So if we are the victims you are......?A tweet from a professional victims group. What a "gotcha".
So if we are the victims you are......?A tweet from a professional victims group. What a "gotcha".
Stop your abusive lingo and if you cannot do so like some of the right wingers that got banned then you could head in the same direction If you cannot comprehend this simple fact then you are beyond redemption:Can't take an "L" gracefully, can you?
This is where actually knowing something about the subject you're trying to discuss, helps; it should prevent you from sounding like a fucking moron.
Let me say this again, since you didn't understand it the first time, you don't have to be licensed, registered gun owner to hunt or shoot in Canada. If they were young, when they "hunted and shot", there's a good chance they weren't licensed, because they were under the supervision of someone who was.
You're making an awful big deal and inference about a one-liner in an article, to try to defend your ignorant assertation when there is absolutely zero proof that they were licensed and registered gun owners. But even if they were, so what? Does that then discredit the other two million in Canada? There's a word for that, "discrimination".
But then again, that seems to be par for the course; focus on one the line that "proves" your point. ROTFLMAO.
Mr. Henry recalled that when they were around 15, the brothers — who came from a hunting family and were legal gun owners — started going to the gym. “They did some cadet training,” and were interested in military training. He said they “always dressed up in camo,” adding they “liked blowing stuff up. That was their big interest.” He said the brothers’ Instagram pages, which have been set to private, showcase photos of them in tactical gear.
Another ignorant comment!!A tweet from a professional victims group. What a "gotcha".
Keep reaching...Stop your abusive lingo and if you cannot do so like some of the right wingers that got banned then you could head in the same direction If you cannot comprehend this simple fact then you are beyond redemption:
Two brothers from Vancouver Island named as gunmen killed during botched bank robbery in Saanich, B.C.
The motive behind the armed robbery and subsequent exchange of gunfire with officers has not yet been determined, police saywww.theglobeandmail.com
The fact is that their family owned legal weapons and now they reached the age of 22. So those were legally bought weapons. Now just walk away with the tail between your legs!!
The original grifters; real credible.Another ignorant comment!!
You wanted the proof and now you cannot accept it. So now you are going in a tangent like the rest of the right wingers. Not surprising!!Keep reaching...
"This one exception proves the rule"
It's trains of thought like that, that lead to other discriminatory practices.
Lost cause. ROTFLMAO!!The original grifters; real credible.
It's not proof, it's a line in an article that doesn't even specifically state that these were guns that they purchased through legal channels. Which doesn't matter anyways, because they broke the law by attempting an armed robbery. Everything you're inferring is just that, speculation.You wanted the proof and now you cannot accept it. So now you are going in a tangent like the rest of the right wingers. Not surprising!!
Is the Illinois shooter, Crimo III, another 'exception'?Keep reaching...
"This one exception proves the rule"
It's trains of thought like that, that lead to other discriminatory practices.
I agree, they are. Heidi Rathjen is as much as a "survivor" as the janitor on duty that day; in that they were both in the building when the shooting happened. Now she gets to grift for the rest of her life.Lost cause. ROTFLMAO!!
I'd consider a outlier/minority an exception, that's kinda how these things are supposed to work; you know, math.Is the Illinois shooter, Crimo III, another 'exception'?
You have not proven that it is not so. If they used the legally bought weapons then that is what I stated in the first place and you could not accept that fact.It's not proof, it's a line in an article that doesn't even specifically state that these were guns that they purchased through legal channels. Which doesn't matter anyways, because they broke the law by attempting an armed robbery. Everything you're inferring is just that, speculation.
??????????????????????????????I agree, they are. Heidi Rathjen is as much as a "survivor" as the janitor on duty that day; in that they were both in the building when the shooting happened. Now she gets to grift for the rest of her life.
"Probably" isn't in the vocabulary of someone who has PROOF, which you still lack.You have not proven that it is not so. If they used the legally bought weapons then that is what I stated in the first place and you could not accept that fact.
They broke the law no matter what, as they attempted to rob a bank and did so but could not get away. Using these guns for this cause was illegal and then carrying out mass murders means they broke several laws. You are the one that was speculating that they were not legal gun owners when their family legally purchased the guns. Also one of the brother went on a military drill to try and enrol in the army but was rejected. So he probably also had a permit to use such guns!!
Look it up, Poly is a bunch of grifters and a much smaller group than licensed gun owners in Canada.??????????????????????????????
They come from a family of Legal Gun Owners. Period!! That is how they learned to use the guns for their far right extreme ideology."Probably" isn't in the vocabulary of someone who has PROOF, which you still lack.
If they were legally purchased, we would have heard it by now, because this government loves to disclose that information as quickly as they can. But like Portapique, we don't have the details. Wonder how long it will take them this time to make up a narrative that aligns with their agenda?
I know exactly who she is. But what does she have to do with these killings? Once again drifting at a tangent!!Look it up, Poly is a bunch of grifters and a much smaller group than licensed gun owners in Canada.
But you know what they say about the squeaky wheel...
WTF are you talking about, now you think you need a PAL to apply for the CF? Like I said earlier, it helps when you actually know something about the subject, instead of spewing bullshit.They come from a family of Legal Gun Owners. Period!! That is how they learned to use the guns for their far right extreme ideology.
Again one of them was in a military drill to try and enrol in the army but was rejected. He would have the permit to do so if he was in that drill.
See, how you once again are going at a tangent!!
Freely available? ROTFLMAO.I know exactly who she is. But what does she have to do with these killings? Once again drifting at a tangent!!
Again there should be tighter restrictions as these guns are freely available for such extremists to indulge in.
If their family did not train them in the first place, then maybe this whole mass killings might never have occurred!!