Toronto Escorts

Prince Charles flies on a jet emitting six tonnes of CO2 to flight climate change

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
12,309
1,665
113
Ghawar
Martin Robinson
22 January 2020

Prince Charles demanded global green taxes as part of a radical push to tackle climate change in a seminal speech at Davos today.

The Prince of Wales met Greta Thunberg at the Word Economic Forum after flying in to Switzerland on a private jet – but did not hold talks with Donald Trump.

Charles even sounded like the 17-year-old Swedish activist as he asked VIPs: 'Do we want to go down in history as the people who didn't do anything to bring the world back from the brink? The only limit is our willingness to act and the time to act is now'.

He then begged delegates, including wealthy global business leaders: 'This is why I need your help, your ingenuity and your practical skills to ensure that the private sector leads the world out of the approaching catastrophe into which we have engineered ourselves.'

Speaking just 24 hours after President Trump used his speech to reject environmental 'prophets of doom', Charles called for new eco-taxes, greener fuels and hydrogen-powered planes by 2030.

In his first keynote speech to the conference in 30 years, hailed by environmentalists as a landmark moment and branded royal meddling in global affairs by critics, he said: 'Global warning, climate change and the devastating loss of biodiversity are the greatest threats humanity has ever faced, and one largely of its own creation'.

He added: 'Now it is time to take it to the next level. In order to secure our future and to prosper we need to evolve our economic model'.

Earlier today the Prince of Wales flew to Switzerland on a chartered plane costing an estimated £15,000 before jumping in an electric Jaguar - but he missed Donald Trump who carried out his final press conference and then left the summit just as the royal took to the stage.

The heir to throne later met Greta Thunberg but the US President dodged her for a second year, using his own speech yesterday to pointedly blast 'prophets of doom' on climate change and snubbed their 'predictions of the apocalypse' in favour of 'optimism'.

And today Mr Trump lashed out at Miss Thunberg again telling her not to focus on the United States, but other nations before saying demands made by activists like her are 'unrealistic to a point where you can't live your lives'.

Mr Trump met Charles
twice on visits to Britain in 2019 - the first for a state visit last June and then for NATO talks in December.

In their first meeting at Clarence House over the summer the royal spent 75 minutes longer than expected with the leader of the free world, trying to convince him of the dangers of global warning. Trump is said to have called the US 'clean' and pointed the finger at other countries.

The President then told Piers Morgan ITV's Good Morning Britain the following day he had a 'great' meeting with Charles but said the Queen's eldest son 'did most of the talking'.

Greta Thunberg watched Trump's Davis speech yesterday and afterwards introduced a talk on 'Averting a Climate Apocalypse', in which she scolded the world's elites for not doing enough to deal with the climate crisis.

Today Prince Charles smiled as he shook her hand but while they will have discussed climate change, details of what they said has not yet been revealed.

Around an hour earlier Charles told leaders gathered at the Forum: 'Ladies and gentleman, you all have a seat at the table as this must be the year that we put ourselves on the right track.'

He added: 'Do we want to go down in history as the people who did nothing to bring the world back from the brink, in trying to restore the balance, when we could have done? I don't want to.

'Just think for a moment, what good is all the extra wealth in the world gained from business as usual if you can do nothing with it except watch it burn in catastrophic conditions.

'This is why I need your help, your ingenuity and your practical skills to ensure that the private sector leads the world out of the approaching catastrophe into which we have engineered ourselves.'

In his speech, the Prince of Wales suggested 10 practical steps to avert climate crisis, such as:

Invest in STEM (science, technology, engineering and maths) to help make sure new technologies are able to make it to market.

Re-thinking how we can put nature at the heart of how the world economy operates.

Invest in sectors such as agriculture and forestry.

Away from the turmoil caused by Harry and Meghan's emigration to Canada, Charles travelled from St Gallen to Davos in a fully electric Jaguar I-Pace, rather than using a helicopter - but did fly to Switzerland in a private jet, which will produces six tonnes of carbon per passenger compared to 0.19 tonnes on a commercial flight.

