Another of Trumpโs conspiracy theories has been debunked by his own DOJ.
What a fucking loser.
Nah, he's just going to fire the rest of the DOJ and hire Roger Stone, Guiliani, Eric and Don Jr to run a new investigation.Bill Barr will reinvestigate and then lie about it w a "secret" document that hell release in october to help trump.
Hahaha.The problem is twofold.
What is the criteria they consider proper.
And that it's secret court.
72% of righties don't trust the media, 22% of dems in the US don't.Hahaha.
You are so predictable.
Nothing, nada, zilch will ever satisfy that mind of yours.
So you are on side with a secret court created under the Bush Administration?Hahaha.
You are so predictable.
Nothing, nada, zilch will ever satisfy that mind of yours.
I'm on the side of "you need to be under the care of....."So you are on side with a secret court created under the Bush Administration?
Lol. That's right there is your hypocrisy and partisanship in action. I ask what is the criteria for secret warrants due to right wing legislation. And you can't answer. You duck and cover because you will give up any principles for a political agenda.I'm on the side of "you need to be under the care of....."
Maybe if Project Veritas looks into it B1000 will be satisfied? He seems to trust their reporting.Hahaha.
You are so predictable.
Nothing, nada, zilch will ever satisfy that mind of yours.
Post a link showing the actual criteria and who made the determinations.Maybe if Project Veritas looks into it B1000 will be satisfied? He seems to trust their reporting.
How's Trump doing with fixing that deep state thingy?Post a link showing the actual criteria and who made the determinations.
All we have now is assurance from the same types who said WMD existed in Iraq.
Why donโt you ask Project Veritas?Post a link showing the actual criteria and who made the determinations.
All we have now is assurance from the same types who said WMD existed in Iraq.
Exactly, as Barr under Trump is making those types of actions much more invasive and with less oversight.Butler is right that the FISA court is a mess. It has been for years.
But the whole argument by the Trumpists was that this was an abuse of the FISA court. That it was an outrageous breach of protocol. It wasn't.
If Butler wanted to have an actual discussion of the problems with FISA, that would be cool. But, as with most things, this is just a tool to attack people attacking Trump. It isn't something he actually cares about, or he would pick a different case and not just shift
goal posts to a general disdain of FISA now that he can't sustain the pro-Trump narrative.
I've talked about the Fisa court issues before 2016. This is just another case of it's abuses.Butler is right that the FISA court is a mess. It has been for years.
But the whole argument by the Trumpists was that this was an abuse of the FISA court. That it was an outrageous breach of protocol. It wasn't.
If Butler wanted to have an actual discussion of the problems with FISA, that would be cool. But, as with most things, this is just a tool to attack people attacking Trump. It isn't something he actually cares about, or he would pick a different case and not just shift
goal posts to a general disdain of FISA now that he can't sustain the pro-Trump narrative.
It isn't that I don't think Russia put up propaganda. It's that I don't think it was effective. And I don't think there was"collusion".Good. We agree.
FISA needs serious reform.
Propping up bullshit "It was a Russia Hoax" narratives doesn't help that.
So cheating is fine as long as it isn't effective? Interesting.It isn't that I don't think Russia put up propaganda. It's that I don't think it was effective. And I don't think there was"collusion".
And if every intelligence agency in the world and every news Corp in the world couldn't find a smoking gun after years of trying I think I'm correct in that assessment.