Discreet Dolls
Toronto Escorts

Joe Biden’s Sexual Assault Accuser Breaks Silence With Graphic Allegations

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,777
17,584
113
Trumptards will always put politics ahead of common morals and decency. Always.

They will totally support an old pedophile over protecting vulnerable teenage girls.
Fixed your post.
Until you guys take a stand with Trump and his Epstein buddy, your complaints are just hot air.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,340
5,565
113
You want better coverage than hearing her yourself? Oh you're waiting for CNN to say she's a Russian agent and can't be trusted. Okay I get it now,lol

Here's another one for you. Jimmy Dore who's a left winger says Biden is worse than Trump at 13:10

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14tfnIkQ-qU
Do not worry, as the Conspiracy Theories that are flooding the internet are practically all from the right wing. Well if you want to see the real conspiracy theories peddled by these right wingers, then here it is spelled out for you:

Jimmy Dore who gets on the Fox News on several occasions, has conspiracy theories about Russiagate and recently the DNC "rigging the Primaries" against Sanders is "left wing"??

Watch this interview:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/RSrVtqZyR3A/

Of course you will buy this BS. Show us when Jimmy Dore even condemned Trump in the same manner when 53 women came out to reveal the sexual assaults / rapes etc against him.

Dore even stated in that link that you provided, that the MSM will not bring up this sexual assault against Biden. But no doubt Trump will. Trump who currently has sexual and rape assault lawsuits against him?? That was the most hilarious statement!!
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,340
5,565
113
Give your head a shake dude. Not only did he bang her but she paid 293,000 for it,lol
Give your head a real shake if you think that his ass did not get spanked by Stormy. She used the Forbes Magazine. But banging with his tiny dick must have been no big deal to her. Anyway, Trump the liar also denied this whole affair plus the hush money, and his lawyer had to pay the price for his lies. A fact!!

Another consultant, whom Mother Jones did not name, responded, "Yep. She says one time he made her sit with him for three hours watching 'shark week.' Another time he had her spank him with a Forbes magazine."
https://www.newsweek.com/stormy-daniels-claims-trump-asked-spanking-785141
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
79,777
17,584
113
Give your head a real shake if you think that his ass did not get spanked by Stormy. She used the Forbes Magazine. But banging with his tiny dick must have been no big deal to her. Anyway, Trump the liar also denied this whole affair plus the hush money, and his lawyer had to pay the price for his lies. A fact!!



https://www.newsweek.com/stormy-daniels-claims-trump-asked-spanking-785141
Not to mention the piss video story, which is still more documented and legit.
With Trump being so petty as to hire sp's to piss on the bed Obama slept in?
Good thing Cohen worked to stop all videos coming out of Russia.

That's a good story.
 

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
23,036
46,169
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
Of course you will buy this BS. Show us when Jimmy Dore even condemned Trump in the same manner when 53 women came out to reveal the sexual assaults / rapes etc against him.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nz4ZlUbc_ig

I'd say he's pretty condemning here,lol, and he's now saying that Biden is worse!!!! ( there's 4 exclamation marks for your hyperbolic leftist appreciation)
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,340
5,565
113
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nz4ZlUbc_ig

I'd say he's pretty condemning here,lol, and he's now saying that Biden is worse!!!! ( there's 4 exclamation marks for your hyperbolic leftist appreciation)
He stated that only Hillary is hated more. Why would he state so, if he hates Trump that much?? Listen to that fact at around 58 seconds!!

I would take anything that he says with a pinch of salt. See how he took Obama's statement out of context here:

https://www.greanvillepost.com/2019...y-we-got-trump-instead-of-a-real-progressive/

But here he looks like he is interviewing someone who has very similar views to Butler:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dmhFvc-EHA

:bounce:
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
6,794
2,787
113
You still on that McCarthyism Russia Conspiracy theory? That's been debunked at this point.

Bloomberg did it. He spent $500,000,000 And couldn't break 10%. You think a few Facebook memes changed the election?

How about this. Now that Tulsi Gabbard has endorsed Biden, does that mean she is no longer being groomed by Putin(per statements by Hillary Clinton) or did Biden accept the endorsement of a Russian plant.

Take your time......
The crackpot whose allegations you support is just like you: she is a Bernie Supporter; she thinks Putin is amazing; and she will stop at nothing to tear down the DNC up to and including fake rape allegations. You and this nutty chic are cut from the same cloth.

You may well succeed in your effort to get Trump 4 more years. It must be nice to speak from such a position of privilege that you are unaffected by Trump’s relentless attacks on immigrants, minorities, and the poor. You are the kinda person that caused Malcolm X and MLK to distrust white liberals. You are the kinda person that causes black voters to distrust Bernie.

#VoteLikeABlackWoman
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
6,794
2,787
113
You want better coverage than hearing her yourself? Oh you're waiting for CNN to say she's a Russian agent and can't be trusted. Okay I get it now,lol

Here's another one for you. Jimmy Dore who's a left winger says Biden is worse than Trump at 13:10

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14tfnIkQ-qU
Who tf is Jimmy Dore. B1000 is a fake liberal, too...he spouts that kinda shit all the time...and nobody cares what he thinks either.
 

bver_hunter

Well-known member
Nov 5, 2005
27,340
5,565
113
Well 700,000 of his subscribers on Youtube seem to care.

Which is 700,000 more than care about what you have to say,lol

#believewomen
Nothing like Jimmy Kimmel or Jimmy Fallon's ratings. But the right wingers always seem to demonize them!!
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,713
3,411
113
Who tf is Jimmy Dore. B1000 is a fake liberal, too...he spouts that kinda shit all the time...and nobody cares what he thinks either.
If you think Joe Biden is a liberal than you really have no clue as to his record do you?
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,713
3,411
113
The crackpot whose allegations you support is just like you: she is a Bernie Supporter; she thinks Putin is amazing; and she will stop at nothing to tear down the DNC up to and including fake rape allegations. You and this nutty chic are cut from the same cloth.

You may well succeed in your effort to get Trump 4 more years. It must be nice to speak from such a position of privilege that you are unaffected by Trump’s relentless attacks on immigrants, minorities, and the poor. You are the kinda person that caused Malcolm X and MLK to distrust white liberals. You are the kinda person that causes black voters to distrust Bernie.

#VoteLikeABlackWoman
Lol. Because Joe Biden cares so much about the poor he is against Medicare for all, pro war, pro Wall st, pro credit card companies, anti bankruptcy for poor people........

Really? You need to figure out he isn't the lesser of two evils, he just has a bit a nicer cover.
 

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
23,036
46,169
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
Nothing like Jimmy Kimmel or Jimmy Fallon's ratings. But the right wingers always seem to demonize them!!
For the record I like Jimmy Fallon quite a bit. Kimmel not so much.

Both are network TV and are established shows. With what looks like 1.95 million views per show according to these stats.
https://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/w...tings-nov-11-15-2019-jimmy-kimmel-live-grows/

Anyways my point is that for a relatively new show (2017) on the internet which people have to make an actual effort to subscribe to, 700,000 is nothing to sneeze at. He is gaining a vast audience.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
“For a woman to come forward in the glaring lights of focus, nationally, you’ve got to start off with the presumption that at least the essence of what she’s talking about is real, whether or not she forgets facts, whether or not it’s been made worse or better over time,” Biden
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
6,794
2,787
113
A woman accuses Joe Biden of sexual assault, and all hell breaks loose online. Here's what we know
Alexandra Tara Reade accused Biden of sexual assault. Salon untangles fact from fiction in the politicized fall-out

Amanda Marcotte

Last week, podcaster Katie Halper, an avid fan of presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, released an episode of her podcast containing a shocking accusation: In an interview, Alexandra Tara Reade, who briefly worked for former Vice President Joe Biden when he was in the U.S. Senate, said that Biden had sexually assaulted her in 1993, pinning her up against a wall and digitally penetrating her during an encounter on Capitol Hill. At the same time, Ryan Grim of The Intercept — a publication which has been strongly supportive of Sanders and critical of Biden — published a story insinuating that the Time's Up Legal Defense Fund had rejected Reade's case out of political loyalty to Biden.

These twin stories are currently tearing up social media, with competing conspiracy theories flying from both pro-Biden and pro-Sanders camps in response. Biden supporters are accusing Reade of being a Russian agent, or at least a kook with suspicious intentions who's in love with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Sanders supporters are accusing the mainstream media and Time's Up of covering up Reade's accusations to protect Biden. (To be clear: Neither candidate's campaign has engaged with these conspiracy theories in any way.)

Reade says there were no witnesses to the alleged 1993 assault, which is of course extremely common in such cases. She said in her interview with Halper that she told her brother and a friend about the assault at the time, which Halper says she confirmed. That's the most common method of establishing credibility when reporting on allegations of sexual harassment or assault. The audio of the interview is compelling, as Reade speaks with a lot of emotion about the alleged assault. The same was true in her interviews with Salon.

Yet it is also true that outside of a handful of aggregated stories, there has been almost no high-profile media coverage of a story as explosive as this — an accusation that a former vice president and near-certain Democratic presidential nominee committed an act of sexual violence against a woman who worked for him. Why?

After reaching out to Reade, representatives from Time's Up, a lawyer who spoke with Reade, the Biden campaign, Reade's former bosses and the journalists who first broke the story, Salon hopes this story will offer clarity about what is and isn't true in the bizarre narratives swirling around Reade and her story. That clarity may also help answer the question of why the mainstream media has largely steered clear of this messy situation.

1. Is the mainstream media burying Reade's story out of loyalty to Biden and/or hatred of Sanders? That's unlikely. Here's why.

There's a reason why mainstream journalists such as Ronan Farrow of the New Yorker and Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey of the New York Times — all Pulitzer Prize winners for their meticulous coverage of the 2017 Harvey Weinstein investigation — are so careful when reporting allegations of sexual harassment and assault. (Salon is not addressing any individual outlet's choice not to cover this specific story, but the general considerations typically involved in such a decision.) It's not just about fairness to the accused, but also to the accusers. Women who tell these stories inevitably get blasted by skeptics who pick their stories apart, so it's critical to their safety that the reporting holds up under close scrutiny. That's only going to be more true when the story has major political implications or confusing twists that could be interpreted as red flags — or both, like this one does.

Reade's story of what happened during her tenure working for Biden has changed over time. In April of 2019, Reade spoke to a local Nevada County paper, claiming Biden "would touch me on the shoulder or hold his hand on my shoulder running his index finger up my neck during a meeting."

She also recounted an incident where she says she was told by staff that she had to serve drinks at a Biden event because he "liked my legs." She told Salon she rejected this request and complained directly to supervisors Marianne Baker and Dennis Toner. Reade says that her complaints led to being sidelined and pushed out of Biden's office. Both Baker and Toner denied to Salon ever having such a conversation with Reade.

Reade's April 2019 account of why she left Biden's office also conflicts with earlier things she has written. In a December 2018 Medium post she's since deleted, Reade wrote that she quit working for Biden to pursue a vocation in the arts and because she loves "Russia with all my heart" and rejected "the reckless imperialism of America" and what she saw as an anti-Russian view on Capitol Hill.

Before 2019, Reade lived under another name — she changed it for many years to escape an abusive husband, and provided the paperwork demonstrating this to Salon — and her public statements about Biden were entirely positive. After making her April 2019 allegations that Biden had touched her inappropriately, Reade spent months tweeting that story, dozens of times, at various figures — politicians, celebrities, media outlets, even Donald Trump — to no response.