The London to Davos leg of the journey would cost around £15,000 [$20,000] by private plane alone - and will cost the same again as he heads to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories later.

Charles' usual ministerial jet Voyager is believed to be undergoing scheduled maintenance

Today he warned in his Davos speech that the world is in the midst of a crisis that 'is now I hope well understood'.

He added: 'Global warning, climate change and the devastating loss of biodiversity are the greatest threats humanity has ever faced.'

He described his dedication to encouraging corporate, social and environmental responsibility as an 'uphill struggle'.

But he added: 'Now it is time to take it to the next level. In order to secure our future and to prosper we need to evolve our economic model.'

The prince used his speech to launch a new Sustainable Markets Initiative to help financial markets become more sustainable.

He outlined 10 practical actions to drive the approach, including identifying game-changers and barriers to transition and investing in Stem (science, technology, engineering, and maths) and innovation, adding this included 'AI, where that does not seek to challenge or replace unique human characteristics and intuition'.

Charles, on a positive note, said the world was 'further ahead than we might think' in achieving the goal of a profitable but sustainable future, citing developments such as plans for green engines for ships and opportunities to develop commercially viable, hydrogen-powered and electric aircraft within the decade.

The prince, who is facing his youngest son the Duke of Sussex quitting royal life, took the opportunity to praise his eldest, the Duke of Cambridge, for his environmental work.

'Critically, we must foster innovation - and here, if you will allow me, I would like to acknowledge the new Earthshot initiative of my son, the Duke of Cambridge, which seems to me to extol the sort of horizon-lifting approach we need in order to give us hope,' he said.

In his speech in the Swiss resort Charles said that being socially and environmentally responsible should be the cheapest option available to all.

'We cannot expect consumers to make sustainable choices if these choices are not clearly laid before them,' he said.

'As consumers increasingly demand sustainable products, they deserve to be told more about product lifecycles, supply chains and production methods.

'For a transition to take place, being socially and environmentally conscious cannot only be for those who can afford it.

'If all the true costs are taken into account, being socially and environmentally responsible should be the least expensive option because it leaves the smallest footprint behind.'

Charles has vowed to use his platform to get the message out.

'With 2020 being seen as the 'super year', kick-starting a decade of action for people and planet, I intend to do my utmost to ensure that the message of urgency, systemic change, collaboration and integration is heard,' he said.

The heir to the throne hopes his Sustainable Markets Council, which is supported by the World Economic Forum, will bring together leading individuals from the public and private sectors, charitable organisations and investors to identify ways to rapidly decarbonise the global economy and make the transition to sustainable markets.

.........................................

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...tonnes-carbon-launch-sustainable-project.html
 

mandrill

Well-known member
Aug 23, 2001
70,636
69,590
113
What is he supposed to do?.... Paddle a dinghy?

This is Daily Mail "Whataboutism" at its finest.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
12,309
1,665
113
Ghawar
I can understand the security concern for Donald Trump
flying on a commercial jet. I never thought flying 1st class
is too much of a sacrifice for royalties.
 

shack

Nitpicker Extraordinaire
Oct 2, 2001
46,935
8,116
113
Toronto
What is he supposed to do?.... Paddle a dinghy?

This is Daily Mail "Whataboutism" at its finest.
It is the same complaint every time an environmental activist flies. I remember the deniers and/or fossil fuel investors whining about Al Gore, Thunberg, David Suzuki and now this.

They should just read the old posts instead of wasting bandwidth.
 

Ginomore

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2011
941
326
63
It is the same complaint every time an environmental activist flies. I remember the deniers and/or fossil fuel investors whining about Al Gore, Thunberg, David Suzuki and now this.

They should just read the old posts instead of wasting bandwidth.
They need to be called out for their hypocrisy.
 

Grimnul

Well-known member
May 15, 2018
1,482
28
48
They need to be called out for their hypocrisy.
It’s not really hypocrisy if they have no choice. How else does someone get halfway around the world in a day? I’m sure if they had an alternative, they’d be using it. When we have transporters or something and these people are still flying on planes, then that argument may have some legs to stand on. As-is, it’s just politicking.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
12,309
1,665
113
Ghawar
Isn't commercial flight an alternative to flying by private jets
for the likes of Harrison Ford and Leonardo DiCaprio especially
for trips to some climate change event?
 

Grimnul

Well-known member
May 15, 2018
1,482
28
48
Isn't commercial flight an alternative to flying by private jets
for the likes of Harrison Ford and Leonardo DiCaprio especially
for trips to some climate change event?
Not necessarily, because there are potential security concerns.
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
12,309
1,665
113
Ghawar
I too wish private jet flying is more accessible to
travellers. It is also potentially more secure for common
folks as well as Hollywood celebrities. I would worry
less about hijacking than if I were flying commercial.
 

Grimnul

Well-known member
May 15, 2018
1,482
28
48
I too wish private jet flying is more accessible to
travellers. It is also potentially more secure for common
folks as well as Hollywood celebrities. I would worry
less about hijacking than if I were flying commercial.
The difference is that you are, and I mean this in the nicest way possible, a nobody. There’s almost certainly no one out there who cares enough about you to try something. As is the case with all of us peasants who fly commercial. A celebrity or member of the royal family is famous. There very well may be someone out there unhinged enough to want to hurt them for some reason.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
If we only had a technology available to us that could make it possible to communicate, both ways, via sound and picture. I would name that invention "teleconference". Some day...
 

Grimnul

Well-known member
May 15, 2018
1,482
28
48
If we only had a technology available to us that could make it possible to communicate, both ways, via sound and picture. I would name that invention "teleconference". Some day...
To be fair, a lot of the time they do use something like that. The problem is that there is often the expectation that these people be there in person and if they opt to use Skype or whatever, they’re criticized for not appearing in person. It’s damned if you do, damned if you don’t. If they fly there, they get criticized for being hypocritical for flying there. If they don’t, they get criticized for caring so little that they can’t even be bothered to actually show up. It’s almost as if certain groups just want to tar them regardless of what they do...
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
To be fair, a lot of the time they do use something like that. The problem is that there is often the expectation that these people be there in person and if they opt to use Skype or whatever, they’re criticized for not appearing in person. It’s damned if you do, damned if you don’t. If they fly there, they get criticized for being hypocritical for flying there. If they don’t, they get criticized for caring so little that they can’t even be bothered to actually show up. It’s almost as if certain groups just want to tar them regardless of what they do...
Oh, I'm sure that the climate purists would understand. Wouldn't they?
 

Grimnul

Well-known member
May 15, 2018
1,482
28
48
And what choice do regular people have?? Paddle a dinghy to work every day??
Exactly. And until we come up with a better solution than fossil fuels, there won’t be a solution to any of this. This is why we need to work on this. Fossil fuels are a finite resource anyway, so regardless of whether you believe in climate change, it’s still imperative that we find an alternative energy source. Might as well get started on it now.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,274
3,638
113
Exactly. And until we come up with a better solution than fossil fuels, there won’t be a solution to any of this. This is why we need to work on this. Fossil fuels are a finite resource anyway, so regardless of whether you believe in climate change, it’s still imperative that we find an alternative energy source. Might as well get started on it now
I'm with you on all this. We will eventually run out of oil anyways, so lets find a good, clean fuel source.

But I stand my ground, global warming is just being used as a bullshit excuse to achieve that goal.
Our fucking winters are just as cold as they were 30 years ago, and thats a fact.

Cheers!!
 

Grimnul

Well-known member
May 15, 2018
1,482
28
48
I'm with you on all this. We will eventually run out of oil anyways, so lets find a good, clean fuel source.

But I stand my ground, global warming is just being used as an excuse to achieve that goal.
Our fucking winters are just as cold as they were 30 years ago, and thats a fact.

Cheers!!
Personally, I do feel that the hysteria is a bit overblown, and I do wish people would stop making alarmist statements about how if we don’t act NOW NOW NOW we’ll all be dead in 5 years, because whenever they’re wrong, it just gives more ammunition to the oil companies and climate change deniers. I won’t debate the science, we’re not gonna agree anyway, but my point was simply that regardless of climate change, we do need another solution and it would be foolish to wait until we’re at zero hour, though that’s almost certainly what will happen because we are a very, very stupid species.
 

Phil C. McNasty

Go Jays Go
Dec 27, 2010
25,274
3,638
113
Personally, I do feel that the hysteria is a bit overblown, and I do wish people would stop making alarmist statements about how if we don’t act NOW NOW NOW we’ll all be dead in 5 years, because whenever they’re wrong, it just gives more ammunition to the oil companies and climate change deniers. I won’t debate the science, we’re not gonna agree anyway, but my point was simply that regardless of climate change, we do need another solution and it would be foolish to wait until we’re at zero hour, though that’s almost certainly what will happen because we are a very, very stupid species
I think we'll be okay. If CO2 global warming is real, we've only raised the temperature by 1 Celsius over the last 100 years.
If you look around the earth, and if you're gonna be 100% objective, it has had very little impact on our overall quality of life.

They say we only have 50 to 100 years of oil left anyways if we keep at current drilling rates (and remember we are now into the sludge. READ: shale oil).
I think we'll be okay in a hundred years. Maybe ethanol is the answer??
Or bloom boxes?? Who knows.

I think some genius like Edison or Elon Musk will come along and find some exotic, clean fuel.
Humans at the end of the day are ingenious, we'll figure it all out.

My motto: Life will pass you by if you're a worry wort
 

oil&gas

Well-known member
Apr 16, 2002
12,309
1,665
113
Ghawar
It is the same complaint every time an environmental activist flies. I remember the deniers and/or fossil fuel investors whining about Al Gore, Thunberg, David Suzuki and now this.

They should just read the old posts instead of wasting bandwidth.
Impact of air travel on climate change is no small matter.
Just because you heard the complaint mostly from
climate change deniers doesn't mean it should be dismissed.
How many times Greta Thunberg has repeatedly told
people: 'Just listen to science'? Should people at Davos 2020
just listen to her speeches from last year? Her warnings of the
impending catastrophe are apparently dismissed
by even some climate change believers in action.

From David Suzuki Foundation:


Although aviation is a relatively small industry, it has a disproportionately large impact on the climate system. It accounts for four to nine per cent of the total climate change impact of human activity.

But at a time when we urgently need to reduce our impact, greenhouse gas emissions from aviation continue to grow. For example, since 1990, CO2 emissions from international aviation have increased 83 per cent. ...
.............................................
Compared to other modes of transport, such as driving or taking the train, travelling by air has a greater climate impact per passenger kilometre, even over longer distances (see graph below). It’s also the mode of freight transport that produces the most emissions.
...................................
When jet fuel is burned, the carbon in the fuel is released and bonds with oxygen (O2) in the air to form carbon dioxide (CO2). Burning jet fuel also releases water vapour, nitrous oxides, sulphate, and soot.

A special characteristic of aircraft emissions is that most of them are produced at cruising altitudes high in the atmosphere. Scientific studies have shown that these high-altitude emissions have a more harmful climate impact because they trigger a series of chemical reactions and atmospheric effects that have a net warming effect. The IPCC, for example, has estimated that the climate impact of aircraft is two to four times greater than the effect of their carbon dioxide emissions alone.

Contrails are the long plumes of exhaust that can be seen in the sky behind airplanes. They consist primarily of water droplets and ice, and are formed when water vapour released from burning jet fuel condenses at higher altitudes. Contrails may stay in the sky for many hours, and can spread two kilometres wide before dispersing. The net effect of these contrails is to trap heat that would otherwise escape from the Earth, which contributes to global warming. Studies have shown that night flights have the strongest warming impact, because during the daytime contrails actually reflect some sunlight away from the earth.................................................


https://davidsuzuki.org/what-you-can-do/air-travel-climate-change/
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts