Redbook Operators plead guilty to prostitution charges

MadonnaLove

Banned
Dec 1, 2012
1,976
11
0
GTA
SAN FRANCISCO — The two operators of MyRedBook.com and SFRedBook.com — the pair of escort websites that were seized by federal authorities in June — have both plead guilty to charges of facilitating prostitution over the Internet.

The guilty pleas represent the first two federal convictions for online operators who knowingly allowed prostitution over the Internet.

The website operators, Eric Omuro of Mountain View, Calif., and Annmarie Lanoce of Rocklin, Calif., both will be sentenced in late March at separate hearings.

Federal prosecutors said that Omuro and Lanoce were complicit with prostitution involvement, listing acronyms for sex acts in a "terms and acronyms" section of the site and offering menus of sexual services, hourly and nightly rates and customer reviews.

Prosecutors also pointed to VIP memberships that allowed customers "access to 'private forums' and heightened capabilities to search reviews of the prostitution services."

As part of the plea agreement, Omuro agreed to the forfeiture of the domain names MyRedBook.com and SFRedBook.com and more than $1.28 million in cash and property as proceeds and other property.

Twenty-four counts of money laundering were dropped against Omuro as part of the deal.

Both operators could face five years a piece for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(3)(A) and (b)(I)(1) — interstate and foreign travel in aid of racketeering enterprise — as well as 18 U.S.C. § 2 — aiding and abetting -- in violation of California Penal Code § 647(b).

The sites, prior to their seizures by the Justice Department and IRS, purportedly were used by more than 10,000 sex workers prior to June when the sites were taken off the Internet.
http://www.xbiz.com/news/189365
 

LeeHelm

New member
Apr 14, 2002
780
1
0
Wow I feel so much safer that these people ar off of the street. :Eek:

Hopefully it will be thrown out on first amendment issue. The government will need to prove that the site was actually used in prostitution and not just promote it.


I noticed that the IRS was involved. That is how they might get them. We had MPs around here for years. They could never get them on prostitution. Finally shut them down using tax laws.
 

Serpent

Active member
Jan 1, 2006
1,863
0
36
Wow.That was in San Francisco also, not exactly a conservative bastion of righteousness
They were busted by the Feds under federal statutes. Like C-36 if RCMP decides to investigate inter-province violation of that law.
 

Aardvark154

New member
Jan 19, 2006
53,768
3
0
To think that the FBI could instead have spent this type of manpower on the idiots who shut down X-Box for millions of children over Christmas!
 

colt

Member
Mar 26, 2002
334
0
16
53
They were busted by the Feds under federal statutes. Like C-36 if RCMP decides to investigate inter-province violation of that law.
There are no "provincial" criminal statutes in Canada. There is one criminal code and it is a federal statute. Enforcement of the Criminal Code is a provincial responsibility. The RCMP's jurisdiction is not limited in the same fashion the FBI's is. In provinces like Ontario, which has a provincial police service, the RCMP's role is generally focused on things like organized crime - but that is an allocation of resources issue, not a jurisdiction issue.
 

AK-47

Armed to the tits
Mar 6, 2009
6,697
1
0
In the 6
MyRedBook.com and SFRedBook.com
Why didnt they just host their domains overseas in a country with legal prostitution laws??

Also, I wonder how jailtime they'll get. Knowing the US they'll probably get 20 years or so :rolleyes:
 

Jasmine Raine

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
4,046
49
48
It was not just the site but the money being made off the site that was not being reported.

Twenty-four counts of money laundering as well as violating 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(3)(A) and (b)(I)(1) — interstate and foreign travel in aid of racketeering enterprise — and 18 U.S.C. § 2 — aiding and abetting -- in violation of California Penal Code § 647(b).

If they didn't get them on one of those charges, they would get them under another. In this case, they now get to set precedence for online prostitution sites because they were able to convince them to strike a deal related to the prostitution charges and drop all the tax related ones. Great bout of legal manipulation by the courts there.
 

james t kirk

Well-known member
Aug 17, 2001
24,046
3,927
113
Why didnt they just host their domains overseas in a country with legal prostitution laws??

Also, I wonder how jailtime they'll get. Knowing the US they'll probably get 20 years or so :rolleyes:
Because they naively thought that they could get away with it.
 

Timbit

Tasty and Roundish
Jan 7, 2002
1,696
30
48
In Ecstacy
Hopefully it will be thrown out on first amendment issue. The government will need to prove that the site was actually used in prostitution and not just promote it.
A little late for that - according to the OP, they pleaded guilty...

Timbit
 

pusher69

Active member
Jun 11, 2006
539
89
28
If they had paid their taxes properly...this would not be an issue. They decided to move the money into other accounts to avoid taxes and in the end the IRS always gets their man/woman aka... Capone style.

There are other websites in the US that do the same... but they pay their taxes and the US government don't bother them.

The plea bargain is all about IRS getting their money and sending a message to every other domain...PAY YOUR TAXES and the US Government wont harass you.
 

TeasePlease

Cockasian Brother
Aug 3, 2010
7,738
5
38
The plea bargain is all about IRS getting their money and sending a message to every other domain...PAY YOUR TAXES and the US Government wont harass you.

Good advice but no guarantee.

Prosecuting attorneys are a career choice down there. You get some boy scout looking to make a name of himself and you're screwed. Not like up here where crown and enforcement counsel are the second-string players or seconded from the Bay street defense firms.....
 

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,358
12
38

GPIDEAL

Prolific User
Jun 27, 2010
23,358
12
38
Good advice but no guarantee.

Prosecuting attorneys are a career choice down there. You get some boy scout looking to make a name of himself and you're screwed. Not like up here where crown and enforcement counsel are the second-string players or seconded from the Bay street defense firms.....

Further to your response to the IRS getting its pound of flesh, if prostitution is fully illegal in the U.S., then isn't it still money laundering regardless of whether you claim such income for tax purposes? This can't simply be about paying your taxes.
 

icespot

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2005
1,692
84
48
Wow I feel so much safer that these people ar off of the street. :Eek:

Hopefully it will be thrown out on first amendment issue. The government will need to prove that the site was actually used in prostitution and not just promote it.


I noticed that the IRS was involved. That is how they might get them. We had MPs around here for years. They could never get them on prostitution. Finally shut them down using tax laws.
it's a pleas they cant appeal. They are both saying they are guilty of the crime and they are represented by lawyers. They must a had so much evidence against them, specially the tax man. That is the one that always makes everyone cry because they take everything and I. The courts almost no one ever beats the tax man.
 
The article mentions that it was part of a larger crackdown on child prostitution but they don't mention any charges involving that.

The two people arrested or charged put up a total of $750,000 in unsecured bonds between them. Looks like they saved up for this kind of emergency.
Yes, there were a lot of rumours surrounding that but I have no idea what was fuelled by the press and what was legitimate. It's possible that an inquiry into child prostitution (searching advertising sites for underage girls) simply drew attention to them being one of the larger advertising sites in the area and due to political pressure they became the target of another investigation, however it's also possible there were complaints about specific advertisers that were underage. As there are no charges laid it seems either there was no underage escorts on the site or they simply didn't have a strong case for it. We can't really know what happened with the information given but there are a few advertising sites that changed policies regarding advertising and proof of age after Redbook was shut down.
 
Toronto Escorts