^^^^ utter nonsenseHilarious!! Now, Fuji is claiming that when he talked about water vapour feedback "reducing" the temperature, he was referring to "warming."
Is there anyone other than Fuji who thinks the word "reducing" describes an increase?
Unbelievable.
(By the way, his B.S. claims that he picked up the "cooling" idiocy from my 2016 posts is absurd. Nothing was stated or implied by me that would have led to that scientifically illiterate conclusion. And Fuji initially tried to defend his man-made global "cooling" idiocy when he repeated it in June 2017 -- after I had mocked his claims.)
Meanwhile, let's deal with the word "if", that Fuji thinks is so important.
Although we know Fuji is full of crap, let's play along and accept the claim that he was only allowing for the possibility that water vapour feedback might be responsible for cooling the Earth's temperature.
That means Fuji has fully rejected the idea that the AGW hypothesis is supported by facts.
To repeat: The overwhelming majority of the warming in the computer model projections comes from water vapour feedback.
If you don't accept the premise about water vapour feedback greatly amplifying the warming from CO2, then you cannot believe that human emissions have been the primary driver of the warming that occurred (mostly in the last 20 years of the 20th century) since 1950.
Fuji insists he is open to the idea that water vapour feedback doesn't produce the kind of warming projected by the models. Indeed, using the word "if", he says it may not cause any warming at all and might actually be "reducing" the Earth's temperature.
Thus, Fuji has made it official -- he fully rejects the idea that the AGW hypothesis has been confirmed by the facts (yet another in Fuji's ongoing string of contradictions).
What sort of twisted dishonest bullshit are you spinning where me replying to YOUR claims about water vapor with a dismissive "if" can be turned into the load of bullshit you just posted.
And you know WHY you are lying and posting bullshit?
Because you haven't got anything else to post. You never had any valid answer to the fact--the proven fact--that 100% of scientists capable of getting their view on global warming published in a top journal support it. Every one.
We are not any longer debating this topic because it's no longer a theory or a hypothesis. Human caused global warming is now just an observed fact.
All your predictions were wrong. You claims that warming stopped were wrong. The theories advanced by the kooks you cited were disproven and global warming was definitively empirically observed.
So what else can you do but start inane debates by lying about what others wrote. You sure as hell don't have anything relevant to post!