”
Do you believe that ridiculous statement and how did you verify the truth of it from WHO or CDC?
.
They said 90% of the dead people are over 70 years old what is true. The 10% is younger than 70 years but almost all of them had chronic illnesses already. The whole site full of sources and official statistics you just have to read everything. Maybe it's not fit of your doomsday fantasy, but still much believable than any WHO stats.OP the link you posted in large letters has the following headline “Swiss Propoganda Research”
How does one take An article with that headliner seriously or even think of the article as something worth sharing online or repeating it’s claims?
Also they claim and I quote “10% of the deceased are over 90 years old. 90% of the deceased are over 70 years old.”
Do you believe that ridiculous statement and how did you verify the truth of it from WHO or CDC?
It’s truly amazing that they claim no one over 60 has died and no one under 70 with underlying conditions such as diabetes, heart conditions, immunocompromised, or respiratory issues has died. Truly amazing, but highly unlikely.
Read the article again.They said 90% of the dead people are over 70 years old what is true. The 10% is younger than 70 years but almost all of them had chronic illnesses already. The whole site full of sources and official statistics you just have to read everything. Maybe it's not fit of your doomsday fantasy, but still much believable than any WHO stats.[/B][/COLOR][/SIZE]
It's meaning in the 90% the 10% included. It never said 90% is between 70 to 90 years old. They say 90% are older than 70 years, included the 10% who were older than 90 years old.Read the article again.
They say this from the article "The average age of the positively-tested deceased in Italy is currently about 81 years.
10% of the deceased are over 90 years old.
90% of the deceased are over 70 years old."
That unverified stat is extremely unlikely.
The fact that you compare it to the flu is ignorance at best and shows your lack of understanding of the virus.
LOL you can't even read and understand what you are reading without your uneducated bias.It's meaning in the 90% the 10% included. It never said 90% is between 70 to 90 years old. They say 90% are older than 70 years, included the 10% who were older than 90 years old.
COVID-19 is not the flu. Listen to medical experts.They said 90% of the dead people are over 70 years old what is true. The 10% is younger than 70 years but almost all of them had chronic illnesses already. The whole site full of sources and official statistics you just have to read everything. Maybe it's not fit of your doomsday fantasy, but still much believable than any WHO stats.
At the same time USA expect in the 2020 flu season more than 38 million flu patient, 400.000 will be hospitalized and around 23.000 will be dead the end of the 2020 flu season. There are already more than 150 children died from the flu. Happened against the tens of millions flu shot and flu medicines. And no one worried about it. Interesting.
covid is up to 10 times deadlier, the symptoms of covid are different from the flu, flu has a vaccine, and the flu is seasonal. For all these reasons, we don't run out of ventilators when 19 million Americans get the flu each year. 180k still end up in hospital though... but they don't need ventilators since flu doesn't attack respiration in the same way.COVID-19 is not the flu. Listen to medical experts.
The world doesn't run out of ventilators during the flu season.
There's vaccines for the flu, but the majority of people don't get it. Flu vaccination coverage among adults was 37.1%, a decrease of 6.2 percentage points from the previous flu season. Vaccination coverage varied by age group and state, and coverage decreased in all age groups and in most states. In other words, many of the cases are preventable but people refuse to get vaccinated.
With the flu, you don't become contagious until you have symptoms. Not so with C-19.
There's currently no vaccine for C-19, meaning everyone is susceptible to caching it.
Bill Gates warned us. We were complacent and now we pay the price.
For the most part, covid is impacting people that are already sick, unhealthy/compromised, or old. Obesity, old age, and pre-existing serious medical conditions probably account for 95% of covid deaths.
And isolation is even better. It also addresses your point of being asymptomatic. If you have it with no symptoms, you would have had to have caught it prior to your isolation. Then if you are at home for two weeks, I think that you would no longer be a carrier.The problem is that many people are carriers and do not display symptoms. You can have full-blown COVID-19 and feel perfectly fine. So because you feel fine, you don't take precautions, pass it down the line, and someone who is elderly or vulnerable ends up contracting it and getting seriously ill.
Not socially distancing right now is socially irresponsible.
Absolutely correct; my bad for not saying "isolation", which is what we all should be doing. Cheers for the update.And isolation is even better. It also addresses your point of being asymptomatic. If you have it with no symptoms, you would have had to have caught it prior to your isolation. Then if you are at home for two weeks, I think that you would no longer be a carrier.
I also loved how the title said real stats. Just seeing that made me immediately suspicious.OP the link you posted in large letters has the following headline “Swiss Propoganda Research”
How does one take An article with that headliner seriously or even think of the article as something worth sharing online or repeating it’s claims?
Also they claim and I quote “10% of the deceased are over 90 years old. 90% of the deceased are over 70 years old.”
Do you believe that ridiculous statement and how did you verify the truth of it from WHO or CDC?
It’s truly amazing that they claim no one over 60 has died and no one under 70 with underlying conditions such as diabetes, heart conditions, immunocompromised, or respiratory issues has died. Truly amazing, but highly unlikely.
Yeah. If you are staying home alone, there's a reasonably good chance that you won't be within 6 feet of anyone else.Absolutely correct; my bad for not saying "isolation", which is what we all should be doing. Cheers for the update.