Under both her current and prior name, Reade has expressed public support for a variety of Democratic politicians in the past, ranging from Sen. Cory Booker and Sen. Elizabeth Warren to Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and Marianne Williamson. Then, over the past few months, Reade began heavily retweeting pro-Sanders accounts and regularly engaging with prominent Sanders supporters like Halper. It was during this time that Reade started to hint publicly that what happened with Biden had been far more serious than her 2019 story detailed. Such hinting led — as Reade told Salon, which Halper confirmed — to an anonymous woman suggesting that Reade seek Halper out to tell her full story.

When asked why her story had changed so much in the past year, Reade told Salon that she had considered describing the assault to the original reporter from the Nevada County paper, but the "way he asked the questions" had "shut me down." (That reporter did not respond to Salon's request for comment.) She also said she felt intimidated by social media attacks and threats in the aftermath of her original accusations, and therefore stayed silent.

The timeline shows that Reade's involvement in the online world of Bernie fandom coincided with her escalation of accusations against Biden. To be clear, this does not mean she's lying. But taken along with the other discrepancies in Reade's accounts — which are also, on their own, not reasons to discredit her — it's enough to make publications take a slow and careful approach to amplifying this story.

"Other outlets, for good reason, do their own reporting on stories like this," Grim told Salon. "As they do, I expect we'll see more coverage."

Salon asked Grim and Halper about their reporting process, but got few answers. Halper confirmed Reade had been connected to her through a woman on Twitter. Grim confirmed that he and Reade have been in contact since early March. (Grim has relevant experience here: He broke the story about Christine Blasey Ford writing to Sen. Dianne Feinstein with her accusation that Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh had attempted to rape her in high school.)

Grim and Halper have both publicly said that they spoke to Reade's brother and friend, who both confirmed that Reade had told them about the alleged assault when it happened. Attempts to reach the brother and the friend — key steps in reporting a story like this independently — have proven fruitless for Salon. Reade did not respond to Salon's request for her friend's identity, and Reade's brother has not responded to Salon's requests to talk.

In light of these details, Salon concludes that mainstream outlets who are being criticized for not writing about Reade's allegations probably aren't making that choice because they're covering up for Joe Biden. What's more likely driving the silence — so far — is a genuine reluctance to dive into a story that contains such a high number of complicating factors and proves difficult to pin down, especially with the coronavirus emergency dominating the news cycle.
Cont’d
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
6,794
2,787
113
2. Did Time's Up refuse to help Reade as a political favor to Biden? Almost certainly not.

As Reade herself said when she was interviewed by pro-Sanders pundit Krystal Ball, Time's Up offered her considerable help when she first reached out to the organization. In its partnership with the National Women's Law Center, Time's Up connected Reade with a number of lawyers who interviewed her to see if she had a case worth pursuing. None of those lawyers took Reade on as a client.

It's important to understand here that Time's Up Legal Defense Fund only provides support beyond these referrals — such as PR assistance — if a client obtains a lawyer and moves to take legal action against workplace harassment. But Reade told Salon she wasn't interested in suing Biden. Instead, she was angry "about the smears about being a Russian agent" from Biden supporters and was hoping a lawyer could find a way to stop them.

One law firm Reade spoke with confirmed that they would not take a case with the ambiguous goal of trying to shut down people on social media who were speculating about an accuser being a "Russian agent."

Carrie Goldberg runs a firm dedicated to defending women against sexual abuse. Time's Up helped Reade set up a meeting with her. Goldberg told Salon that she would not "comment on who reaches out to our firm for help" but said that "our firm never hesitates to take on powerful adversaries." She said her firm is not, however, in the business of threatening "to sue conspiracy theorists for potentially protected speech."

Salon's discussions with Reade indicated that she was less interested in legal action and more in public relations representation — for "protection" and to handle "being inundated" by phone calls from reporters. After this interview, Reade continued to send messages to Salon indicating her anger over not getting help with PR. But Time's Up is primarily a legal organization, and is not in the business of running PR for accusers who aren't going through the court system.

