any other safety measures replacing these speed cameras. One of the few solutions are those annoying speed humps.
Councils are not going to install them right away:

“The premier promised to have mitigating devices ... before he rips out the speed cameras. Where are they?” said Chow at an unrelated news conference Wednesday. “As of mid-November, if that bill (becomes law), none of the kids are going be protected.”
“As of yet, our office hasn’t seen a plan to operationalize camera removals, or how a road safety infrastructure program might work to replace fine revenue used to make streets safer, or the other details discussed publicly by the province,” Shirven Rezvany, the mayor’s deputy chief of staff, said Thursday.
As for additional infrastructure to slow traffic, like roundabouts, speed bumps or cushions, not all school zones will be eligible for them because of where they are located — on main arterial roads in the city or streets where there are streetcar tracks, for example.
Even those roads that are eligible may have to wait at least a year and a half, with city staff adding that redesigning a road can take up to a decade.
(The city rotates 126 of its cameras that aren’t mounted to poles into school and other safety zones every few months to a year, based on data showing the areas with the most safety concerns.)
“The typical existing time frame for investigation for new ... speed humps and speed cushions is 12 months,” said city spokesperson Kate Lear. “Following community council approval, installation has a typical time frame of six to 16 months.”

If slowing traffic requires the redesigning of a road, that can take much longer — as much as five to 10 years. “Public consultation needs to inform the conceptual designs that are developed ... before delivery can be co-ordinated within the multi-year capital co-ordination process,” said Lear.
Roundabouts are largely out of the question in Toronto school zones given how much real estate they require, the city’s former general manager of transportation services told council earlier this month.
Warning signs will mean almost nothing to drivers if they are going to be in place long before any traffic-calming infrastructure can be installed, according to Sasha Gollish, a civil engineer and research associate at the University of Toronto whose expertise includes road safety.
Drivers’ compliance with warning signs often involves some cost-benefit analysis, she said, where they factor in the inconvenience of being late or their dislike of slowing down. That split-second decision usually favours not slowing down, she added.
“Drivers are trying to maximize their efficiency and minimize their time getting there,” Gollish said.
“It is going to take a child dying in a school zone for people to wake up and understand how important this issue really is.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frankfooter
Toronto Escorts