Kerry Picks Edwards

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,881
197
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Well it's official, Edwards should add some sorely needed polish on the ticket (I've heard some say this is a Kangaroo ticket, where the back legs are stronger than the front) and while he is unlikely to help the ticket carry his state he will fire up the class warfare (2 Americas).

OTB

Kerry Names Ex-Rival Edwards as Running Mate

By Patricia Wilson

PITTSBURGH (Reuters) - Democratic White House hopeful John Kerry (news - web sites) on Tuesday chose former political rival North Carolina Sen. John Edwards (news - web sites), a man with "guts and determination and political skills," as his vice presidential running mate.

The choice of Edwards, 51, once picked by People magazine as one of America's sexiest politicians, brings a dash of fresh-faced charismatic appeal to a ticket headed by Kerry, who has been criticized for his leaden campaign style.

As a Southerner, the Kerry campaign hoped Edwards can appeal to voters in parts of the country where the Massachusetts senator was running behind President Bush (news - web sites).

"I am pleased to announce, that with your help, the next vice president of the United States will be Senator John Edwards of North Carolina," Kerry told a rally in downtown Pittsburgh as a huge banner unfurled behind him that read, "Kerry-Edwards. A stronger America."

Kerry called Edwards, a first-term senator and millionaire trial lawyer, "a champion for middle class Americans." Although he won only one state during the Democratic primaries, Edwards received praise for his strong Populist campaign.

Edwards, who said in a statement he was "humbled by the offer -- and thrilled to accept it," was not at the rally with Kerry but will join him in Pittsburgh later. The two will campaign in the battleground state of Ohio on Wednesday.

"I have chosen a man who understands and defends the values of America, a man who has shown courage and conviction, ... a man who has shown guts, determination and political skills in his own race for the presidency," Kerry said.

Bush immediately welcomed Edwards to the campaign, saying: "The vice president (Dick Cheney (news - web sites)) called him early this morning ... to say that he welcomed him to the race, as do I. I look forward to a good, spirited contest."

REPUBLICANS ROLL OUT AD

The Bush re-election campaign wasted no time attacking the Democratic ticket. "Sen. Edwards delivers his pessimism with a Southern drawl and a smile, but his message of a divided America rings hollow with voters that know our country is united," said campaign spokesman Scott Stanzel.

The campaign also announced the release of a new television advertisement featuring what it said was Kerry's "first choice" as running mate, Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona. The Democrat courted his colleague and fellow Vietnam veteran for the job but was rebuffed.

Kerry and Edwards will be formally anointed later this month at the Democratic convention in Boston as the party's challengers to Republicans Bush and Cheney in the Nov. 2 election.

"I can't tell you how proud I am to have John Edwards on my team, or how eager I am for the day this fall when he stands up for our vision and goes toe-to-toe with Dick Cheney," Kerry said.

During his primary campaign against Kerry and other Democrats, Edwards stressed proposals aimed at helping working class Americans and made repeated references to the "two Americas" -- one for the wealthy and one for those struggling to get by.

Despite the secretive selection process, a few names, including those of Edwards, Missouri Rep. Richard Gephardt, Florida Sen. Bob Graham and Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack had percolated to the top of the list of potential running mates.

The roll-out of a running mate and the party conventions usually provide a candidate with big surges in the polls. Democratic National Committee (news - web sites) chairman Terry McAuliffe predicted Kerry would get a bump of between 8 and 12 percentage points.
 
Jan 24, 2004
1,279
0
0
The Vegetative State
I was pulling for John McCain. Great guy - shame about the whole Republican thing.

It's also a shame that moderate Republicans are holding party loyalty above what's best for the country.
 

mrpolarbear

New member
Sep 10, 2001
1,093
0
0
70
chicago
I think Edwards is an excellent choice. Us Dems have to do a better job in the south and i think this pick will do it. The only thing i am afraid of is Dubya gets in thru the back door again, if that happens again i say you can kiss the electorial college goodbye for sure. Anybody know where i can get a Kerry, Edwards bumper sticker today?
 

healer677

Dos XX at Senor Frogs
Jan 13, 2004
2,154
0
36
Playa Del Carmen Q.R.
I thought Gephart would have been the choice.

Some have mentioned that Edwards couldn't even carry his own state. As well, during the Democratic nomination run - Kerry took pot shots at Edwards about not being "presidential caliber" and he also illustrated the differences they had regarding policies.

Did Kerry pick him because he's a good earner (fund raiser) for the Democrats. I have to say though that I find Edwards more charismatic and much savvier than Kerry.
 

Dancerfan

Oldtimer
Dec 22, 2001
936
2
18
71
I follow US politics frequently and Id say that ticket should be the other way around,Edwards/Kerry!
 

healer677

Dos XX at Senor Frogs
Jan 13, 2004
2,154
0
36
Playa Del Carmen Q.R.
I always thought Gephart was more experienced. He had more Washington polish and clout, and he could win his own state in a primary.

