Toronto Escorts

Wuhan Lab just busted, 2 new videos. Bat lady and Daszak lied.

Nov 30, 2007
3,007
995
113
Please stop trying to spread your disinformation. I'm not saying the virus couldn't have come from a lab by accident, but there still remains no proof. Anyone who says they have concrete, irrefutable proof is probably lying. It could turn up, but I highly doubt it would come from someone's YouTube channel. There is still a strong chance the virus came from the wet market, but you can't rule out anything just yet.
I agree with your statement, but i still blame China for knowing about it and doing shit about it at the beginning. If they acted sooner instead of trying cover it up i dont think the world would be where it is right now.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
27,877
49,649
113
I agree with your statement, but i still blame China for knowing about it and doing shit about it at the beginning. If they acted sooner instead of trying cover it up i dont think the world would be where it is right now.
This is undeniably true. If China hadn't been obsessed with not admitting there was a problem, things would have gone better.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
27,877
49,649
113
Um....

So when a corona virus starts in Wuhan China, you don't think that there is a good chance the Wuhan Lab for Corona Virus Research might have something to do with it?
Not particularly, no. Labs are not the most common source of virus outbreaks. Is there a possibility it had something to do with it? Yes. But it being there doesn't make it a "good chance" it came from the lab.

That is a satisfying intuitive narrative, but that susceptibility to narrative makes people overstate the likelihood.

Trump is independent of this. The virus started in Wuhan. That is a fact now.
No it isn't. It was first detected in Wuhan. That isn't the same thing. There are still stray reports of possible COVID-19 infections predating the Wuhan outbreak. It is most likely that the first significant outbreak was in Wuhan and still quite likely that the first human infection was there, but neither is a fact. (We can't even confidently say it is the first we know of because some of those earlier cases haven't been fully investigated yet. Some have and have been ruled out but not all.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Male4Strapon

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,815
3,470
113
Not particularly, no. Labs are not the most common source of virus outbreaks. Is there a possibility it had something to do with it? Yes. But it being there doesn't make it a "good chance" it came from the lab.

That is a satisfying intuitive narrative, but that susceptibility to narrative makes people overstate the likelihood.



No it isn't. It was first detected in Wuhan. That isn't the same thing. There are still stray reports of possible COVID-19 infections predating the Wuhan outbreak. It is most likely that the first significant outbreak was in Wuhan and still quite likely that the first human infection was there, but neither is a fact. (We can't even confidently say it is the first we know of because some of those earlier cases haven't been fully investigated yet. Some have and have been ruled out but not all.)
Stupid semantics games. Thats what this is.

It started there.

Occam's Razor
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Stupid semantics games. Thats what this is.

It started there.

Occam's Razor
It couldn't possibly start there because, GASP!, that would make Trump correct and all the "experts " including Twitterverse, wrong. The consensus can never be exposed as wrong, hence all the spin and pretzel baking.
 

poker

Everyone's hero's, tell everyone's lies.
Jun 1, 2006
7,746
6,009
113
Niagara
The truth is... you will never know the truth. Never. You're too small. They're too big.
 
  • Like
Reactions: squeezer

lessjamie7

Well-known member
Mar 10, 2013
1,070
553
113
Not particularly, no. Labs are not the most common source of virus outbreaks. Is there a possibility it had something to do with it? Yes. But it being there doesn't make it a "good chance" it came from the lab.

That is a satisfying intuitive narrative, but that susceptibility to narrative makes people overstate the likelihood.



No it isn't. It was first detected in Wuhan. That isn't the same thing. There are still stray reports of possible COVID-19 infections predating the Wuhan outbreak. It is most likely that the first significant outbreak was in Wuhan and still quite likely that the first human infection was there, but neither is a fact. (We can't even confidently say it is the first we know of because some of those earlier cases haven't been fully investigated yet. Some have and have been ruled out but not all.)
I haven't seen a person yet who died from Covid, so until I do this outbreak really isn't a fact.

LJ
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
27,877
49,649
113
It started there.

Occam's Razor
Occam's razor suggests it is a natural outbreak.
You need to stop being in love with your narratives above all, it's what screws up your political thinking as well.
 

silentkisser

Master of Disaster
Jun 10, 2008
3,581
4,366
113
I agree with your statement, but i still blame China for knowing about it and doing shit about it at the beginning. If they acted sooner instead of trying cover it up i dont think the world would be where it is right now.
I have two thoughts on this: One, they thought they could cover it up and there would be no global spread. Not because of a lab leak (though that is possible), but because of it damaging China's reputation. They lose their shit if you make fun of Jinping...

The other, they didn't recognize how dangerous and easy-to-spread the disease was. Remember, it is new. Yes, it is similar to other corona viruses, but the didn't see it as being a serious threat. And by the time they did, it was too late. It had spread to Europe and other places.

Either way, their mismanagement of this is why 26K Canadians are dead and we've endured these lockdowns and what not for nearly a year and a half.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
27,877
49,649
113
I have two thoughts on this: One, they thought they could cover it up and there would be no global spread. Not because of a lab leak (though that is possible), but because of it damaging China's reputation. They lose their shit if you make fun of Jinping...

The other, they didn't recognize how dangerous and easy-to-spread the disease was. Remember, it is new. Yes, it is similar to other corona viruses, but the didn't see it as being a serious threat. And by the time they did, it was too late. It had spread to Europe and other places.

Either way, their mismanagement of this is why 26K Canadians are dead and we've endured these lockdowns and what not for nearly a year and a half.
I think the first more than the second, but a bit of both.

They probably underestimated it, but the compulsive need to cover it up because they should never look bad was the main driver.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
23,939
3,701
113

I've been saying for months that COVID 19 was created in a lab in Wuhan China. I have no doubt of this whatsoever.

My only question is, was it released by accident, or on purpose?
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
27,877
49,649
113
I've been saying for months that COVID 19 was created in a lab in Wuhan China. I have no doubt of this whatsoever.

My only question is, was it released by accident, or on purpose?
"Created" in what way? For what purpose?
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,815
3,470
113
"Created" in what way? For what purpose?
That what they do in these labs. Create and mutate viruses. To study them, research for vaccines. And yes biological weapon research.

Do I think I was released on purpose? Not at this point. Accidental via employees infected?

YUP.
 
Last edited:

toguy5252

Well-known member
Jun 22, 2009
15,971
6,110
113
I agree with your statement, but i still blame China for knowing about it and doing shit about it at the beginning. If they acted sooner instead of trying cover it up i dont think the world would be where it is right now.
What difference would that have made in the US. after the entire world new how dangerous it was and how quickly it was spreading the now former cry-baby in chief was telling the US that it would magically disappear. Regardless of where it began the now former epidemiologist in chief is directly responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people.
 

Valcazar

Just a bundle of fucking sunshine
Mar 27, 2014
27,877
49,649
113
That what they do in these labs. Create and mutate viruses. To study them, research for vaccines. And yes biological weapon research.

Do I think I was released on purpose? Not at this point. Accidental via employees infected?

YUP.
I was asking jamestkirk in this case.
You've been fairly consistent that you think it is an accidental escape of a virus that was made more lethal/infectious through gain of function research of some kind.
(Presumably to test a vaccine?)

What difference would that have made in the US. after the entire world new how dangerous it was and how quickly it was spreading the now former cry-baby in chief was telling the US that it would magically disappear. Regardless of where it began the now former epidemiologist in chief is directly responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people.
There would have been value in earlier cooperative response. That said, most of the failure of response from other countries wasn't dependent on China.
 
Toronto Escorts