Asian Sexy Babe
Ashley Madison

New York Sun column (Harsanyi) - The Democrats' energy disaster

Moviefan-2

Court Jester
Oct 17, 2011
10,489
172
63
This is a great column that explains how the Biden administration's determination to kill the fossil fuel industry is driving the high price of gasoline.

--

The Democrats' energy disaster

By David Harsanyi

Democrats have spent decades warning that the United States must stop using the most efficient and affordable energy sources or it will be consumed by heat waves, fireballs and cataclysmic weather events.

Every flood, every hurricane — every natural event, really — is now blamed on climate change. We have burdened our children with an irrational dread over their future. Then again, many in The Cult of Malthus won’t even have children.

So, why, if we’re on the precipice of this apocalypse, if saving the planet trumps every other concern, is President Biden begging everyone to drill?

On the days Democrats aren’t blaming Vladimir Putin for rising gas prices (a cost the president not long ago argued was worth paying for “freedom”), they’re blaming oil companies for profiteering.

Wednesday, as the national average hit $5.014 (nearly $2 higher than last year), Mr. Biden sent letters to refining companies threatening to once again abuse his executive powers if they do not immediately alleviate high prices — a political appeal to the imaginary “greedflation.”

Mr. Biden, who promised a 100 percent “clean-energy economy” with “net-zero emissions” in a couple of decades, now demands energy companies, already at utilization rates above 90 percent, invest tens of billions more in new drilling infrastructure, when everyone knows that tomorrow, when prices recede, Democrats are going to go right back to passing laws and regulations that undercut their business.

Today, Democrats demand CEOs spend more; tomorrow, they will promise to “hold oil executives accountable” and drag them in front of congressional committees where they will be scolded by economically illiterate windbags.

That future is baked into today’s price. Because Democrats’ energy policy is a schizophrenic mess, oscillating from puerile to pernicious. You can’t spend decades working to undercut production and campaign on the promise of destroying an industry and then demand it turn on a dime when it’s politically convenient.

Democrats will argue that this is a unique emergency as prices have spiked to historic highs. Guess what? Energy prices will always be at historic highs when you create shortages, which is exactly what progressives have been advocating we do for years.

Virtually every left-wing energy proposal in the past two decades, if not longer, has been designed to create false scarcity, either through fabricated marketplaces and stringent regulations or by putting caps on production. This is what they wanted.

“No more drilling on federal lands,” Mr. Biden promised during the 2020 presidential campaign. “No more drilling, including offshore. No ability for the oil industry to continue to drill, period, ends, number one.” Not number two. Number one. “No more — no new fracking,” the president also said. Blue states across the country have either banned fracking or are in the process of banning fracking projects.

And, on the first day of his presidency, Mr. Biden rejoined the Paris Agreement — an accord he is now working hard to break — revoking permits for Keystone XL, a 1,700-mile pipeline that was going to carry approximately 800,000 barrels of oil a day into the United States (also baked into the price).

Mr. Biden signed a slew of executive orders prioritizing climate change over energy production, halting oil and natural gas leases on all public lands. When a court blocked him, the Biden administration appealed the decision, even as indications of an energy spike were clear.

Rather than threatening price controls, the president should just rescind all his executive orders.

Of course, until some new technology is devised, implementing any policy that resembles the Green New Deal — the plan Biden says is the “framework” for his own efforts on “environmental justice” — would hold approximately the same economic consequences as having coronavirus economic shutdowns for 30 years straight.

That’s merely if we followed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recommendations on carbon emissions. Last year, with inflation already looming, Mr. Biden preached that it was a “moral imperative” to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent from 2005 levels by 2030 and 100 percent by 2050. That’s a policy that will have us fondly reminiscing about $5.00 a gallon.

Energy policy can’t be capriciously implemented and then abandoned every time the Democrats’ poll numbers flail. This is just a little taste of the Green New Deal. There is no sentient being that could accept the notion that Democrats are the party that is in favor of abundant fossil fuels. Hopefully, the price — even in small measure — for their green policies is so politically severe that they will moderate. Because we all have unattainable dreams.

 

ottawa_cuck

Well-known member
Feb 1, 2020
854
320
63
If the government pays 💯 for my solar panels I’m down with green energy. But I’ll still keep my hydro account for the cloudy days.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,399
23,785
113
You claim Biden's policy is slowing production but your article says this:

So, why, if we’re on the precipice of this apocalypse, if saving the planet trumps every other concern, is President Biden begging everyone to drill?
Can't keep their story straight, can they?
 

Moviefan-2

Court Jester
Oct 17, 2011
10,489
172
63
You claim Biden's policy is slowing production but your article says this:



Can't keep their story straight, can they?
I become more convinced every day that all you're doing is trolling.

In this case, your mindless reaction erroneously attributes the contradiction to inconsistency by the columnist. In fact, the contradiction points to the Biden administration's duplicity.

Biden used to boast about how he was going to end subsidies for fossil fuels and ban new drilling on federal lands. He only changed his tune when the escalating gas prices contributed to his collapse in the polls.

