Holy shit, boober.You tried to pass off a fake quote by injecting your own words (and narrative) into it and I caught you.
Boober really is the pigeon.So you made up shit, got caught, and are now trying to bluff your way out of it. You had a couple weeks to come up with proof and the only thing you found was a statement made long after your bullshit claim.
I am interested in how you think you can prove what you knew weeks ago. Maybe you have a security cam video of you reading about Japan and then forgetting about if for a while?
haha now it was "paraphrasing"? But you said a few posts back it was "punctuation"? You really think you are clever enough to try and slip in a fake news statement and mend together parts of quotes and no one would notice?Holy shit, boober.
I correctly quoted, then paraphrased, and then quoted.
All annotated so that anybody who isn't suffering from senile dementia could understand it.
Now, 3 pages later, you still don't understand that your reading comprehension failure is the issue here.
You need to get your nurses to help you with this one.
Why are you wasting so much time on your own failure?
You fucked up, just apologize.
Bluff? I'm not bluffing.So you made up shit, got caught, and are now trying to bluff your way out of it. You had a couple weeks to come up with proof and the only thing you found was a statement made long after your bullshit claim.
I am interested in how you think you can prove what you knew weeks ago. Maybe you have a security cam video of you reading about Japan and then forgetting about if for a while?
You really aren't bright enough for this conversation if you don't understand paraphrasing and the use of quotations.haha now it was "paraphrasing"?
You got caught. Deal with it. All your bullshit about puctuation and paraphrasing is just you doing damage control.You really aren't bright enough for this conversation if you don't understand paraphrasing and the use of quotations.
Google paraphrasing and see if you can understand it.
Then read the post again, not what is quoted and what is not.
Then read your accusation again.
Try it moving your mouth at the same time, maybe that will help with your concentration.
After that, if you can finally understand it, you should apologize.
Until then you really are the pigeon.
Unable to comprehend.
You're still lying.You failed and were caught peddling a fake quote. L
You were caught failing to read and comprehend, failure to understand punctuation and failure to apologize for your false accusation.'It will go away', take hydroxycloriquine 'what have you got to lose', no prep, never wearing a mask, cutting food stamps.....
"Fake Quote Franky"...Lol! FQF...has a nice ring to it!You're still lying.
There is no fake quote in this statement.
You were caught failing to read and comprehend, failure to understand punctuation and failure to apologize for your false accusation.
You really are the pigeon, boob.
You're still lying about 'puctuation' and my post.Puctuation...hahaha OMFG!!
You were caught failing to read and comprehend, failure to understand punctuation and failure to apologize for your false accusation.'It will go away', take hydroxycloriquine 'what have you got to lose', no prep, never wearing a mask, cutting food stamps.....
You typed the words not me or anyone else.You're still lying about 'puctuation' and my post.
There is no fake quote in this statement.
You were caught failing to read and comprehend, failure to understand punctuation and failure to apologize for your false accusation.
You really are the pigeon, boob.
You can't read.You typed the words not me or anyone else.
You're lying.
The Trump quotes were 'It will go away' and 'what have you got to lose'.Where did he say: 'It will go away', take hydroxycloriquine".
You were caught failing to read and comprehend, failure to understand punctuation and failure to apologize for your false accusation.'It will go away', take hydroxycloriquine 'what have you got to lose', no prep, never wearing a mask, cutting food stamps.....
You really have issues if you think it is possible to prove what you knew weeks ago. The only source you provided was a news article published long after you made your claim. And yes, unless you can prove the unprovable, the only logical conclusion is you are lying.Bluff? I'm not bluffing.
I said I would prove it to you. Apparently you are not taking me up on my offer and conditions. Why?
.....
You hang your hat on an article I posted on May 22nd.You really have issues if you think it is possible to prove what you knew weeks ago. The only source you provided was a news article published long after you made your claim. And yes, unless you can prove the unprovable, the only logical conclusion is you are lying.
Go ahead, try and prove this. I'll accept any terms you want. If you want it to be loser leaves than so be it. I'm sure you'll just be like your alter-ego franky and just come back with a new handle. Both of you guys spend way too many hours on here.
We both know the only possible result will be ridiculous and it won't stop you from braying on.
You claimed JAPAN condemned the WHO, not ONE Japanese politician (and the only source for that was a Taiwanese).You hang your hat on an article I posted on May 22nd.
I also posted a clip on May 17th. The clip itself was from March 29th. See post #339 in this thread.
I'm going to miss you.
Are you daft? Clip showed Aso Taro, Deputy PM of Japan speaking out against the WHO. Did you even watch it? Is he not a Japanese politician? OMFGYou claimed JAPAN condemned the WHO, not ONE Japanese politician (and the only source for that was a Taiwanese).
And don't worry, I know that despite losing you won't live up to the agreement.
As I said, the clip from Taiwanese media said a Japanese politician condemned the WHO, not the government of Japan.Are you daft? Clip showed Aso Taro, Deputy PM of Japan speaking out against the WHO. Did you even watch it? Is he not a Japanese politician? OMFG
It wasn't "a politician" it was the Deputy PM of Japan condeming the WHO and China.As I said, the clip from Taiwanese media said a Japanese politician condemned the WHO, not the government of Japan.
Japan is a Parliamentary system so no one individual defines government policy, not even the PM.
It wasn't "a politician" it was the Deputy PM of Japan condeming the WHO and China.
...
You attacked me for alledgedly lying that I provided any kind of proof about Japan condemning the WHO and China. Then I show you the proof of what I posted, and now you grasp at straws to back peddle on why you attacked me in the first place?Japan is a Parliamentary system so no one individual defines government policy, not even the actual PM.
Is wearing face masks official Canadian policy? Is kneeling at anti-racism protests official government policy?You attacked me for alledgedly lying that I provided any kind of proof about Japan condemning the WHO and China. Then I show you the proof of what I posted, and now you grasp at straws to back peddle on why you attacked me in the first place?
Parting words please...your honour is at stake here. You're not welching on an agreement are you? You have more integrity than that right?
Do the right thing and go out on your feet. With honour! Do it now please...
