Assumes facts not in evidence. We do not know if Assange ever had access to hacked GOP emails. We do know the GOO was hacked. We do know that Assange said repeatedly he wanted Trump to win and reached out to Don Trump Jr personally to offer help. We do have good reason to suspect WikiLeaks held back incriminating material about Russia in the past.
All that to say that yes, we do not know if Assange had any GOP material, but it is awfully bold of you to assert he would have released it if he had.
The unvarnished truth statement is just nonsense of course, since Assange himself is on record saying he angles stuff for maximum impact and spin. (And that he specifically requested information from Trump Jr so that he could release it in a non damaging way and that would lend credibility to WikiLeaks as impartial when it attacked Clinton.)
What is the color of the sky in your world? Do jackalpoes exist there? Are there unicorns? This "red handed" moment that the Dems don't deny... Did it happen before or after the bowling Green massacre?
Um. You are assuming facts that he had emails. And yes he would have released them. He happily released shitload that damaged the Bush admin over the war.
Assange has a clear record of never having printed a lie. It's that simple.
As to red handed. The email release clearly shows Clinton paid the DNC debt in 2015 before the primary started and placed them on a continuing allowance out of her pocket(more likely the Clinton foundation funds) in exchange for control over messaging, personnel, and day to day operations including fundraising.
And they worked to undermine Sanders in the primaries instead of remaining neutral. And it was confirmed by Donna Brasille when she took over the Chair after Wasserman Schultz resigned in disgrace.
Do yes, ref handed is quite accurate.
LOL
