Toronto Escorts

The New York Times Endorses Elizabeth Warren And Amy Klobuchar

Charlemagne

Well-known member
Jul 19, 2017
15,451
2,483
113
01/19/2020 23:11 EST

The New York Times Endorses Elizabeth Warren And Amy Klobuchar

The newspaper shocked with two notable endorsements just weeks before the Iowa caucus, the first Democratic primary vote.

By Carla Herreria, HuffPost US

The New York Times editorial board endorsed both Sens. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) and Amy Klobuchar (Minn.) in the race for the Democratic presidential primary after interviewing the top nine contenders on issues that are most important to voters in this heated election year.

The Times deemed Warren and Klobuchar the best candidates to take on President Donald Trump later this year.

The boost for the pair of senators comes two weeks before the Feb. 3 caucuses in Iowa, the first state to vote on who they want to elect as president in November.

Over the past year, Warren, former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont have topped the polls in the race for the Democratic nomination, with Biden maintaining a slight lead over the other two. Klobuchar has struggled to stay in the pack and has not broken into the top tier of Democratic candidates.

The results of the Iowa caucuses typically, but not always, affect which candidate goes on to win the party’s nomination for president. Candidates who fail to gain a solid number of votes in this caucus often drop out afterward.

In 2016, Hillary Clinton won the Iowa caucuses as the Democratic presidential nominee while Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas topped the ticket for the Republican Party.

This time four years ago, the Times endorsed Clinton in the Democratic primary. She ended up winning the popular vote but lost the election to Trump. The newspaper has endorsed a Democrat in the last eight presidential elections.

Warren called for “big structural change” to government and tackling corruption in business and politics, which the Times pointed out was in line with a “polished script” she’s delivered often, during her interview with the editorial board in early December.

“She famously has ‘a plan for that’ and had a (lengthy) answer for nearly every question,” the board said when it published its transcript of the senator’s interview.

However, the board noted that Warren was “caught off guard” when asked about how to protect American nuclear weapons in Turkey and about the pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong.

Klobuchar drew praise from the Times, who called her a “standard-bearer for the Democratic center,” saying many progressive proposals could have their best chance under her administration.

You can read Warren’s full interview with the Times here and Klobuchar’s here.

https://m.huffingtonpost.ca/entry/new-york-times-endorses-warren-klobuchar_n_5e221f23c5b673621f760144
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
What ever will they do when neither gets the Nom?
 

The Oracle

Pronouns: Who/Cares
Mar 8, 2004
23,188
46,564
113
On the slopes of Mount Parnassus, Greece
''This time four years ago, the Times endorsed Clinton in the Democratic primary. She ended up winning the popular vote but lost the election to Trump. The newspaper has endorsed a Democrat in the last eight presidential elections.''

How about just report the news without showing your bias.

Main stream media is at an all time worst right now.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
5,927
1,198
113
It would seem they are hedging by endorsing two candidates a liberal and a moderate.
 

jcpro

Well-known member
Jan 31, 2014
24,673
6,836
113
It would seem they are hedging by endorsing two candidates a liberal and a moderate.
It's an odd pairing. Klobuchar is a cleaner, younger Biden, but Warren has no chance at all. Odd.
 

WyattEarp

Well-known member
May 17, 2017
5,927
1,198
113
It's an odd pairing. Klobuchar is a cleaner, younger Biden, but Warren has no chance at all. Odd.
I agree. I don't think the NY Times will warm up to Sanders' candidacy in the primaries. The New York money crowd might be generally liberal, but they are not suicidal.

The NY Times might support Sanders if he becomes the nominee as long as their readers are on board in defeating Trump at any cost.
 

onthebottom

Never Been Justly Banned
Jan 10, 2002
40,558
23
38
Hooterville
www.scubadiving.com
The Times has become a joke, picking two candidates, waffling on if it’s a candidate endorsement and being hyper partisan.
 

Butler1000

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2011
28,812
3,468
113
The Times has become a joke, picking two candidates, waffling on if it’s a candidate endorsement and being hyper partisan.
In other news their sports section has predicted the Kansas City Chiefs and the San Francisco 49ers will both win the Superbowl........
 

Smallcock

Active member
Jun 5, 2009
13,703
21
38
More reason not to vote for either of them. NYT elitism gives Americans the creeps.
 
Toronto Escorts