Toronto Escorts

17 More People Diagnosed With Deadly Viral Pneumonia in China

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,136
3,572
113
The virus has an estimated RO infection rate of 2.6. That means for every carrier of the virus he/she will likely infect an additional 2.6 people.
So if 1,000 Canadians carry the virus, within a week or so they will have infected 2,600 more Canadians.
A week later that becomes 6,760 Canadians.
The week after that its 17, 576 infected Canadians.
Etc...etc.

You can do the math from there.

Why on earth Trudeau hasnt banned all flights from China is fucking beyond me!! :confused:
 

WULA

Well-known member
Aug 12, 2012
604
384
63
Well the virus may be a good start.

Many or most of the World's Problems are directly linked to over-population.

Mother Nature works in mysterious ways.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,136
3,572
113
Former head of FDA says coronavirus is much worse than SARS in the way its transmitted:

Scott Gottlieb, MD@ScottGottliebMD

Ma Xiaowei, director of China’s National Health Commission, said #coronavirus has incubation period of 10 to 14 days, during which virus can be contagious but patients don’t display symptoms. That marks a major difference between this coronavirus and SARS
 

spraggamuffin

Well-known member
Oct 6, 2006
3,296
160
63

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,136
3,572
113
News conference on CP24 just said 19 people who were on the plane together with the victim are being held in hospital isolation with flu-like symptoms.

Just to be clear they said, that doesnt mean they have the coronavirus, they may just have a flu or a cold.
Isolating them was done out of precaution, rather then necessity
 

danmand

Well-known member
Nov 28, 2003
46,353
4,776
113
Why not? If the hospitals weren't handling it well you'd be the first to blame him.
Only simple minded people would.
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
People are dropping like flies. Globalism has finally met its match.
 
O

OnTheWayOut

Hold onto your pantyhose, Coronavirus origins in doubt

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/202...-not-be-source-novel-virus-spreading-globally

"The paper, written by a large group of Chinese researchers from several institutions, offers details about the first 41 hospitalized patients who had confirmed infections with what has been dubbed 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). In the earliest case, the patient became ill on 1 December 2019 and had no reported link to the seafood market, the authors report. “No epidemiological link was found between the first patient and later cases,” they state. Their data also show that, in total, 13 of the 41 cases had no link to the marketplace. “That’s a big number, 13, with no link,” says Daniel Lucey, an infectious disease specialist at Georgetown University."

"Andersen posted his analysis of 27 available genomes of 2019-nCoV on 25 January on a virology research website. It suggests they had a “most recent common ancestor”—meaning a common source—as early as 1 October 2019."

“Now It seems clear that [the] seafood market is not the only origin of the virus,” he wrote. “But to be honest, we still do not know where the virus came from now.”

Getting to the point no one knows how accurate the Chinese information is.
 

Mr.lover

Well-known member
Sep 5, 2001
703
345
63
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts