yawn
what did you expect to happen
your blithering damn fool challenge was met, but you did not like it so you dismissed it
you are not very bright
The future of housing? Your opinions
- Thread starter SchlongConery
- Start date
your blithering damn fool challenge was met, but you did not like it so you dismissed it
you are not very bright
Can't speak on the other countries, but in Canada we have too much of our economy tied into real estate. It's just going to be a mess as it's been since early the 2000.
Japan isn't stupid. They understand the "solution" only brings more problems.
what part of its not going to happen are you having trouble understanding ?
a 10 to 20% increase in output might be achieved, unfortunately a sustained 152% increase is required
just like you would keep the flooding taps open, any incremental immigration will just make the crisis worse
the 20 to 30 year old's who do not want to raise their families in their parents basement
so Who said in 7 years immigration needs to be resumed ?
you are not very bright
your challenge was idiotic and comical
all you have proven is you do not understand economics and that you will dogmatically stick to open doors immigration no matter what undisputable evidence is put in front of you
you are not very bright
its not my fault you ignore undisputable facts
what part of its not going to happen are you having trouble understanding ?
i think the same. I feel their program to buy cheap houses on a tourist visa is a trap. Or maybe their goalis to bring back home many japanese of origin living abroad who may not find life so fun anymore in america.
You're wasting your breath. His home country got so fucked with overpopulation, that he left to come here.
And now he wants to repeat the same mistakes here.
being home sick for millions crammed into a square kilometer is no reason to force that nightmare on Canada
Why did you move here? Why have a million moved from India to Canada? How many Canadians have moved to India?
What are the push and pull factors that drive emigration/immigration?
Population has everything to do with it. You need a population that is sustainable.
I've already told you I'm from the same country as you. I'm not trying to recreate it here.
You make a lot of assumptions about my religion and nationality. All wrong.
That doesn't mean we have to rapidly increase immigration levels. We've discussed this before.
250K a year was reasonable. 1M a year is not. We don't have to choose one extreme or another.
Either shut the doors completely, or else open the floodgates. This is a false dichotomy.
i guess not
Immigration destinations provide the opportunity to make money
Immigration destinations provide the opportunity for a better standard of living
i think we are starting to see the root of your confusion with so much
we do not have the housing capacity or the infrastructure (health care, transportation etc) to support a similar population density to India or Pakistan.
no sane person in Canada wants a similar population density to India or Pakistan.
lack of sanitation
poor access to clean drinking water
malnutrition
low productivity
lack of access to reliable affordable energy
lack of access to education
religious/ cultural backwardness (Afghanistan)
high child mortality
lack of access to medical care
corrupt government officials
civil wars
no investment
lack of arable land (the hillbillies in appalachia likely have a low population density, nobody is in a hurry to emulate them)
ugly women might also adversely impact birth rates - there is a cure for this one = alcohol
Last edited:
which is why we
however
BNN Bloomberg – Canada Business News, TSX Today & Interest Rates
Get the latest Canadian business news, TSX updates, interest rates and Bank of Canada coverage. Explore stock market investing and get expert financial insights on investment portfolio strategies.
www.bnnbloomberg.ca
time to hit the breaks on immigration
that not what you said,
so you did not use common sense
reality is not your friend
a multitude of potential causes for low density populations proves nothing
targets are not reality
there will be an election and policy change
your concept of unreasonable is very unreasonable.
still want to steal rich folks money at 95 to 99% ?
I think they should go back to to high corporate tax rates. If both Nations did it, with the old tax incentive breaks for research, equipment upgrades, payroll and benefits to employees, it would limit the stupidity of "next quarter" myopic business thinking.
Trickle down doesn't work, trickle up does.
Unfortunately for the Canada, limiting immigration will choke the Canadian economy as there is a dire labour shortage which immigration backstops. Immigration and housing are not mutually exclusive, both must happening simultaneously which the government has already “figured out” but has no solution for. The current opposition has no solution neither.So lower our standards is the answer? Man thankfully not many people in Canada think like you my man. How about limit immigration into Canada until things are figured out?
Immigrants continue to do jobs that Canadians either cannot or will not do which is and more visually apparent in major centres across Canada and becoming more and more in smaller regional centres.
Can Canada “ wait until things are figured out” to limit immigration. The answer is obviously, no.
In 2023, immigrants brought in 22 billion dollars to Canada and did in the neighbourhood of 300, 000 jobs that Canadians either cannot or will not do, many primarily from India.
The Canada - India economic patch solution is something that the US, Western Europe, Japan and other nations with decreasing workforces have failed to do.
Last edited:
If they are such a net positive, why are living standards and overall wealth going down?
250K per year was the level for two decades before Trudeau came to power. And we didn't have the problems that we do now.
You need to commission a study? That 100 million target by 2100 that you tout is from McKinsey. They get paid for these studies. Not exactly unbiased.
Of course they're going to recommend increasing the population. It means more customers for them and their clients.
GDP goes up. Doesn't mean GDP per capita does. What about the standard of living? No one can afford a house. Healthcare wait times grow longer.
But what do you care?
you say that a lot when confronted with the facts of the matter
your concept of reasonable is very unreasonable.
still want to tax/ steal rich folks money at 95 to 99% ?
still favour state sponsor assassinations on Canadian soil ?
