C contact Well-known member Aug 1, 2012 3,629 988 113 May 29, 2021 #1 Court rules against using race, sex to allocate federal aid (msn.com)
J jcpro Well-known member Jan 31, 2014 24,673 6,840 113 May 29, 2021 #2 Duh! It's an actual amendment to the Constitution that explicitly prohibits such actions.
Valcazar Just a bundle of fucking sunshine Mar 27, 2014 32,708 60,734 113 May 29, 2021 #3 jcpro said: Duh! It's an actual amendment to the Constitution that explicitly prohibits such actions. Click to expand... Which one?
jcpro said: Duh! It's an actual amendment to the Constitution that explicitly prohibits such actions. Click to expand... Which one?
J jcpro Well-known member Jan 31, 2014 24,673 6,840 113 May 29, 2021 #4 Valcazar said: Which one? Click to expand... None of them- my mistake. It has been in the pipeline, but it hasn't been passed, yet. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 however is the law of the land and no judge would upset it. I don't think so, anyway.
Valcazar said: Which one? Click to expand... None of them- my mistake. It has been in the pipeline, but it hasn't been passed, yet. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 however is the law of the land and no judge would upset it. I don't think so, anyway.
A Anbarandy Bitter House**** Apr 27, 2006 10,863 3,433 113 May 29, 2021 #6 oldjones said: US Court. Nothing to see here. Click to expand... Yeah baby! Back in black. Welcome back.
oldjones said: US Court. Nothing to see here. Click to expand... Yeah baby! Back in black. Welcome back.