In a written statement to Salon, Uma Iyer of the National Women's Law Center confirmed what Grim reported in The Intercept — their status as a nonprofit comes with "a strict and absolute prohibition on participating in electioneering or political campaign activity." Considering Reade's active presence on Bernie Twitter and her enthusiasm for the Sanders campaign, the concerns that any involvement with her allegations during a presidential primary could be perceived as electioneering don't seem unfounded.

SKDKnickerbocker, the firm that Time's Up hires to do PR support for their legal cases, was founded by Anita Dunn, who is an adviser to Joe Biden. This fact has attracted the attention of many pro-Sanders people on social media who are eager to sense an "establishment" conspiracy, which is understandable. But considering the multiple reasons that Time's Up had to say no to Reade before involving the PR side — she has no legal representation, she's not suing anyone and the whole story could potentially be interpreted as electioneering — there's no reason to believe that Dunn ran interference to quell Reade's story.

3. Is Reade a Russian agent? That's also highly doubtful, and here's why.

Back in April 2019, when Reade accused Biden of inappropriate touching and his office of sidelining her for complaints, Biden supporters and journalists like Edward Isaac-Dovere of the Atlantic attempted to discredit Reade by noting that she had written essays expressing her affection for Vladimir Putin. Biden supporters have pulled this narrative back into play in the wake of Reade's interview with Halper.

Reade has since deleted the essays that positioned her as an avid Putin fan, but some screenshots and internet archives remain. In 2018, she wrote in a Medium post that Putin "has saved the world from a large conflict on more than one occasion" and "brought a chaotic and failed nation to become a vibrant, creative, economic force within a decade," crediting him with "emotional intelligence" and "an alluring combination of strength with gentleness."

In another 2018 post at Medium, she wrote, "President Putin scares the power elite in America because he is a compassionate, caring, visionary leader."

When asked about it, Reade told Salon she had been writing a novel about Russia at the time and "the blogs read political because I was kind of in that immersion of doing Russian stuff for this novel." She also told Salon that she had been influenced by Oliver Stone's pro-Putin documentary and a Russian friend who praised Putin.

After doing "more research," she told Salon she now feels differently about Putin, although if that's true her change of heart seems to be quite recent. In February 2020, Reade scolded actor and major Sanders supporter John Cusack "not to repeat xenophobic propaganda against Russia" and lamented that "Putin in 2006 was Hollywood A listers darling now he is the evil master mind."

The fact that Reade made such a clumsy effort to clean up her fringe views in the recent past isn't a great look, but it's also not the gotcha moment that Biden supporters might think. It's critical to understand — and a lot of Biden supporters apparently don't get this — that being overly credulous about Oliver Stone documentaries, or even about foreign despots, doesn't mean that someone is lying about a sexual assault.

Ultimately, Salon is forced to conclude that anyone actually working for Russian intelligence would have done a better job covering her tracks.

4. Is Reade that mentally ill woman who was on "Dr. Phil" claiming Putin was going to marry her? Absolutely not.

A few months ago, Dr. Phil interviewed a woman named "Jennifer" and her three adult children about "Jennifer's" delusional belief that Putin was in love with her and that they were engaged, despite having never met.

Reade is absolutely not Jennifer, and she does not think she's engaged to Putin.

Salon tracked down the real identity of the person Dr. Phil interviewed, as well as two of her children. After speaking with the daughter of Jennifer, we can safely say that Jennifer is an entirely different person. (Salon is protecting the identities of these people so they don't get harassed by either Biden or Sanders partisans — they really, truly have nothing to do with this story.)

The fact Salon even had to go to the lengths of tracking down this family and pestering them for information speaks to how toxic the narrative around Reade has become, with Biden fans running rampant on Twitter and spreading false rumors painting her as wildly delusional.

5. What's the big takeaway here? There are several.

Biden's communications director, Kate Bedingfield, said the allegations are false and issued this terse statement to Salon: "Women have a right to tell their story, and reporters have an obligation to rigorously vet those claims."

The story of Reade's allegations against Biden shows what can happen when the rigorous standards espoused by mainstream publications are sidestepped for a more credulous and politicized approach. The failure to vet this story methodically and to preemptively address its odder elements opened the door to a whirlwind of conspiracy theories and misinformation.

Some Sanders supporters are lobbing wild accusations of a cover-up by the mainstream media and Time's Up for not publicizing Reade's story. In turn, some Biden supporters are being reckless — whether by assuming Reade is lying, or by spreading ridiculous conspiracy theories about her, or both. No doubt some folks on either side of the political divide would be reacting the same way no matter what, but the situation has been made significantly worse because of the slipshod manner in which Reade's allegations were reported and released.

Organizations like Time's Up and mainstream journalists take great care with politically sensitive accusations like Reade's. That isn't because they're cowards. It's because they fear situations just like this, where piecemeal reporting and the perception of slanted coverage create a political food fight that ends up pushing what is supposed to be the central concern — resisting sexual harassment and violence — to the sidelines.

No matter how it may be interpreted, "believe women" has never been an injunction to publish every allegation of sexual abuse without hesitation or reservation. It's about taking these stories seriously on their own terms, instead of dismissing them as women's attempts to manipulate people and public opinion. For journalists, it means we must take stories of sexual abuse seriously and treat them carefully and thoroughly; as Rebecca Traister said on Twitter in 2017, that means publishing stories that are "reported, investigated, fact checked & backed up by the outlets reporting on them."

What can be said is that Reade's story is credible and compelling in some important ways, and also comes with a number of troubling red flags. For a variety of reasons it has not been taken seriously on a national level, but those reasons do not include a mainstream media conspiracy to protect Joe Biden. Rather than becoming the subject of serious investigation, this has instead become an occasion for die-hard supporters on both the Sanders and Biden sides to score points on one another online. Actual facts have been supplanted by reckless conspiracy theories spun by enthusiasts of both candidates. Whatever the facts of this case may be, the #MeToo movement deserves better than to be dragged into the sleaze like this.

https://twitter.com/salon/status/1245085995256733698?s=21
 

Knuckle Ball

Well-known member
Oct 15, 2017
6,794
2,787
113
Didnt read.

Too long and not to the point.

You get an "A" in your copy and paste efforts though. Did you do that all by yourself?

More importantly, did you even read a line of it??? LOL
I went to all the trouble to cut, paste, and format this article to help make it more easily readable. Unfortunately, I guess it didn’t help you much.

If you have trouble comprehending written material I would be happy to read it out loud to you over the phone.

Shoot me a pm...I am always happy to help my less literate terb brothers.

:)
 

smallhatchet

Well-known member
Feb 10, 2020
2,071
221
63
I went to all the trouble to cut, paste, and format this article to help make it more easily readable. Unfortunately, I guess it didn’t help you much.

If you have trouble comprehending written material I would be happy to read it out loud to you over the phone.

Shoot me a pm...I am always happy to help my less literate terb brothers.

:)
Sorry Knuckle Ball. I didnt notice the way you formatted it.

I'll shoot you a PM when I need clarification because at this point, im not really following a thing you're saying.

Maybe we can go to lunch sometime at your favorite eatery and maybe hit on some waitresses while discussing politics??
 

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
23,036
46,169
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
Didnt read.

Too long and not to the point.

You get an "A" in your copy and paste efforts though. Did you do that all by yourself?

More importantly, did you even read a line of it??? LOL
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkuAF2B5o8M

Just watch this from Krystal. Her show absolutely destroys the Amanda Marcotte hit piece and shows her obvious political bias,lol.
 
Toronto Escorts