Sorry to go off topic, or to seem to be defending Mike Harris, but every time somone comes out to blame the City of Toronto's woes on the Harris governement downloading the fiscal reponsibility of social services costs to the city, my mind hurts.
People tend to forget that at that time in 1998 the provinical government also uploaded (what at the time was the single biggest social expenditure for the City of Toronto) the cost of providing education services to all the municialites of Metro Toronto.
In reality the province fiscally helped the city with swaping out a lower cost burden to the City; but true to form Toronto went on its usual spending spree and is now paying the price.
I mean in 2010 the city of Toronto will spend at least $161 Million dollars on the homeless, where as the province will spend $2.61 Billion on the Toronto District School Board.
So truly the blame lies in the seats of 100 Queen Street West, ad many of those people are still in office happy to keep spending like crazy.
Too true... If Toronto had been run by sane administrators instead of clueless idealists Toronto would never hav problems of this magnitude...
As for the homeless... I wonder how much their expenditures break down per homeless person?? or per troubled urban youth... etc etc.... I'll bet that it is an insane per person amount on account of inefficiency & pissing away $$ of feelgood pet projects...
Wouldn't be too hard to have several downtown shelters with beds, bathrooms & food.. Like the capsule hotels in Japan... Somewhere safe, warm & clean with enough food.
Enough to house a reasonable amount of homeless at a bargain cost... No cigarettes... no tv... no nothing except for shelter, cleanliness & enough calories to live on... Humane warehousing. Anyone incapable of following the basic rules or who is a danger to the others is banned...
At all of them have some method of communicating betterment programs to the people... Those that take advantage are moved to the state of self sufficiency that their abilities will allow... From cleaning a section of city street for tv privileges & a wider food menu to their own room with a few amenities to a subsidized apartment & then onto independence.. At any stage they are treated with dignity & respect but their expectations are firmly set to match their ability & accomplishments. As long as someone is truly doing the best with what they have... They should be able to enjoy what they earn with pride..
A figure should be set as to the maximum sustainable # of homeless the City can financially provide for & then make a crime to habitually sleep on the streets or squat. Anyone in excess of the maximum # of beds or those that aren't civilized enough to use them are either referred to institutions, given tickets out of town or punished by jailtime or fines to be paid off by forced labour... Then they are banished. permanently with harsh punishments meted out to those who trespass again.
Homeless come here because there are too many incentives & not enough deterrents. Catering to them only pads social services payrolls & makes libtards Feel like they've done something...