But, I guess in politics; it doesn't hurt to be young and energetic - its a way of boosting up the ticket to younger voters.
 

ocean976124

Arrogant American Idiot
Oct 28, 2002
1,291
0
36
USA
I would have voted for Edwards over Bush but no way would I vote for Kerry over Bush (even with Edwards as the VP). Edwards "two Americas" speach isn't really class warfare, he's simply pointing out that some have been left behind and we need to address that (even Bush would have to admit as much)....
 

ocean976124

Arrogant American Idiot
Oct 28, 2002
1,291
0
36
USA
healer677 said:
I always thought Gephart was more experienced. He had more Washington polish and clout, and he could win his own state in a primary.

But, I guess in politics; it doesn't hurt to be young and energetic - its a way of boosting up the ticket to younger voters.
Actually its questionable if Gephart could have won his own state. He's not especially liked outside of his district. Not to mention he adds nothing to the ticket. Kerry is already pro-union and to the left on most issues and Gephart isn't really that much more charismatic than Kerry.
 

ocean976124

Arrogant American Idiot
Oct 28, 2002
1,291
0
36
USA
healer677 said:
I thought Gephart would have been the choice.

Some have mentioned that Edwards couldn't even carry his own state. As well, during the Democratic nomination run - Kerry took pot shots at Edwards about not being "presidential caliber" and he also illustrated the differences they had regarding policies.

Did Kerry pick him because he's a good earner (fund raiser) for the Democrats. I have to say though that I find Edwards more charismatic and much savvier than Kerry.
Kerry would have lost to Edwards in a one on one race. The Dems rushed to pick a candidate that they thought was "electable". Kerry came out on top in the first two primaries and that was it. What they failed to remember was that Bush won with a positive upbeat message against a dull and "I'm the smartest guy in the room" democrat. Kerry is Gore with a war record.
Edwards was the only Democrat candidate who spoke a positive message. An Edwards/Clarke ticket would have crushed Bush...
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,881
197
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
I think Kerry has the nomination (or more precisely will) because he's not Howard Dean. If he's elected president it will be because he's not George Bush. The guy just has no appeal himself.

OTB
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,881
197
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Re: The Edwards Pick

bbking said:
OTB I thought you would have seen the main reason for Kerry to pick Edwards - that it may force Bush and the Republicans to spend more money in the South than they wanted to.
The fact that Edwards rivals McCain as one of the two best stump speakers in America today is and added bonus and one won't be on the road all the time (McCain). The extra spending will also cause problems for the Republicans in Senate and Congressional races.
I don't know about your Kangaroo statement - polls indicate that Americans where very unsure about Edwards at the top of the ticket, but the overnights indicate Americans are very happy with this choice - even more so than the pick of Chenney 4 years ago.
This is a real good choice for the Dems as it fires up an already well motivated party.
The race will be won or lost in the Midwest (Michigan, Ohio, Penn.....) as the rest of the country is already blue or red. I would agree that Edwards is a good stump speaker. It's not hard to predict a bump in poll numbers followed by a long attack from the Republicans (a inexperienced trial lawyer should provide a lot of ammo for the attack machine).

OTB
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,881
197
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Re: Re: Re: The Edwards Pick

bbking said:
I agree with you on where it will be won or lost but spending more money in areas you already own will take spending away from needed contests. Look as for the attack by Republicans - I think the Dems have already learned this lesson - that it will do little good because it is a battle of each others base. What it will come down to is who's base stays home in the bigger numbers. Republicans already have big problems with their more radical supporters - Patriot Act, Deficit, the lack of progress on Company Frauds etc.,
Besides, as for attacks don't you think that the non-bidded contracts that Haliburton got for Iraq might make Cheney a wee bit vulnerable.
To make the Republicans spend money in the South they'd have to spend money/time there as well, which would be a waste of time. As for bases, I think this is the biggest Republican problem, the core hate Bushies will be out in force voting against him - a ham sandwich would have about the same chance as Kerry.

Will be fun to see how the debate goes.

I don't buy the tin-foil-hat Halliburton scandal, how many companies have those resources? How long does a bid take? How tied to Halliburton is Cheney CURRENTLY - tough answers to all those questions for those that think beyond the headlines.

OTB
 

ocean976124

Arrogant American Idiot
Oct 28, 2002
1,291
0
36
USA
Re: Re: Re: The Edwards Pick

bbking said:
Besides, as for attacks don't you think that the non-bidded contracts that Haliburton got for Iraq might make Cheney a wee bit vulnerable.
Only if someone didn't understand that Haliburton was one of the only companies that could have actually fulfulled those contracts in the first place....
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,881
197
63
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
Re: Re: Re: Re: The Edwards Pick

ocean976124 said:
Only if someone didn't understand that Haliburton was one of the only companies that could have actually fulfulled those contracts in the first place....
Too true. This election is not about Cheney, Edwards or for that matter Kerry, it's a referendum on Bush plain and simple. The economy is back and he will be in good shape this fall to run on that so the pivotal issue is Iraq. While many hate Bush and his Iraq policy I don't think you will see ANY difference in Iraq policy if Kerry is POTUS. Taxes will go up, domestic spending will go even higher but no difference on Iraq.

OTB
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts