Guns in State Capitol.
- Thread starter derrick76
- Start date
There is no evidence of them doing anything. They are nowhere to be found. It seems social distancing was the what they were willing to take up arms for.... their fellow citizens bring murdered by the police....not so much.
Men of real integrity.
How do you know they aren't protesting? Do you know them personally? You probably think they are all racist and would never defend the killing of a black man. They obviously wouldn't bring assault rifles and fatigues. People are capable of protesting for both things. The lock down and the killing of George Floyd
Why would they do it in conflict against them? Is it because you think they are all racist? I'm injecting reality into the situation unlike you.
You. Do you have proof than none of the lock down protesters are protesting the killing of Floyd?
Are we still trying to make the case that people protesting the Michigan lockdown are racist?
It must suck to be a white Democrat. You're constantly preached to, told that if you don't follow the party line on all matters you are a racist.
Do the Liberal or NDP approach their natural constituency in such a condescending manner?
It must suck to be a white Democrat. You're constantly preached to, told that if you don't follow the party line on all matters you are a racist.
Do the Liberal or NDP approach their natural constituency in such a condescending manner?
Yes if you are a white Democrat tow the party line or you will lose your membership and all Republicans and people who voted for Trump including independents are racist.
Interesting how that group of armed, right wing, white supremacists barely managed two small protests.
Compare that to hundreds of thousands of people in 280 cities across the US, with now global protests matching for over a week.
That's the side you picked.
This thread is so long you might have overlooked that I said it was stupid to show up at the State Capitol armed with rifles. In any event, I typically don't pick sides until I am forced to vote for a candidate in the voting booth.
You mean can I prove a negative. My son grew out of that logic about 3 years ago. He’s 15 now.
My point is you made statements without any evidence, My grandson stopped doing that 2 years ago and he's 7
No, you are insisting I prove a negative. The absence of any evidence of participation by your armed social distancing freedom fighters is proof of their absence. That’s the the condition that would exist if they did not participate. Therefore, that is a sufficient condition.
But, if you can provide evidence of their participation, that would probably be a sufficient condition of their participation.
The blacks who vote for Trump are not black. The Latinos are not Latinos and women are not women- maybe they're lesbians.
You brought up the fact that they aren't participating. The onus is on you to prove it. You made the claim.
So all 60 million who voted for Trump are racists including Asians, Hispanics and Blacks? I think you're the one that racist. Painting people with the same brush based on who they voted for and why. It's time to take a look in the mirror and see yourself for the racist that you really are.
Nope. I said there was no evidence of them doing anything. There still isn’t. And that’s the condition that would exist if they haven’t done anything. That means the sufficient condition has been met.
But you can prove me wrong. I’m waiting.
You're going to be waiting a long time. You made the claim. You prove it. It's not up to me to disprove your claim. It's moot anyway. There is no evidence either way.
On the contrary. No evidence of something happening is evidence of something not happening. That’s the condition that would exist if something didn’t happen. That’s a sufficient condition. And that’s not moot.
Hence my claim that there is no evidence that your armed social distancing freedom fighters have done squat.
