All those reports have the wrong definition of apartheid.
If they selected a new name that includes their arbitrary criteria, it would carry more weight.
frank, if they had a new name, there would be less confusion and people like me would not be able to debate it.
I'm ready for you to do your chicken dance:
WHY ARE THEY AFRAID TO ASSIGN A NEW NAME FOR SOMETHING THAT HAS CLEAR DIFFERENCES TO WHAT HAPPENED IN S. AFRICA?
The unavoidable answer is that the word "apartheid" carries an inherent stigma of hate, prejudice and evil that you and the other Jew haters want to attach to Israel.
Using a new name would not carry that same cachet. Do you agree? That is the ONLY answer.