BBWS: By Weight, at one point do you say a woman is a BBW
- Thread starter sukmy
- Start date
I'd consider them overweight, but I would take your word with respect to the 'beautiful' part.
The 5' 8'' woman competed in Fitness Model competitions, of all the ladies involved in those sorts of contests, I don't know if I've ever seen one that I would consider overweight.
The 5' 4'' woman was a late cut for the Canadian Women's hockey team, hard to believe she'd have gotten that close to the Olympics being overweight.
Interestingly, she and I went to a charity basketball game that her best friend was playing in, she pointed her out to me (lovely young lady), about 5' 11', and asked how much I figured she weighed. The lady was wearing basketball shorts and tee shirt, tucked in. Flat stomach, great tits, long lean legs, I guessed at 160 (and I'd be on her like White on Rice). My trainer laughed, "would you believe 190?" . This woman would turn heads anywhere.
OK you have convinced me. I have just booked a 5'10" 140lb girl...never before I booked anyone over 130lb. I will report in due course.
This was more of an exercise the gauge Terbites on their thoughts on this subject, and I personally do not think that a BBW can be defined by weight alone, although many men do, and will steer clear of any AD over a certain weight. Perhaps it is informative to see that 180 is the most chosen amongst the upper weight listings. Should SP's who want to advertise as BBWS list their weight at 180 if they want the attention of BBW lovers.
All this poll shows is that a significant number of men are fucking stupid with respect to weight.
Honestly...
Such ignorance on display for the world.
Not just ignorance either, pernicious, oppressive, arguably evil ignorance. Think of all those women starving themselves to death. You ignoramuses are partly to blame.
Get it through your dumb fucking skulls.
KATE MOSS IS NOT SEXY!!!!
Honestly...
Such ignorance on display for the world.
Not just ignorance either, pernicious, oppressive, arguably evil ignorance. Think of all those women starving themselves to death. You ignoramuses are partly to blame.
Get it through your dumb fucking skulls.
KATE MOSS IS NOT SEXY!!!!
As someone who was once hospitalized for anorexia.... cough cough.... (all better now - don't worry), the results of the poll kinda make me sad. 140 lbs is a normal weight for most women.
Anywaysss.... I agree that dress size and measurements are a much more accurate indicator.
Anywaysss.... I agree that dress size and measurements are a much more accurate indicator.
Might be normal, but pretty sure that's not the ideal weight every woman wants.
Most women wants to be anywhere between 100-125. But I guess, that depends on height as well. Most girls on average are between 5 foot 3 to 5 foot 6.
Of course there are alot of tall girls out there nowadays, but still I think for girls between 5 foot 8 to 6 foot would want to be around 120-130 pounds.
.... as I said before, you guys have no idea of what 100-125, 140, or 150 lbs look like on a woman of average height. I weigh 124-128 lbs, (depending on the day) If I weighed less, my ribs would stick out....Might be normal, but pretty sure that's not the ideal weight every woman wants.
Most women wants to be anywhere between 100-125, But I guess, that depends on height as well. Most girls on average are between 5 foot 3 to 5 foot 6.
Of course there are alot of tall girls out there nowadays, but still I think for girls between 5 foot 8 to 6 foot would want to be around 120-130 pounds.
When can you get it through your dumb fucking skull that this is
is not healthy !!!!!!! Kate Moss is to being thin as the above is to being fat.
There are much more women dying from fat related diseases than those who stay fit and healthy.
But Jenn, didn't you say you were 5 foot 7? That's not short by all means for a girl. I think you are right on the average. Like 100 pounds would be too skinny for you for your height. I dunno about 140 for your height, but I wasn't the one that classify that height/weight proportion as BBW. I actually voted for 180 lbs.
I think the BBW term for 140-150 lbs, are for girls under the average height. Pretty sure a girl that is like 5 foot 1, 140 pounds would look BBW to some guys.
You're using weight to define someone's size, so why are you reluctant to set your parameters for a BBW? Is it really all that misleading to set a number that doesn't include her dress size or bust measurement?
If not - generally speaking of course, for a woman of average height and fitness what weight makes her a BBW?
One thing that I have found and I'm not really into "chubby" girls but they seem to be much tighter than the really slim ones. Trust me I speak from experience, I know all chubs are not tight maybe I got lucky.
.... let's just say that right now, I weigh less than I have since before I entered the industry. This time last year I weighed 140 lbs - and I weighed 140 lbs when I was super duper fit with a lot of muscle mass a few years-ago. My weight has been listed as 128 lbs since I entered the industry (even back in my hfh days..) As far as I know, no one ever questioned that number....no one would've referred to me as being anything but average to slim.
yea, I agree it is ridiculous to classify that as BBW. All I am saying is, most girls wouldn't want that weight anyways for an ideal weight. Not to say 140 is BBW or overweight.
You could perhaps post a pic of yourself when you weigh 140 versus now at 124 maybe to prove your point.:thumb:
Going to the posters who think that one should be at the ideal weights for height etc....
...It should be noted that more recent studies show that being just over that ideal weight no less healthy on the body, but being under that ideal weight is actually very unhealthy.
140 is not much more on most women than being in the Just Over Ideal Weight class
@Jennifer--I was disabused of the notion of there being real 100lbs. girls out there in my early 20's when talking to women I worked with, and being way off in what I had guessed by close to 20lbs. It was then that I started getting an education on the weight differences between men and women. There are not very 100lb men out there, but if their were they would be way skinnier looking and generally more petite that a 100lb woman. Men are built denser than women on the whole.
I have a friend who is like 170 now, but when he was younger was 140, and he looks like a twig both then and now for the most part, but a 140-170lb woman would be way way curvier, and not just due to being shorter.
...It should be noted that more recent studies show that being just over that ideal weight no less healthy on the body, but being under that ideal weight is actually very unhealthy.
140 is not much more on most women than being in the Just Over Ideal Weight class
@Jennifer--I was disabused of the notion of there being real 100lbs. girls out there in my early 20's when talking to women I worked with, and being way off in what I had guessed by close to 20lbs. It was then that I started getting an education on the weight differences between men and women. There are not very 100lb men out there, but if their were they would be way skinnier looking and generally more petite that a 100lb woman. Men are built denser than women on the whole.
I have a friend who is like 170 now, but when he was younger was 140, and he looks like a twig both then and now for the most part, but a 140-170lb woman would be way way curvier, and not just due to being shorter.
it has always been my experience that a woman 125% her normal weight is fat past that they are really fat
As for bbw it is around 120%
As for bbw it is around 120%
