Toronto Escorts

House passes historic legislation to make lynching a federal hate crime

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,484
113
Look at who voted against it...


February 26, 2020 - 02:37 PM EST

House passes historic legislation to make lynching a federal hate crime

BY JULIEGRACE BRUFKE

The House on Wednesday overwhelmingly passed historic legislation that would classify lynching as a federal hate crime.

The Emmett Till Antilynching Act, which passed on a 410-4 vote, was introduced by Rep. Bobby Rush (D-Ill.). It is named after Emmett Till, a 14-year-old African American boy who was lynched in 1955 in Mississippi.

Independent Rep. Justin Amash (Mich.) and GOP Reps. Louie Gohmert (Texas), Thomas Massie(Ky.) and Ted Yoho (Fla.) voted against the bill.

The measure's passage comes roughly 120 years after a committee in the lower chamber defeated legislation that would have criminalized lynchings. It also passed decades after the House approved its first bill, by Rep. Leonidas C. Dyer (R), that would have made lynchings a federal crime. That legislation was ultimately filibustered in the Senate.

“Today the House will pass the Emmett Till Antilynching Act and designate lynching as a hate crime under federal law. But we must admit, it is a travesty that it has taken 120 years for the U.S. government to address this crime. In fact, the first bill to outlaw lynching was introduced in 1900. Make no mistake, lynching is terrorism,” Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.), the chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, said on the floor ahead of the vote Wednesday.

“It's terrorism directed at African Americans. Lynching was commonly used for 256 years during the period of enslavement and for almost 100 years after slavery, well into the 1950s. And frankly, even today periodically you will hear news stories of nooses being left on college campuses, in work locker rooms to threaten and terrorize African Americans. A vicious reminder that the past is never that far away.”

Rush, meanwhile, noted the racially motivated fatal shooting that took place in El Paso, Texas, and the violence seen during the 2017 white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Va., while citing the need for the measure's passage.

“We are one step closer to finally outlawing this heinous practice and achieving justice for over four thousand victims of lynching, including Emmitt Till. Moreover, the importance of this bill cannot be overstated. From Charlottesville to El Paso, we are still being confronted with the same violent racism and hatred that took the life of Emmett and so many others. The passage of this bill will send a strong and clear message to the nation that we will not tolerate this bigotry,” he said in a statement following the announcement it would be brought to the floor.

The Senate passed legislation in 2018 to make lynching a federal hate crime, but it ultimately did not make it through the lower chamber.

“Lynchings were horrendous, racist acts of violence,” Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), one of the sponsors of the Senate bill, said in a statement. “For far too long Congress has failed to take a moral stand and pass a bill to finally make lynching a federal crime. ... This justice is long overdue.”

House Republicans praised the measure, but expressed frustration that more time was not allocated for GOP lawmakers to co-sponsor the bill.

Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) told reporters he was considering calling for a unanimous consent vote to allow members to co-sponsor the bill, adding that Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) previously introduced the legislation during the 115th Congress and the 116th Congress.

“That actually was a bill Don Bacon filed, and it had a lot of co-sponsors and a lot of support behind it, and then they literally in the middle of night stole it from him. And look, I'm for the bill, but they should have opened it up to more co-sponsors,” Scalise said on Wednesday.

"I'm for the bill, I'd like to be a co-sponsor, but they moved it out quickly to the point where under the rules, you can't add yourself as a co-sponsor," he added. "And I'd like to seek a motion to seek unanimous consent to allow every member to be a co-sponsor that wants to be, but so far they have not allowed that under the rules.”

Bacon thanked Rush and Harris for being champions of the issue, stating that it’s long overdue for legislation to “specify criminal penalties for the crime of lynching or any attempt or conspiracy to commit lynching.”

“Last year, I was approached by local African American community leaders to look into antilynching legislation. And I felt the language from Senator Harris's bill that passed by overwhelming, bipartisan support in the Senate, was the right way to proceed,” he said on the floor.

“It's because of these reasons I was honored to introduce the Senate-passed language in the House. The bill we are voting on today contains the language of my bill that I introduced eight months ago verbatim. I do not complain because, in the end, I want results, we want results. We are closer than we have ever been in making lynching a federal crime.”

Jordain Carney contributed.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/484742-house-passes-historic-legislation-to-make-lynching-a-federal-hate-crime
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
It's heartwarming to see the Democrats finally turning their backs on their racist past. Turning the page, so to speak. And it only took them 120 years.... Good for them.
 

Mr Deeds

Muff Diver Extraordinaire
Mar 10, 2013
6,029
3,088
113
Here
It's heartwarming to see the Democrats finally turning their backs on their racist past. Turning the page, so to speak. And it only took them 120 years.... Good for them.
I wonder sometime if you actually believe some of the shit you come up with or are you just trying to stir up shit
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
I wonder sometime if you actually believe some of the shit you come up with or are you just trying to stir up shit
Believe it, never doubt it! And if you knew the history of the Democratic Party, you would, too. Hint, NOT the party of Lincoln.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,953
17,950
113
It's heartwarming to see the Democrats finally turning their backs on their racist past. Turning the page, so to speak. And it only took them 120 years.... Good for them.
Nothing like a little sarcasm to show your colours here.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Nothing like a little sarcasm to show your colours here.
What colors? You're obsessed with colors. What are you arguing? Am I wrong or are you just trolling?
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
47,077
8,145
113
Toronto
Why is there soo much fear of racists or have the need to label someone a racist?
So non-racists were responsible for lynching the blacks in the south?
 

Mr Deeds

Muff Diver Extraordinaire
Mar 10, 2013
6,029
3,088
113
Here
It's heartwarming to see the Democrats finally turning their backs on their racist past. Turning the page, so to speak. And it only took them 120 years.... Good for them.
Yes because under all the white robes are Democrats.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
Yes because under all the white robes are Democrats.
LOL! That's right. The KKK was a sister organization for the Democrats. But, hey! That's history and I'm just as happy that they moved on. Of course we should never forget, eh? Steyer is running on reparations for slavery, they could start with the DNC. Although, I suspect, that Bernie will object as the slave owners, like the commies, were not all bad and provided their African guests with free room and board.
 

K Douglas

Half Man Half Amazing
Jan 5, 2005
26,247
6,520
113
Room 112
Out of curiosity I googled and found out the last lynching of a black person in the United States took place in 1981. But hey it's nice to see some bi partisan legislation for a change.
 

Frankfooter

dangling member
Apr 10, 2015
80,953
17,950
113
Why is there soo much fear of racists or have the need to label someone a racist?

I find it disgusting the way some of you members throw the term around here. At least do some research on the definition before using it.
This was one of the quotes from jcpro that got there.
I don't embrace cultural diversity. I believe that cultures are unequal; some are better than other and some are simply worthless.
But it really came out in one of those endless Israel/Palestine debates where jcpro said Jews were superior genetically to Palestinians.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
This was one of the quotes from jcpro that got there.


But it really came out in one of those endless Israel/Palestine debates where jcpro said Jews were superior genetically to Palestinians.
The last sentence of your post is a lie. And if you believe that a culture of say women abuse in Saudi of Afghanistan or practice of female genital mutilation or the old Hindu sati tradition are somehow equal to the western one- that's on you.
 
Toronto Escorts