 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnLarue

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,399
23,785
113
I become more convinced every day that all you're doing is trolling.

In this case, your mindless reaction erroneously attributes the contradiction to inconsistency by the columnist. In fact, the contradiction points to the Biden administration's duplicity.

Biden used to boast about how he was going to end subsidies for fossil fuels and ban new drilling on federal lands. He only changed his tune when the escalating gas prices contributed to his collapse in the polls.

You don't understand the difference between long and short term, do you?
 

Moviefan-2

Court Jester
Oct 17, 2011
10,489
172
63
You don't understand the difference between long and short term, do you?
I see. So the existential threat from climate change isn't really all that urgent, after all.

I think the real issue is you don't understand the meaning of duplicity. It is absurd for the president to complain that companies aren't making long-term investments in an industry he has vowed to kill.

In fact, climate zealot Michael Mann says Congress must pass legislation this term to begin defunding the infrastructure for fossil fuels.


That's hardly the kind of thinking that promotes long-term investments. 😃
 

Charlie_

Well-known member
May 6, 2022
993
1,452
113
Climate change is a long-term problem.

Being able to afford gas to put in our vehicles is a short-term problem.

So, Biden's current solution is: Drill, baby, drill! Nice!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moviefan-2

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,399
23,785
113
I see. So the existential threat from climate change isn't really all that urgent, after all.

I think the real issue is you don't understand the meaning of duplicity. It is absurd for the president to complain that companies aren't making long-term investments in an industry he has vowed to kill.

In fact, climate zealot Michael Mann says Congress must pass legislation this term to begin defunding the infrastructure for fossil fuels.


That's hardly the kind of thinking that promotes long-term investments. 😃
You still don't understand the difference between long term and short term.
Short term you keep using fossil fuels while you are building the transition to renewables.

Some days I wonder how you manage to think you understand anything at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shakenbake

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,087
2,584
113
Climate change is a long-term problem.
It sure is a long term problem, since climate has been changing since the planet was formed, and all living things have been adapting/evolving as a response.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,668
6,839
113
Climate change is a long-term problem.

Being able to afford gas to put in our vehicles is a short-term problem.

So, Biden's current solution is: Drill, baby, drill! Nice!
The "principles " fly right out of the window and with a swift kick when the spot at the trough is on the line. Besides, anyone who followed-even sporadically- Joe's career in politics knows that he is "flexible ".
 

Moviefan-2

Court Jester
Oct 17, 2011
10,489
172
63
Short term you keep using fossil fuels while you are building the transition to renewables.
UN secretary general António Guterres:

“Nothing could be more clear or present than the danger of fossil fuel expansion. Even in the short-term, fossil fuels don’t make political or economic sense.”


So, "building the transition to renewals" means doing things in the short term that "don't make political or economic sense."

😀
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
14,008
2,255
113
Ghawar
Climate change is a long-term problem.
Climate change has been and will remain a long term problem
until climate leaders stop setting long term emission target to
sucker gullible climate sheeple.

Being able to afford gas to put in our vehicles is a short-term problem.

So, Biden's current solution is: Drill, baby, drill! Nice!
Gas affordability will continue to be a short-term problem into the
long term until there is no more affordable gas left in the ground.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charlie_

Dutch Oven

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2019
7,087
2,584
113
Gas affordability will continue to be a short-term problem into the
long term until there is no more affordable gas left in the ground.
Are you assuming another energy source will never be developed, or won't be developed before (affordable) oil and gas reserves are depleted? There is more oil in the ground in known reserves than has ever been extracted. Surely better technologies will develop to more fully extract existing deposits (nevermind discovery of further reserves)?

Considering the current supply that' still in the ground, you seem to be predicting a rather long period where no technological ingenuity will occur.
 

Charlie_

Well-known member
May 6, 2022
993
1,452
113
Are you assuming another energy source will never be developed, or won't be developed before (affordable) oil and gas reserves are depleted? There is more oil in the ground in known reserves than has ever been extracted. Surely better technologies will develop to more fully extract existing deposits (nevermind discovery of further reserves)?

Considering the current supply that' still in the ground, you seem to be predicting a rather long period where no technological ingenuity will occur.
I remember attending a class in high school, discussing fossil fuels, in 1977. At the time, there was estimated to be 300 years of coal left. One kid commented: "I'm sure we'll find an alternative in the future". Well, in 2022, we are not even close. However, if we want zero emissions, nuclear energy is a solution, although there's a small risk of radiation leaks and disasters.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
14,008
2,255
113
Ghawar
Gas affordability will still remain a short-term problem in the long
run if you count on technological ingenuity to bring gas prices down
in the future. Nuclear breeder reactor technology could eventually enable
an electrified global energy infrastructure running on earth's remaining
uranium reserves for another millennium. World leaders under the influence
of climate change lunatics must smarten up to allocate all the resources
available to global energy transition in the right direction or we will all
be doomed.
 
Last edited:

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
94,399
23,785
113
It sure is a long term problem, since climate has been changing since the planet was formed, and all living things have been adapting/evolving as a response.
So now you're arguing for adaptation like the dinosaurs adapted?
So clever.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts