....and Arizona countered with Adin Hill in net, an AHL call up.Campbell soup starts tonight. He's 3-1-1 vs Arizona.
OK. Here's a question.So now Nylander is getting lumped in with Esposito, Gretzky AND Lemieux......right......
And last week, the Leafs played 3 games in 4 nights (4 games in 6 nights) with a career backup and got raked over the coals when they lost the last one. What's your point?It was Arizona's 3rd road game in 4 nights against a well-rested Leafs squad and it still had to go to overtime.
180 points sounds good to me.OK. Here's a question.
Nylander on approx. 80 pt./season pace, is soft and a liability.
Gretzky scores 180 pt./season, is soft and a great player.
How many points does a soft player need per season to be considered an asset.
So anything under that is still shit for a soft player?180 points sounds good to me.
You are so predictable it's actually quite boring.So anything under that is still shit for a soft player?
Mike Bossy was shit.
Patrick Kane is shit.
McDavid is shit.
Denis Savard was shit.
Bure.
Henri Richard.
None would be considered physical players.
At least now we know.
It was actually a very valid and simple question that you couldn't answer. You got the kind of reply your stupid answer deserved.You can't even resist biting on a stupid answer to a stupid question.
.
From the guy whose claim to fame is deleting threads and running home crying. Tell us why you deleted those threads.It's no surprise the usual suspects would bring up names of players who have been retired for decades. It would make much more sense to compare Nylander to his contemporaries.
For example, I would take Brendan Gallagher, Max Domi and Matthew Tkachuk before Nylander. (Nylander and Marner's plus/minus is 0. Marner picks up a lot of assists but he might not even score 20 goals this season.)
Whatever you say shack, you're the smart one here.It was actually a very valid and simple question that you couldn't answer. You got the kind of reply your stupid answer deserved.
Not necessarily, but my observations aren't based on being a hater with some kind of axe to grind.Whatever you say shack, you're the smart one here.
Of course, you're the only one that has clarity and objectivity.Not necessarily, but my observations aren't based on being a hater with some kind of axe to grind.
Good signing, he's earned his stay.Engvall signs 2 year deal at $1.25 million per year.
So far this season, it is Montreal 3-0 versus Toronto (6-5,5-2 and 2-1) and Montreal has lots of cap space.BTW, you will be able to pick Domi and Gallagher as your golf partners pretty soon and talk about the Habs' system.
3 -1, but the point is well made.So far this season, it is Montreal 3-0 versus Toronto (6-5,5-2 and 2-1) and Montreal has lots of cap space.
Engvall signs 2 year deal at $1.25 million per year.
And not much hit to the 2020 cap space. His agent is Claude Lemieux.Good signing, he's earned his stay.
How many points does cap space have this season?So far this season, it is Montreal 3-0 versus Toronto (6-5,5-2 and 2-1) and Montreal has lots of cap space.
His finest moment:His agent is Claude Lemieux.
