Colonialism In The Middle East
- Thread starter shack
- Start date
I posted an article. Neither you nor Kautilya have refuted the substance of the article.
Why refute a racist attack on Muslims?
Its better just to identify it as what it is and move on.
I know that without that racism you have nothing, but we know that already.
Israel owns the colonialism label, you can't do anything about that.
shack said:
I posted an article. Neither you nor Kautilya have refuted the substance of the article.
I posted an article. Neither you nor Kautilya have refuted the substance of the article.
Like I said, you are unable to refute what you claim is false. As such, the article stands as being factual. Modern Islam in on a world wide quest of colonialism. No other religion can compare to a religion that still operates with a Medieval mentality.
Thank you for summing up both yours and that article's Islamaphobia.
If you want to talk colonialism you need to start with the country that funds 'settlers' to take foreign land and call it 'settlements'.
Considering these two lie about as much as Trump at least when it comes to this issue, do you expect any better.
A bit like expecting a cat to stay off the kitchen counter when you prepare the master's food. Cats gonna cat and pro genocide pro terrorist liars gonna lie.
ALso, facts, logic, what are you some sort of gay nazi communist? Sheesh.
There is no lying, doc.
You just won't accept the truth.
I did, you clearly think this article somehow will convince other people that Israel isn't a settler colonial state.
Its a stupid claim.
This is colonialism in action.
This is what you defend here.
You don't need to spew BS to counter someone else's BS. Do I really need to tell you the history of Pakistan and Bangladesh?
Exactly how and why did Pakistan come into being? Do tell. If Israel is an ethnostate, so is Pakistan.
Is that the only way to create an ethnostate? The ethnic cleansers must come from outside?
I didn't claim they were colonizers. I claimed they were ethnostates.
No, it's just a coincidence that they drove out most of their non-Muslim population.
The question is NOT how a state became the entity that it is, it is simply what king of state it is. As such Pakistan qualifies as an ethno-state.
The US and Canada are both democracies, but they became so under different circumstances. That doesn't change the fact that they're both democracies.
Only if you are the one who makes the definitions.
From the Oxford Dectionary
ethnostate
/ˈeTHnōˌstāt/
noun
- a sovereign state of which citizenship is restricted to members of a particular racial or ethnic group.
Then why do you have the reputation of being the biggest liar on TERB?
Why don't you start a poll asking who lies the most? Guaranteed it would be a runaway.
An ethno-state is determined by its' current status, not how it became that way.
Kautilya said:
Also I just read, that non-Jews who naturalize in Israel and become citizens are required to renounce their citizenship in other countries. But this is not a requirement for Jews. This one rule for Jews another, for other people, is the definition of an ethnostate.
This is your original definition which is nothing close to the Oxford definition. Pretzel.
